M&P compact 2.0 vs Sig p320 compact.

[JP7678]

Hi all,

Just curious. What are your comparative impressions on these two: strengths and weaknesses? They seem to be in the same price range (unheard of for Sig).

 

[Philadelphia Patriot]

I have a full sized m&p 2.0 and the p320 carry. I like the m&p 2.0 full size better. The trigger and ergonomics on the m&p 2.0 feel better to me and I’m a trigger snob. That being said, the p320 isn’t a bad gun either.

 

[bronco45]

Have owned both, prefer the 2.0c for the grip and trigger is a skosh better than the 320. Tossup on the sights and capacity. Accuracy a little better for me with the 2.0c.

Still shoot and enjoy the Smith.

 

[Trailryder50]

I was all set to buy a P320, then this thing about the recall hit and I decided to hold off. Bought the 2.0 compact instead. No regrets. May still buy a P320 after Sig gets the reworked units back out on the market.

 

[dsk]

IMO the trigger on the P320 is a little better, but the grip is way too slippery for me. The fact that you have to go buy an entire new polymer frame just to change the grip size is also a huge turnoff for me. The S&W comes with a total of four backstraps to change the grip and it takes but 10 seconds to do.

 

[Ray1970]

I have the full size 2.0 and had a P320. I no longer have the Sig but still own the 2.0.

I’m weird about the mechanics of stuff and I didn’t like the way that they engineered the sear to reset on the pull of the trigger. Not sure if that makes sense the way I said it but most striker fired pistols use the rearward movement of the slide to reset the sear so that the striker catches it when the slide returns forward. I could induce failures of the striker to reset on the one I owned. There are a few YouTube videos of people with the same failures I’m talking about. Basically if you don’t pull the trigger back far enough after the shot breaks the sear will stay down and the striker will not catch the sear as the slide returns to battery. I’m probably not explaining any of this to where it makes sense but for me the mechanics of the action just bothered me to the point where I didn’t want to own the 320.

 

[shawn mccarver]

The M&P2.0 Compact was introduced to compete directly with the Glock 19.

The biggest difference between the M&P2.0 Compact and the SIG P320 Compact is that the SIG P320 is a little taller, and a little fatter, and it does make a difference. I tried the P320 Compact, and it is noticeably harder to conceal than a G19. Small differences really do add up. The G19 hits a "sweet spot" of size, capacity, and shootability that no other make has been able to match. The P320 Compact is simply not as concealable as the G19.

The M&P2.0 Compact, on the other hand, is the same size as the G19. That said, the sandpaper grip on the M&P2.0 Series is just not good for concealed carry for me, and I have seen others make the same criticism.

So, were it me, I would opt for the G19 over both the M&P2.0 Compact and the P320 Compact.

In addition, the SIG P320 is under a "voluntary upgrade" now as a result of the pistols discharging when dropped. If you get the P320, be sure you get an upgraded one. I am still not confident that the fix by SIG will prevent such discharges, and I am waiting for the You Tube tests of the "upgraded" P320 which I am sure people will do at some point. SIG, of course, had a bunch of people out to their facility to let them observe testing of the P320 after retrofit, but the drops were not from a very great distance, and they only did 3 drops, if I recall. I hope it works for them, but I'm skeptical.

 

[JP7678]

Wow. All good points. Thanks for all your comments and ideas. I wonder if the internal mechanics Ray mentions has anything to do with the discharges when dropped that Shawn mentions.

 

[Nicefish]

In my opinion: Sig P320 - better trigger, front slide serrations, easier take down, readily available night sights, more color options, ambidextrous slide releases that work with out tons of break in, modularity. S&W 2.0 compact - true 4" barrel, a bit smaller, lower bore access, American company, and don't have to deal with all "up grade/misfire" stuff. I think the p320 is a great gun with a bright future ahead of it. For what is worth I sold mine and bought the 2.0 compact. Love it too.

 

[Ray1970]

The issue with the discharge when dropped I believe is caused by the lack of any sort of trigger safety and the actual trigger itself being rather large and heavy. If the pistol was dropped and landed at just the right angle the inertia of the trigger would cause it to move rearward just as if it had been pulled. I think Sig’s fix is to install a lighter trigger.

