Looking for Plaintiffs for State court case on Illinois Assault Weapons Ban

Joined
May 24, 2018
Messages
4,680
Reaction score
12,072
Location
Vanuatu
Former AG candidate Tom DeVore is looking for Illinois plaintiffs for a State Court case against the Illinois General Assembly based on defective procedure in passing the soon-to-be-signed Illinois Assault Weapons Ban.

Details here:

Illinois Assault Weapons Ban - DeVore Law Office, LLC


Disclaimer: Aside from being stuck in this benighted State, I have no connection to Tom DeVore or the instant case.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
The question is whether or not you can be a plaintiff just because you're a gun owner or do you have to be arrested in order to have standing?

I don't know that answer.
 
The question is whether or not you can be a plaintiff just because you're a gun owner or do you have to be arrested in order to have standing?

I don't know that answer.

As the case is about violation of legislative procedure, I don't think one needs to be arrested.

There's a video on the site.
 
I'll wait for a case on the merits / constitutionality of the law, rather than just the procedure.

If it had followed procedure it never would have made it out of committee. Note, no request for witness slips. It started out as an insurance regulation and slid out of committee that way.

That's a big problem.
 
There are differences in jurisdiction between federal courts and state courts. It isn’t the pro freedom lawyers’ option to combine the two in federal court, so they are going to have to proceed separately.
 
IMHO, the state suit about legislative procedures is a waste of time. The Democrats have a super majority in both chambers of the Illinois legislature. Even if that suit prevails, the Dems will pass it again anyway.

The real place for a suit is in federal court challenging the constitutionality. I'm optimistic with that, because it'll be the first outright ban litigated after Bruen. A win on this will invalidate every similar ban in the U.S. Be not afraid!!
 
IMHO, the state suit about legislative procedures is a waste of time. The Democrats have a super majority in both chambers of the Illinois legislature. Even if that suit prevails, the Dems will pass it again anyway.

The real place for a suit is in federal court challenging the constitutionality. I'm optimistic with that, because it'll be the first outright ban litigated after Bruen. A win on this will invalidate every similar ban in the U.S. Be not afraid!!

I disagree. Even with their supermajority a lot of proposed gun regulations don't make it out of committee- when they actually follow procedure.

I doubt that this would have made it if they didn't backdoor it under an unrelated bill.

This is apples, the federal 2A case the ISRA will file as soon as Pritzker signs it is oranges. Both is better than either on its own.
 
Last edited:
State sheriffs are not going to follow this law. How can they?

This is a blatant attack on guns. They will NEVER get guns out of criminal environments: NEVER. We have the rights to protect ourselves. My question is this: Does one have to be a resident in the state to stand against this?
 
Last edited:
State sheriffs are not going to follow this law. How can they?

This is a blatant attack on guns. They will NEVER get guns out of criminal environments: NEVER. We have the rights to protect ourselves. My question is this: Does one have to be a resident in the state to stand against this?

To be a plaintiff, yes, you need to be a resident. But I think you can contribute to the case without being a plaintiff.

See the site above.

Also, ISRA is always happy for donations.

Donate / Support ISRA - Illinois State Rifle Association
 
Last edited:
I just read where over 70 County sheriffs in Illinois have already said they will not enforce the new law. That's out of 102 counties in the state. Our arrogant governor overlooks the fact he only carried 13 of the 102 counties in the last election. Unfortunately, one of those is Cook (Crook) County, so the rest of us are stuck with him. Here's what he said about police who vow not to enforce the law:

“As are all law enforcement all across our state and they will in fact do their job or they won’t be in their job,” Pritzker said Tuesday during a press conference.

Apparently nobody has told him sheriffs are elected to office, and he cannot fire them.
 
From DOJ statistics years ago.
https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/GUIC.PDF

Although most crime is not committed with guns, most gun crime is committed with handguns. pages 1 & 2
Although most available guns are
not used in crime, information about
the 223 million guns available to the
general public provides a context for
evaluating criminal preferences for
guns. page 2
By definition, stolen guns are available to criminals. The FBI's National
Crime Information Center (NCIC)
stolen gun file contains over 2 million
reports; 60% are reports of stolen
handguns. page 3
In 1994, the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms (ATF)
received over 85,132 requests from
law enforcement agencies for traces
of guns used in crime. Over threequarters of the guns traced by the
ATF in 1994 were handguns (mostly
pistols), and almost a third were less
than 3 years old. page 4
Surveys of inmates show that they
prefer concealable, large caliber
guns. Juvenile offenders appear to
be more likely to possess guns than
adults. page 5
Studies of the guns used in homicides show that large caliber revolvers are the most frequent type of gun
used in homicides, but the number
of large caliber semiautomatic guns
used in murders is increasing. page 5
Little information exists about the
use of assault weapons in crime. The
information that does exist uses varying definitions of assault weapons that
were developed before the Federal
assault weapons ban was enacted.
page 6
H

"Little information exists about the
use of assault weapons in crime."

With a number of shootings in the past few years, some people are very concerned about certain guns. I, myself, am more concerned with how many criminals are using guns. Our governments are using them. Our crime rate is astounding, and there is a shortcoming of getting them off the streets; only to watch their being released or pampered in a jail cell for years before trying them.

Juveniles. Can't teach or correct them properly because of laws. We do not need any new laws. stop
 
Last edited:
102.3 OATH OF OFFICE
“I do solemnly swear (affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of (state title) to the best of my ability.”

The Sheriffs can't do both........
 
Back
Top