Long live the '03 Springfield!

Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
10,358
Reaction score
51,880
Location
Arizona
1903_LO_NUMBER-1280-1.jpg


The dawn of the 20th Century saw new developments in the field of small arms design. Smokeless powder was revolutionizing the ammunition industry, allowing cleaner firing, less smoke and easier cleaning of the firearm. The turnbolt Mauser design was accepted as the new de facto standard, and based on that firearm, the United States developed a much stronger and more sophisticated arm than the older Krag-Jorgensen rifle. The Model 1903 “Springfield” rifle served our nation in one form or another for over 50 years. Highly accurate, powerful, rugged, simple to operate, field strip and clean, the Model 1903 easily joins the ranks of classic military rifles.

United States forces first came up against Mauser rifles in the hands of Spanish troops during the Spanish-American War in Cuba. Our men were armed with the old .45-70 “trapdoor” black powder single shots and the recently-adopted Krag-Jorgensen repeaters. The Krag rifles and carbines required that rounds be inserted individually into the flip-down side-mounted magazine. The Mausers, on the other hand, could be more rapidly loaded five at a time by stripper clips. Also, the dual-lug design of the Mauser allowed for a more powerful cartridge. The Krag had only one locking lug, so it couldn’t handle the increased stress of high-velocity rounds. And so the die was cast, and trials began of prototypes of a new rifle based on the Mauser design.

In 1900, a prototype rifle was crafted at Springfield Armory in Springfield, Massachusetts. It had a clip-loaded single-stack magazine which projected below the stock, and a 30-inch barrel. Following tests, an Ordnance Department board recommended certain changes, including a rimless cartridge, a staggered-row magazine contained entirely within the stock, and an improved magazine-cut-off lever. In 1901, an improved prototype incorporating the recommended changes was made. It also featured a rod bayonet. Probably less than 40 of these rifles were virtually hand-made. Most had 30-inch barrels, although some carbines with 22-inch barrels were assembled. Following additional tests, the Ordnance board recommended that the barrel length be standardized at 24 inches (so the same rifle could be used by both infantry and cavalry) and that the rod bayonet be retained. It was to be chambered for a .30 caliber rimless round using round-nose bullets identical to those used in the Krag.

On June 19, 1903, the new rifle was formally adopted as the U.S. Magazine Rifle, caliber .30, Model of 1903. Both Springfield and Rock Island (Illinois) armories were instructed to begin production. Manufacture began at Springfield in November 1903 and at Rock Island in December 1904. Some relatively minor changes were made in rifling twist and cartridge power in order to reduce bore erosion. The rear sight was similar to the 1902 model used on the Krag, with a curved profile. The distinctive front sight had two holes below the blade. A beautiful rust-blued finish was applied. A hinged cap in the butt plate allowed access to a recess in the stock that contained an oiler and a screw-on head for the rod bayonet to allow its use as a cleaning rod. A few over 30,000 of these first rifles were issued. The fit and finish of these initial rifles rivaled commercial sporter rifles.

Obviously, the new arm was based on the Model 1898 Mauser, and the Mauser Company in Germany claimed seven patent infringements. An agreement between the U.S. and Mauser was made. It called for royalties of 75 cents per rifle, and 50 cents per thousand stripper clips until a total of $200,000 was paid. The final installment on this debt was paid in July 1909.

In 1905, at the insistence of combat veteran President Theodore Roosevelt, the rod bayonet was abandoned and almost all existing rifles were retrofitted to accommodate a 16-inch blade bayonet. This was designated as the M1905. President Roosevelt called the flimsy rod bayonet “the poorest invention I ever saw” after personally testing it. Also a new rear sight calibrated to 2,500 yards was fitted. The front sight base was solid, eliminating the two holes. The rifle illustrated for this article, now over 100 years old, was made in January 1906 at Springfield. It originally was a converted 1903 pattern chambered for the .30-03 cartridge. In 1912 it was called in to the Armory for cleaning and repair, and at that time was fitted with a new barrel made in 1908, chambered for the .30-06 cartridge. It was black-phosphate finished during the WWII period and shows heavy stock wear over its considerable life span.

