I hadn't considered that loaded rounds will be too long to fit into the magazine. I think I'll use Varget at the starting load and work up. I bought these mostly as a curiosity and for a friend who has a LWRC rifle with a 1:7 twist. I figure I have nothing to lose by trying them in my DPMS with the 1:9 twist. Incidentally, the 1:7 twist stabilized the 35 gr. V-Max nicely, or at least it did at 50 yards. I didn't expect that.
As for OAL and the magazine issue, is there not a 100 or 110 gr. bullet in use by the SOCOM? I figure the troops aren't single loading these cartridges when somebody is shooting back at them.
Dave Sinko
Sir, I suspect you're going to have velocity/stability problems loading 80s to magazine length with a 1:9 twist. The 80s really need at least a 1:8 twist to stabilize from an AR's relatively short tube.
FWIW, my old 600-yard AR load was a Sierra 80, CCI 450 primer, new Winchester case, and 23.7 grains of VV N540. The bullet was seating long, 10 thousandths off the lands, but I don't have the actual overall length recorded. This load is hot and absolutely NOT suitable for mag-length seating.
From my 20-inch 1:8 barrel, that load averaged 2,672 fps 10 feet from the muzzle--and the wind *still* blew me all over the place at 600.
If you're shooting at shorter ranges, say 200-ish yards or less, you might get away with low velocities from loading mag length, but I think that 1:9 twist will still get you. Give it a try and see what happens, but was it me, I'd swap those 80s off for some 68s.
Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.
Ron H.