M&P 9 Shield -vs- M&P9c

All they had were 9's. Haven't heard of 40s being available right now, but they might be. For me, 9mm is easier for me to shoot well.

Tommato

I should've been a little more informative. When I called my LGS they were taking orders for the 9mm and starting a list for people wanting the .40. Hmm....I might also go with the 9mm, but I'm not allowed to get another gun (stupid wife) until Sept./Oct.
 
Not the first time S&W has run compact & subcompact models in the same general model line. The compact 3rd gen's were run alongside the subcompact Chiefs Special models. They only ran approx half an inch less in barrel length difference, too, and with only a round less in mag capacity compared to the slightly larger compact guns.

I see this as pretty much the same concept, and S&W obviously feels there's a market for a slightly slimmer & shorter M&P model.

If this new trigger is as good as I've been hearing (for a plastic gun), and the practical accuracy is similar to the other M&P's some of the other guys and I own and have been using, it'll be a welcome addition to the M&P concept.

It might not be as nice as the triggers in my SW99's (the TDA-type actions), and it may run half a pound heavier than the trigger of the 99 variation Walther is selling as the PPQ ... but Walther doesn't make a compact or subcompact in the PPQ line, and the Shield is smaller than the M&P compact series. ;) Being in the M&P model line, it ought to be a bit less complex than the PPS, too (from a an armorer's perspective).

I'll have to get one in my hands, though, to really assess what it's like. The LE distributor said they can't order the commercial release models, and they can't order the LE version until S&W has them in inventory.
 
Lots of interest here for the Shield!!! Anyone interested but shying away from the first production run to let the bugs get worked out?

I'm waiting for the (I really hope they do), 45 version. I carry the 45 full size with ease but would love to have a single stack version.
 
Bought mine for $399 from LGS. I have a M&P 9c and also a LC9, but still gravitate towards my M&P 340. I want to pocket carry in the summer and the M&P 9c is a bit too large. Anyway, I plan to pass them all down to the kids in the end.
 
I just got mine today from my LGS for $390 + tax. I really like this gun and was seriously considering the LC9 before this came out. I think the Shield is far superior to the LC9 and in no way replaces my compacts. The compacts have more fire power, can use full-size mags, and will be more comfortable to shoot for extended periods. I will carry the Shield as a BUG or when it is difficult to carry a larger gun.
 
Wife shudders when I say: "Ooooh".

Hello all, first-time M&P9 owner and loving it. Was recently searching for a CC 9mm and kept bouncing between the 9c and the Walther PPS. Now that I've seen the Shield, it will be a toss-up between it and the 9c. If they offer the Shield without the thumb safety, I'll be all over it. Was also looking at bar-and-dot tritium sights for my full-size 9. Found a good looking set from AmeriGlo. Now I will definitely have to get both the 9c AND the Shield - with AmeriGlo sights for all. And then prepare myself for the laying-into the wife is going to give me over it.
 
I have a 9c and bought a Shield this morning, had a chance to shoot both this afternoon.
They really are quite different, more than you would think given they are both M&P series pistols.
The shield of of course slightly shorter in slide, very nearly the same height in the butt, of course its quite a bit thinner.
In shooting, the 9c shoots softer, the Shield has noticeably more snappy recoil, hardly unmanagable, its only a 9mm after all but its noticable.
I've always liked my 9c but its just a weeeeeeeeee bigger in grip than I would prefer. I really like single stack pistols, my Sig 239 SAS, Beretta Nano and now the Shield and I think how they feel in the hand will be the decision maker for a lot of people.
More of a choice would be between something like the Shield and the Nano and in truth they handle and shoot somewhat similarly. The Nano is just a skosh shorter in the butt but slide length is quite similar.
The Nano trigger pull is longer which is worthy of consideration in choosing between the two and the Nano lacks an external slide stop lever or manual safety. It is slightly 'slicker' as far as portrubances go. Myself I like the trigger on the Shield better because I am used to the M&P system and it is consistent with those pistols (a bit heavier than my others on this particular sample). For my money they could have left the manual safety off, I see no need of it. I think I might have advocated for chopping another half inch or so off the butt for even better concealment but most people freak at not having a place to put their pinky so I see the wisdom in not doing it.
The Shield will be a big hit I think, amazing to me they hit this price point with it. I paid $419 for mine, exactly what the same store sells the Nano for.
 
