Lexington MA where freedom began, to ban possession of Semi-autos

Here is the text of the bill. It says "one or more features" not two as in Mass AWB law. They want Revolvers and bolt actions only. Also the "ability to accept a magazine holding more than 10 rounds" even 1911's can get greater than 10 rounders for them.

GUNS
To see if the Town will vote to amend Ch 97 of the Code of the Town of Lexington (Public Conduct) by adding a new section regulating the manufacture, sale, and possession of firearms within the Town, or act in any other manner in relation thereto.
Whereas assault weapons are not traditionally used for self-defense in the Town of Lexington, and whereas assault weapons pose an undue threat to public safety to property owners, residents, visitors, and law enforcement personnel within the Town of Lexington, this amendment to Ch. 97 prohibits the manufacture, sale, ownership, or possession of assault weapons and large capacity ammunition magazines within the Town of Lexington.
1) Assault weapon means
a) A semiautomatic rifle that has the capacity to accept a large, detachable, magazine and one or more of the following properties:
• Only a pistol grip without a stock attached
• Any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand
• A folding, telescoping, or thumbhole stock
• A shroud attached to the barrel that partially or completely encircles the barrel, allowing the shooter to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand
• A muzzle brake or muzzle compensator

b) A semi-automatic pistol or any semi-automatic rifle that has a fixed magazine and the capacity to accept more than ten (10) rounds of ammunition.

c) A semi-automatic pistol that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and has one or more of the following properties:

• Any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand.
• A folding, telescoping, or thumbhole stock
• A shroud attached to the barrel that partially or completely encircles the barrel and that allows the bearer to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand
• A muzzle brake or muzzle compensator
• The capacity to accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip

d) A semiautomatic shotgun that has one or more the following properties:
• Only a pistol grip without a stock attached
• Any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand
• A folding, telescoping, or thumbhole stock
• A fixed magazine capacity in excess of five rounds
• An ability to accept a detachable magazine

e) Any shotgun with a revolving cylinder

f) Any conversion kit, part, or combination of parts from which an assault weapon can be assembled

g) The above prohibitions shall include, but not be limited to, the following assault weapon models:

• AK, AKM, AKS, AK-47, ARM, MAK90, MISR, NHM 90, NHM 91,SA 85, SA 93, VEPR
• AR-10
• AR-15, BUSHMASTER XM 15, ARMALITE M15, OLYMPIC ARMS PCR
• AR 70
• CALICO LIBERTY
• DRAGUNOV SVD SNIPER RIFLE, DRAGUNOV SVU
• FABRIQUE NATIONAL FN/FAL, FN/LAR, FNC
• HI-POINT CARBINE
• HK-91, HK 93, HK 94, HK PSG 1
• KEL-TEC SUB RIFLE
• SAIGA
• SAR 8, SAR 4800
• SKS with detachable magazine
• SLG 95
• SLR 95, SLR 96
• STEYR AUG
• STURM, RUGER MINI-14
• TAVOR
• THOMPSON 1927, THOMPSON M1, THOMPSON 1927 Commando
• UZI, GALIL, UZI SPORTER, GALIL SPORTER, GALIL SNIPER RIFLE (GALATZ)


And the following pistols, copies, or duplicates

• Calico M10
• MAC 10, MAC 11, MPA3
• OLYMPIC OA
• TEC 9, TEC d9, TEC 22 SCORPION, AB 10
• UZI

And the following shotguns, copies, or duplicates

• Armscor 30 BG
• SPAS 12, LAW 12
• STRIKER 12
• STREETSWEEPER

h) Assault weapon does not include any firearm that has been made permanently inoperable, or that satisfies the definition of an antique firearm (that is, manufactured before 1899)

i) Detachable magazine means any ammunition feeding device, the function of which is to deliver one or more ammunition cartridges into a firing chamber and which can be removed from the firearm without the use of any tool or kind of tool, including a bullet or an ammunition cartridge

j) Large capacity magazine means any ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than ten (10) rounds, but excluding a 22 caliber tube feeding device and a tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action firearm

k) Muzzle brake means a device attached to the muzzle of a weapon so that it utilizes escaping gases to reduce recoil

l) Muzzle compensator means a device attached to the muzzle of a weapon so that it utilizes escaping gases to control muzzle movement

2) These prohibitions against the manufacture, sale, ownership, and possession of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines within the Town of Lexington shall not apply to

a) Law enforcement officers or members of the armed forces of the United States acting within the scope of official duties

3) Any weapons or magazines deemed illegal in accord with this amended by-law within the Town of Lexington shall be seized and destroyed by the police of the Town of Lexington

4) The violation of this by-law is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of $1000

5) This amended by-law shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by Town by-laws and State regulations.
 
Unfortunatly the only ones who can vote in town elections are residents. But that is why I ran and won a seat on my hometown Town Meeting.

If something like this comes up the moderator can stop the general public from speaking but not the Town Meeting members. So I can have my say.
 