On October 15, 1906, the improved .30-06 cartridge was made standard. It had a lighter, pointed spitzer bullet and improved powder that promised less barrel erosion. German claims of patent infringements on this round were made moot with our entry into WWI. All rifles previously chambered for the .30-03 were to be recalled and rechambered or rebarreled and fitted with newer sights calibrated to 2,800 yards. A very few original 1903 and 1905 pattern arms survived this mandatory retrofitting, and are extremely valuable collector’s pieces today. Springfield rifles below serial number 800,000 and Rock Island rifles below number 285,507 had an earlier heat treatment that resulted in receivers that were sometimes brittle. Therefore ‘03s which are to be shot today are recommended to have serials above those numbers, although many “low-numbered” arms have been shot with no problems.

The 1903 Springfield rifle was our standard service rifle during the Punitive Expedition to Mexico in 1916 and throughout WWI (although the Model 1917 “Enfield” was issued in larger numbers). There was a 1903 Mark I rifle designed for the top secret “Pedersen Device” (never used in battle) which could fire .30 caliber pistol-power cartridges semi-automatically. This variation had an oval ejection port in the receiver on the left side. A 1903A1 version with a curved pistol grip appeared during the 1920s. There was a 1903A2, but it was a subcaliber spotting device for artillery training, not a shoulder weapon. Remington made some standard 1903s in the early days of WWII on Rock Island machinery. A cheaper-to-produce 1903A3 rifle was made by Remington and Smith-Corona Typewriter Company during WWII. The ‘03A3 had a receiver-mounted rear peep sight and many stamped parts. The 1903A4 was a WWII scope-mounted sniper version of the 1903A3, and it served honorably as late as the Korean War. Most of these had 2.5x power Weaver 330C (M73B1) scopes. Specially-made Unertl-scoped 1903s were used by the Marines as sniper rifles in WWII and Korea. Although officially replaced by the M1 Garand rifle in 1936, the 1903, 1903A1, 1903A3 and 1903A4 rifles were widely issued during WWII, particularly to the Marines in the early days of the Pacific theater of war.

The 1903 Springfield was one of the most accurate battle rifles ever made and was employed in combat effectively even through the advent of standard semiautomatic weapons such as the M1 Garand. The “brown shoe” veterans spoke of them lovingly. Today, collectors earnestly seek out examples of most of the variations. Because many surplus ‘03 and ‘03A3 rifles were “sporterized” by civilians in the years following WWII, original unaltered service arms have skyrocketed in value over the past few years. The “03” has become an American icon and is easily and deservedly a classic military rifle.

I do love the venerable '03s and have a number of them, some of which can be seen in the "Pictures and Albums" section of this forum, under "U.S. .30-06 military rifles." They make a fascinating field for collectors interested in U.S. military history.

Hope you find this summary interesting.

John
 
Register to hide this ad
Neighbor?

John, is the house next door to you available? I would love to be your neighbor.

On second thought, your wife (or you) would probably keep me ran out.

I really enjoy your posts and being able to view your guns & histories of same. Thanks for sharing your knowlege.


Art
 
Very good writeup!

Where is the pictures and albumns section?

Go to the top of any page in this forum, and click on "Pictures and albums." That should take you right there. There are quite a few pages of albums - keep on through them until you find one labeled "U.S. .30-06 military rifles." It shows a picture of a Model 1941 Johnson semiauto rifle, which is one of those illustrated in the album along with the '03s. Click on that picture to browse through the pics.

Alternatively, just go to this link:

http://smith-wessonforum.com/members/paladin85020-albums-u-s-30-06-military-rifles.html

John
 
Last edited:
Some day I'm going to find a 03A3 and buy it.

I carried one for my last two years of high school..............in California, if you can believe it!!!

We went on bivouac for a week in the mountains. Had a great firing range with pits, Maggies drawers, the works.

What a great rifle that was..........
 
