It’s War

Register to hide this ad
I thought it of interest that the Washington Post had an editorial two days ago in favor of the change. Their point seemed to be best do away with euphemisms, call a spade a spade, and make policy makers think carefully before calling for action by the Pentagon.

Personally, I prefer Dept of Defense. Mess with us or our friends and we will defend ourselves.
 
The War Department. Has a nice ring to it.
Yes, it does. And as an added bonus, historically accurate. Department of War just sounds stupid. Here's my Uncle Johns Basic Field Manual from 1941. To be completely accurate, just call it War Department,
 

Attachments

  • Field Manual.webp
    Field Manual.webp
    612.3 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
After the two world wars, it is easy to see why most nations decided that "Defense" (or even Defence) would now be the operative word. Why use a name that suggests a self-fulfilling prophecy of nasty stuff you've just been through.

Mind you, I did like the name of a building in Whitehall, the Old War Office Building (OWOB). The name carried a certain menace, especially when it became the HQ for the British version of the DIA. As you can see, it is a fairly forbidding, but elegant, Edwardian pile. Rumor control says the UK government abandoned it because the structure contained no steel and was vulnerable to a terrorist bomb. It is now a hotel.


OWOB01.webp
 
Last edited:
After the two world wars, it is easy to see why most nations decided on "Defense" (or even Defence) would now be the operative word. Why use a name that suggests a self-fulfilling prophecy of nasty stuff you've just been through.

Mind you, I did like the name of a building in Whitehall, the Old War Office Building (OWOB). The name carried a certain menace, especially when it became the HQ for the British version of the DIA. As you can see, it is a fairly forbidding, but elegant, Edwardian pile. Rumor control says the UK government abandoned it because the structure contained no steel and was vulnerable to a terrorist bomb. It is now a hotel.


View attachment 793011
What a gorgeous building. Bet they got a staff of 100 just to keep the pigeons under control!
 
What a gorgeous building. Bet they got a staff of 100 just to keep the pigeons under control!
The new owners kept many of the original floors and decorations. In another life I had cause to do a little work in that building, and I can vouch for all the mosaic tile floors and wood paneling. There were also some magnificent staircases, but they were closed off because of the way the building was divided into different security zones.

 
In my view, when the War Department's name was changed to Department of Defense back in the late 40's, a lot had to do with the fact that we had fought in two World Wars within a generation. America was weary of war...so to change the name to DoD was more appearance than substance to begin with.

The War Department and Secretary of War are an office and position that date back to Washington. I see nothing wrong with the change and to be frank, it has a more historical significance to it. We've had some pretty great people occupy the Secretary of War office; Knox, Stanton, Stimson, Root, et. al.

Congress will have to really approve any final/permanent changes...but I think it is a good idea and long overdue.
 
I think it's 100% appropriate.

Our economy is a war economy as defense spending is a huge chunk of the budget. We've been like that since Korea. On top of that, we conduct military ops around the globe. Not to mention invading and fighting low intensity proxy wars in 3rd world countries for decades that end when it becomes politically untenable with us, literally, running away. Also, we tend to bomb folks semi-regularly. Constant, endless wars.

So, yeah, Dept. of War is appropriate. The slogan should be, "War, it's what we do!"
 
Back
Top