My math has never been the greatest, but I believe the difference is +.25"

DW

LOL, I got confused here for a sec... hahhaa

anyways... I just saw a thread about someone comparing this to a PM9 for pocket carry. it seems like it fails in that point, and won't be replacing my PF9 :(
 
Currently I have 6 M&Ps...want to add the Shield in 40 & 9 to my collection. I'm not a big Beta person but from what I have read, the Shield should have little to no issues since the M&P system has been perfected. Understand no line is completely free of bugs.

Is anyone concerned with buying the first batch? I'm like the kid in Willy Wonka...I want one and I want one now!!! Actually want both. 🔫. 😉
 
The shield is NOT a deep concealment piece.

What does deep concealment mean to you?

It means pocket carry to most everyone.

Most people carry apendix when they dont have to
Tuck thier shirt in.

With the proper holster, you can actually comfortably carry a thicker heavier pistol.

When i have to tuck in a shirt, i pocket carry.


Why couldnt sw use less rounds, keep the pistol at a height of 4 inches
And give an extended mag

For me.... The shield would probably have retired my CM9, (and MANY ) other peoples)



I looked forward to this announcement, because i thought that they would offer a thin pistol
 
The shield is NOT a deep concealment piece.

What does deep concealment mean to you?

It means pocket carry to most everyone.

...

Funny thing:
I pocket carry my longer, wider, taller, heavier M64 snubby all the time. I could easily "deep conceal" this pistol.

When it comes out in a forty.:cool:
 
Reading quite a few complaints about the size of the shields. One possibility is that it could not be made any smaller and still have the same reliability that people have come to expect from the M&P line of pistols. Other manufactures have made smaller 9mm pistols and some have had spotty reliability issues. Look how many people bash Kahr PM9's, mine runs 100% but it seems there are a few that don't. If M&P wan'ts to corner the LEO bug market and become king of the hill with CCW'ers it has to be very reliable. Hell look at the tarnishing that Glock has taken over the gen 4 line. I have four gen 4 Glocks that all run 100%. The few that don't work well has left Glock with a very bad taste in it's mouth. I love all my Glocks and don't plan on selling them, but I do see the M&P line for what it is. A great pistol with a great up and comming future striving to be #1 in the LEO/CCW community and I'll bet they are trying to avoid any setbacks at any cost. Just my two cents, which is worth nothing in this economy.
 
My new shield cost was $399.00 +Tax and is my 4th M&P. I own a 9mm FS, a 9mmc, a 40c and a 357sig barrel. The fs 9 has a threaded barrel option. I find my new Shield a very nice gun to shoot and bought it to replace my PF9 which is not easy to shoot as it rapps my trigger finger very hard with each shot. The shield has no such problem. By the way I also have a a new Taurus PT738. I turly love that gun and the handy little Bulldog case. That is slick and much easier to carry and draw from than I thought it would be. It is also very comfortable to carry. I now carry it much of the time with Critical Defense loads.
 
So now what happens to the M&P9c and M&P40c? Isn't this similar to what S&W did with the Sigma -vs- SD line? I understand the Shield is slightly smaller and lighter but am I the only one confused by this new line-up?

Given the dimensions of the M&P 40 Shield are similar to the 9 Shield, why do I carry the Shield -vs- 40c? Because I can't handle the extra 1.3" length, .3" width/height or an additional 7 oz? I understand S&W is going after a very popular CCW market right now but does this mean that the 9c & 40c is going to slowly die off? What am i missing here?

I see no jeopardy for the M&P compacts (especially since carry capacity is a big issue for a lot of people), and I see the Shield as S&W simply offering people another choice in their product line.
 
Back
Top