I like my o3 and o3a3's, fun guns to shoot. My o3 was a put together in the 90's. A Remington action and a Springfield barrel that unfortunately had been cleaned from the muzzle many,many times.I have purchased a new barrel from CMP and as soon as I can find a gunsmith to rebarrel and recollar her I will put her back in action. Any suggestions for a smith in the Western PA area that can do the job
 
I also carried one at NTC San Diego boot camp. They had been polished so many times they were in the white. The firing pins had been taken out of them. I was told it was because some fool found a round and thought it would be a good idea to fire it. I currently have a mint Remington 1903-A3 that I got a deal on about ten years ago. It is an old DCM gun that came in the Railroad Express box it was shipped in in 1963. Even though it didn't need it, it had an extra stock with all the metal that I have since used to bring an old sporter back to original. I have been told that these rifles were in use for over 70 years. They don't make stuff like they used to.
 
Great article Paladin. Mine is serial # 19XX with a later barrel and bolt. This gun is in the range of guns that are "too dangerous" to shoot. PFFFT! I used to plink with this thing in the 80's. I would shoot it now without hesitation. Maybe this one was being carried by a soldier when Patton drove up to Pershing in Mexico with those dead bandits strapped to the hood of his car like deer! That belt of unknown vintage is still packed with military ammo in clips.
When I hold this rifle I have an urge to go chasing William holden and the rest of the Wild Bunch across the border.
DSCN0812.jpg
 
Excellent write up on the old battle axe...here is a few little known facts about the 03...Peter Paul Mauser sued the U.S. for patent infringement and won. We were making the payout while WW I was underway. The barrels of the 03's were single point cut rifled. At the time that was the method used. Button rifling and cold hammer forging were not yet thought of. Both of those methods were born out of the necessity to build more rifles faster for WW II. Single point cut rifling is the best way to cut rifling and not induce any stress which results in a more accurate shooting barrel. This is probably the biggest reason the old match guns of the 20's and 30's, and the Marine snipers of WW II and Korea shot so well. Another little know fact is that the 03 was the rifle we learned just how important it was for accuracy to have the stock fit tight to the action. The match shooters used to place shims between the reciever and stock to make them as tight fitting as possible. This was kind of a "predessor" to glass bedding. Today, many match/target shooters pay a high premium for a single point cut rifled barrel and there are more custom barrel makers using this method, slow that it is, today then ever.
 
WOW, What a write up it makes me like my 03 even more. BTW 1934 production rebuilt for WW2 with a High Standard barrel and boy how she shoots.
 
Here is a good article discussing the failures of low serial number receivers. Information On M1903 Receiver Failures

According to Hatcher, there were 33 failures of Springfield receivers, some caused by trying to shoot 7.92 Mauser ammo in them. Most of the other ones were caused by firing rounds with pressures of 50-100% over normal. Some were caused by brass cartridges cases that had not been hardened to the right degree.

I have a Springfield Serial Number 725xxx with a barrel date of 10-17. I have shot this for over 40 years.

I was told that many of the older receivers were tested and found to be OK. I notice that there are several small dents in my receiver that looks like someone hit it with a pointed chisel. One is just to the left of the serial number. Could this be a hardness test?
 
Thanks John. I will pull my '43 Two-groove with Redfields front and rear, out and cuddle it in front of a war movie tonight. I threatened to sell it and opened the safe. I grabbed it, shouldered it, wiped it down and stuck it back in the safe...Thank God!!! :) By the way, I passed on an Keith-stamped (OGEK) 'O3 not long ago. I really fussed it over in my mind but just couldn't pull the trigger. I kinda wish I had, but I'm in love with the one I have now and duplicity wasn't an option at the time.
 
Last edited:
here is my 03-A3... all original shoot straight and in Really good shape for surplus. also have the bayonet and scabbard, not repo either... whats it worth?
 

