I saw the movie yesterday. I have never read anything about J. Edgar Hoover. I have only heard and read the comments of people who have supposedly read about J. Edgar Hoover.
I have the impression that only three people really knew anything about J. Edgar Hoover, his mother, his secretary, and Mr. Tolson.
I do know that is was not uncommon back then for men, and women, to have very, very close friendships with the same sex and those friendships were not based on anything sexual.
Hollywood goes way out of its way to support gay rights but then Hollywood used most of the movie to insinuate a gay relationship between Hoover and Tolson just so they could trash Hoover.
I thought the movie was a cheap shot at a man who probably no one really knew much about.
As my wife told me, "It was not a movie about G-Men, it was a movie about a love affair between two men."
Clint Eastwood was interviewed about a week ago on television and the reporter asked him if the movie would delve deeply into the relationship between Hoover and Tolson.
Eastwood said he did not go into any great details in the movie but he would just leave the assumptions of the relationship up to the audience. He lied. The movie is quite implicit if not explicit in detailing a gay relationship between Hoover and Tolson.
Eastwood's "J. Edgar" to me was about as much trash as Stone's "JFK".
On a lighter side, I kept looking for Hoover to whip out his ".357 Magnum". But in the movie they were so determined to undermine his persona that they had him carrying a very small, short-barreled revolver of what appeared to be a .32 caliber persuasion. It looked like a Colt Pocket Positive with a three inch barrel. BUT...they had all the other "G-Men" carrying large handguns, shotguns, and tommy-guns...
I expect next year this movie will be nominated for several Oscars. It was a cheap shot at a right-wing conservative therefore in true Hollywood fashion a movie worth several Oscars.
Costuming and set design was great though!!