Been studying on this for awhile now. Only thing I can come up with is a history lesson for the nay-sayers. An order to "lay down your arms" has already failed once. Can't discount the common people.
 
I think this is to prevent another mass shooting in Lexington MA. There was a mass shooting using multiple military assault weapons and they don't want it to happen again.

In case you missed it, and it was in all the papers, it was on the town common and a bunch of guys wearing red with military assault weapons shot and killed multiple towns people. it was in 1775.
 
We are trying to fight this, GOAL is spreading the alarm.

I am not sure about preemption in Mass, if this passes and other towns pass even stricter laws such as banning handguns, this state will be a patchwork of local laws.
 
Our state laws preempt all local laws. The only places off limits are local government buildings so posted, schools and grounds but you can have your weapon in vehicle when picking up children or left in locked vehicle if you have to go in. City parks only when school activities are taking place, or an event that charges admission. And private business' when posted, but there is a bill in the State House to make the owners of such business liable for your safety. Class III firearms are legal with proper federal license. The Barrett .50 cal. sniper rifle is our state rifle, also a factory here. Even gangbangers are pretty much contained enough that shooting each other is about all they got left. Pretty nice here, I love my town and State. Would not want to live anywhere else.
 
Last edited:
you guys in the anti-gun states are really just second class citizens ...There is no job, no home, no mortgage that would make me live under that kind of tyranny.... you have my sympathies.
 
Contact the City Attorney. Point out to him or her the Maryland decision. Politely explain that the proposed ordinance is, as worded a ban on all semi-automatic firearms that accept a detachable magazine, as such a weapon WILL accept a magazine which contains more than 10 rounds. While I know of no one making a 15 round magazine for a Raven .25 auto, the gun will accept a properly made 15 round mag. Perhaps the city attorney and/or a law enforcement administrator (Chief of Police, Sheriff, State Police administrator, etc.) could convince the town spokespeople that the ordinance is likely to be struck down by federal courts, and cost the town a great deal of money in the process.
 
Liberals , of which MA has an over-abundance , are a form of cancer to those with common sense . I KNOW what I want/need for myself and my family , I'm willing to work for those needs and promise not to infringe on or hurt anyone else in this process . Why is it a liberal insists they know what's best for me and my family and will punish me in order to force their will upon me ? :confused: I can only be pushed so far and I'm guessing ( :rolleyes: ) most everyone here is of the same thought...can't wait for November to see if I'm right...:cool:
 
I have reached out to GOAL with the fact that this is a wide reaching ban, as they have contacts with the Mass Attorney General and I assume the Lexington Atty and certainly will have more say than someone like me who is not a resident of the town. However I will forward your thoughts along.

I have found where my towns selectmen's meeting agendas are posted and will watch it as part of my daily routine in case any anti gun stuff is scheduled.
 
Liberals , of which MA has an over-abundance , are a form of cancer to those with common sense . I KNOW what I want/need for myself and my family , I'm willing to work for those needs and promise not to infringe on or hurt anyone else in this process . Why is it a liberal insists they know what's best for me and my family and will punish me in order to force their will upon me ? :confused: I can only be pushed so far and I'm guessing ( :rolleyes: ) most everyone here is of the same thought...can't wait for November to see if I'm right...:cool:

If a conservative doesn't like meat they won't eat it, if a liberal doesn't like meat they try to make everyone a vegan
If a conservative doesn't like guns they don't buy one, if a liberal doesn't like guns they try to ban them
and on and on...
 
Didn't you guys have the original Tea Party up there a long while back?

Just sayin'

I'd rent a UHaul and point me toward 95 South.

Good luck up there!
 
I guess they are trying to stop another mass shooting in Lexington.

You remember hearing about the last mass shooting in Lexington, many men where shot down on the town common by a bunch of guys in red coats, it was 1775
 
You can fill the town meeting but with representative town meeting you will not know which side they support unless they wear NRA shirts or hats, as the residents are not allowed to talk only the elected representatives, which is why I ran in my town.
 
Hmm, I have to believe the criminal population will unanimously agree that Lexington should be a pretty safe place to ply their trade if this goes through...:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Hmm, I have to believe the criminal population will unanimously agree that Lexington should be a pretty safe place to ply their trade if this goes through...:rolleyes:

No, that would never happen because this latest law will be the one they obey!

I have decided on one of the tacks I will take if this comes to my local town meeting, I will stand up and simply ask the town meeting reps, "how many of you have ever used illegal drugs, marijuana or anything that is illegal by the Federal government?, hold up your hands. Drugs were banned in the 1930's but you still broke the law and used them or smoked a joint. If you as a law abiding citizen don't mind breaking the law, why do you think criminals will be afraid to break this law?"

Most will be afraid to hold up their hands but plenty have done grass and they will know it. :eek:
 
I'm probably going to be writing about this, for Examiner, TheGunMag.com and Conservative Firing Line.
Ben Cartwright...can you supply me with a link to the proposal? It's got to be online somewhere.
Many thanks!
 
Back
Top