A lot of people like the P320 and it did pass extensive testing by the military when it was selected to replace the Beretta M9 so it’s not like it’s a bad pistol. Just not my cup of tea.

Also, like a previous poster mentioned, it does seem a little chunky compared to something like the Glock 19 or the M&P.

I own or have owned examples of just about every plastic, striker fired handgun you can imagine. Depending on your intended use my personal top three would be the Glock 19, the HK VP9, and the M&P 2.0. Your mileage may vary.

 

[SATX]

It depends if you plan on dropping it.

 

[OU 812]

I own the M&P 9 2.0 full size and a M&P 9c 12rd version. My brother in law purchased a Sig 320c and I was giving the chance to shoot it over the forth of July weekend.

I was impressed with the Sig fit and finish was good and it shot well and the size is just right. Other then the trigger problem I would love to own one. But I would buy the M&P 9c 2.0.

 

[Nicefish]

With the p320 they are putting a lighter trigger in it, but the are doing something to the slide also. I put the Sig flat trigger in mine, but that apparently was not enough. Sig said to put the original curved trigger back in and send it back for a full upgrade.

 

[Tanners Owner]

I have the upgraded 320 & must say am impressed. For me, the trigger pull is better than before.

In comparison to my M&P FS 1.0, I prefer the ergos of the M&P by far. Out of the box trigger goes to the 320, but with the apex trigger in my M&P, it goes to the m&p. I also prefer the finish on the m&p.

I like the grip modules, as with my compact slide I can use three different grip sizes - subcompact (12 rd) compact (15rd) and carry (17 rd)

Both good guns, backed by solid company’s warranty. Go with what works/ fits you best.

 

[dsk]

The issue with the discharge when dropped I believe is caused by the lack of any sort of trigger safety and the actual trigger itself being rather large and heavy. If the pistol was dropped and landed at just the right angle the inertia of the trigger would cause it to move rearward just as if it had been pulled. I think Sig’s fix is to install a lighter trigger.

When the P320 first came out and I looked at one I couldn't understand how SIG managed to get away with not having a "dingus" on the trigger like everyone else to prevent the trigger moving without the shooter's finger on it. I guess the drop issues answered that question. My only other question now is why the military pistols aren't affected and what is different on those.

 

[Ray1970]

When the P320 first came out and I looked at one I couldn't understand how SIG managed to get away with not having a "dingus" on the trigger like everyone else to prevent the trigger moving without the shooter's finger on it. I guess the drop issues answered that question. My only other question now is why the military pistols aren't affected and what is different on those.

I think the military versions will have a manual thumb safety. Perhaps that makes them "drop safe". I had also heard that the MHS trials didn't include any sort of drop test.

 

[exxonv]

Hi all,

Just curious. What are your comparative impressions on these two: strengths and weaknesses? They seem to be in the same price range (unheard of for Sig).

I just picked up the M&P9 M2.0 Compact and I love it. Posted a video of my first shots here: Smith & Wesson M&P9 M2.0 Compact - Range Time - YouTube

I just got my P320c FDE back from Sig (recall) and I love it .

My Glock 19 Gen 4 is starting to wonder if a rif (reduction in force) is coming...

Seriously, to me, the P320c is wider/bigger as someone else mentioned. I like both the P320c and the M2.0 triggers equally, but I personally LOVE the grip on the M2.0.

I'd recommend the M2.0 Compact over the P320c for conceal carry, but really, get them both, just pick which one you buy first

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[KELSW]

Do the trijicon HD sights really help with sight pic etc over the stock sights ? Nice shooting btw . I have the 4.25 9 mm 2.0 . I assume you have the regular HD not the XR .

 

[presspics]

I've owned both. Actually I've pretty much owned every handgun made at one point or another over 30 years. The M&P 2.0 Compact is a superior gun to the P320. I sold my last P320 to get the 2.0 Compact. Now every handgun that I own is an M&P....S&W has finally hit every category with their M&P line and it has everything I want and need..

 

[dsk]

I think the military versions will have a manual thumb safety. Perhaps that makes them "drop safe". I had also heard that the MHS trials didn't include any sort of drop test.

I know they have a thumb safety, but I guess on a battlefield with bullets zipping past everywhere they don't care if you drop your gun and it goes off.