mgo
Member
Of course, this is my personal preference, and your thoughts may be different....
I rarely read that people like the thumb safety on the M&P because it enables safer holstering (cannot always see the holster when holstering) there's less chance of clothing or other objects snagging the trigger and firing the gun when holstering. Holster pistol, then snick the safety off. Pistol ready to go. (of course, I always check for that snag anyway before taking safety off!)
My HK USP variant 1 also has this excellent safety feature.
(Since the HK has a external hammer, one can keep the thumb on the hammer spur during holstering, too)
Also, when loading and unloading the pistol, the M&P thumb safety makes that operation less hazardous. (did you know that you CAN chamber/eject a round and load/unload the pistol with the thumb safety ON?) Less risky that way!
I rarely read that people like the thumb safety on the M&P because it enables safer holstering (cannot always see the holster when holstering) there's less chance of clothing or other objects snagging the trigger and firing the gun when holstering. Holster pistol, then snick the safety off. Pistol ready to go. (of course, I always check for that snag anyway before taking safety off!)
My HK USP variant 1 also has this excellent safety feature.
(Since the HK has a external hammer, one can keep the thumb on the hammer spur during holstering, too)
Also, when loading and unloading the pistol, the M&P thumb safety makes that operation less hazardous. (did you know that you CAN chamber/eject a round and load/unload the pistol with the thumb safety ON?) Less risky that way!