At least 2 local depts allow revolvers for BUGs for uniformed officers. Also plainclothes can carry one as their duty weapon.
That’s the only place you’ll see a revolver in LE, and then only rarely.
At least 2 local depts allow revolvers for BUGs for uniformed officers. Also plainclothes can carry one as their duty weapon.
I think NYPD ended their grandfathering of revolvers a few years ago.
It was several years ago I read where the last NYPD officer grandfathered in that was still carrying a revolver retired. The policy of grandfathering in revolvers ended at that point.
At a local grocery store in Omaha there is an off duty officer who carries a revolver. After seeing him a few times I had to inquire on my way out.i could tell it was blued and wearing Pachmayr grips but not the make or model. I politely asked him about his roscoe and he told me it was a Model 10. I told him it was cool to see an officer still toting a wheelgun and to have a good night.
I believe in Omaha the PD allows officers to choose their own duty weapons and he was one of the last of the "old guard."
Very true.
And not purely by chance either. Paul Barrett Glock: The Rise of America's Gun, explains how Glock entered the US mainstream. One could argue the development of the AR platforms was already pointing the way, but even so Glock was leader in the handgun transformation.As much as I like revolvers I know they will never make a return as an issue weapon. Economics alone prevents it. A good revolver costs way more than a Glock or M&P, and .38 or .357 ammo costs lots more than 9mm. When I order ammo for the office a case of .38 costs more than twice what 9mm does. When it’s only one or two cases the bean counters don’t get too upset, but if it was a few thousand cases they’d have a stroke. Ammo cost is killing off .45 in many agencies as well.
Whether true explantion or not I can't say. However, being that it is a museum type of site, its not surprising that at least someone believes that was the reason. The NPS wrestled with that concern for several decades in deciding the appropriate roles and image of the NPS Park Ranger. Of course there is a difference between security guards and Park Rangers. Park Rangers' primary role includes providing information, education, and in general representing the park.Was at National Archives in D.C. earlier this year. Security were all carrying revolvers. When I asked about it, was told they switched because, "Automatics made visitors nervous." I don't get it either, but that's what they said.
And few sidearms carried today have the punch of a .357. IF an officer can shoot a wheelgun would still be able to deal with most situations. Todays thugs all are hi cap folks whose “spray” philosophy sends a lot of rounds downrange. I sincerely believe our LE agencies need to REALLY stress marksmanship far far more than is currently “standard”. I know some LEO’s who shoot quail’s annually but other than that period their firearm just sits. I do NOT deliberately go in harms way (as a good cop does every day) but I darn sure put a lotof rounds downrange regularly because I want my skill set to be up to snuff.
I saw a Texas Ranger having lunch in a burger joint wearing what I think was model 27 or 28 with ivory stocks a few months ago.