Attachments

  • 100_5474.jpg
    100_5474.jpg
    74.8 KB · Views: 37
  • 100_5476.jpg
    100_5476.jpg
    33.2 KB · Views: 35
  • 100_5478.jpg
    100_5478.jpg
    62.9 KB · Views: 39
Spefix; I have a two groove Remington 03-A3 that's been sporterized: bolt bent, drilled and taped. It's amazingly accurate: with my old K 10 in the scope mounts it will shoot just over one inch at 100 yds. That's 10 shots, too. The dispersion is mostly lateral; if I could figure out how to take that out, it would be frighteningly accurate.

A few years ago we had an Explorer Scout post devoted to marksmanship. They shot high power with issued 03-A3s, that had been lightly tweaked (for free) by a local accuracy gunsmith. Not too many people beat them when they showed up for a match. One of them got a college scholarship out of it, too, and is now an engineer at White Sands Missile Range.
 
Thanks John. I will pull my '43 Two-groove with Redfields front and rear, out and cuddle it in front of a war movie tonight. I threatened to sell it and opened the safe. I grabbed it, shouldered it, wiped it down and stuck it back in the safe...Thank God!!! :) By the way, I passed on an Keith-stamped (OGEK) 'O3 not long ago. I really fussed it over in my mind but just couldn't pull the trigger. I kinda wish I had, but I'm in love with the one I have now and duplicity wasn't an option at the time.

One of my '03s, a MkI in original condition built in 1919, has Elmer's acceptance mark. Here's a pic of it:

MARKI-4-1.jpg


Updated note - this stamp is actually that of a Mr. Ed Klouser, who also worked at Ogden Arsenal during the WWII period. Elmer Keith's "OGEK" mark had the initials enclosed in a box. See the photo below for an example of Keith's stamp.

ELMER_KEITH_MARK.jpg


John
 
Last edited:
Excellent write up on the old battle axe...here is a few little known facts about the 03...Peter Paul Mauser sued the U.S. for patent infringement and won. We were making the payout while WW I was underway. The barrels of the 03's were single point cut rifled. At the time that was the method used. Button rifling and cold hammer forging were not yet thought of. Both of those methods were born out of the necessity to build more rifles faster for WW II. Single point cut rifling is the best way to cut rifling and not induce any stress which results in a more accurate shooting barrel. This is probably the biggest reason the old match guns of the 20's and 30's, and the Marine snipers of WW II and Korea shot so well. Another little know fact is that the 03 was the rifle we learned just how important it was for accuracy to have the stock fit tight to the action. The match shooters used to place shims between the reciever and stock to make them as tight fitting as possible. This was kind of a "predessor" to glass bedding. Today, many match/target shooters pay a high premium for a single point cut rifled barrel and there are more custom barrel makers using this method, slow that it is, today then ever.

The low-number '03 that's illustrated in the OP shows evidence of having been shot a lot. When disassembled, there was some charring inside the stock, and a paper shim was found near the nose of the stock. A lot of these old timers have been shot extensively, but I'd stick with shooting the higher numbers and keep the low-numbers mainly as collector items. I prefer not to tempt fate.

John
 
Spefix; I have a two groove Remington 03-A3 that's been sporterized: bolt bent, drilled and taped. It's amazingly accurate: with my old K 10 in the scope mounts it will shoot just over one inch at 100 yds. That's 10 shots, too. The dispersion is mostly lateral; if I could figure out how to take that out, it would be frighteningly accurate.

My first 03A3, a Remington obtained for very little from the DCM when I was in the Army in the early '60s, was sporterized by me to make it into a hunting rifle. I used a Fajen stock and glass bedded it, free-floating the 4-groove barrel. I was hand-loading 125-grain spitzers that made about 3,000 fps for varmint work. I routinely shot 3-round groups with that load that measured under 1 inch at 100 yards with the issue iron sights. Properly set up, these rifles can be quite accurate. I still have that rifle, although I now regret destroying its collector value by sporterizing it in my then-uninformed youth.

John
 
I had a full military 1943 Remington '03A3 for several years. It was only a two groove barrel model, but it too would shot under an inch at 100 yards, using a 3-9 Tasco and a handload built around a .307 .30-30 bullet! The scope mount I used replaced the cut-off switch.

Wish I still had it. :(
 
Back
Top