cyphertext
US Veteran
Just added a UTG extended rail. Wanted to keep the iron sites just in case. By the way, this is my first Ar15 build.
If they would make one of these with M-Lok and be slim, I would probably put one on my Sport...
Just added a UTG extended rail. Wanted to keep the iron sites just in case. By the way, this is my first Ar15 build.
It's a 3 piece rail system. The top part is slotted out to go over the iron sight and the bottom is in 2 parts. It split to let the sling ring stick out and the front part covers the bayonet stud. I wanted the extra in front to hold the bipod stand and extend the front foregrip to where it's comfortable to hold when I am standing. Going to the range this weekend to sight in the scope and to see how it shots.I really like that! At the range this last weekend I kept hitting my index finger on my bayonet stud that was really hot, does the stud still protrude below your rail?
If they would make one of these with M-Lok and be slim, I would probably put one on my Sport...
They have M-loc and slim models
Kapz wrote:
From what I gather it is not worth spending upwards of $50 for a sub-par handgaurd that is no better than the original.
That was the conclusion I reached. Both of my Sport IIs are still completely stock.
I think it would be difficult to find a handguard that is not any better than the one on the Sport rifles
The stock CH is horrible, I don't understand how anyone could leave these rifles completely stock? The point of the AR is that it's meant to be modular...
How could I leave mine stock? Because it simply works as is, right out of the box. Modular doesn't mean you need to replace every part just because you can.
If I am going to throw a lot of money towards changing features on a Sport, well, I would just buy the rifle that already had the features I wanted on it.
Exactly! If you are not going to hang a light, sling, a cheese grater and hostage extractor from a rail then there is no need to replace the handguards on a Sport II. If you buy a RD like a Aimpoint Pro and 1/3 co-witness there is no need to replace the A2 front post.
If you need to replace all of that stuff on a Sport II maybe you should buy a different rifle. IMHO YMMV
If I am going to throw a lot of money towards changing features on a Sport, well, I would just buy the rifle that already had the features I wanted on it.
They don't sell a rifle with all the features I want already installed.....
They don't sell a rifle with all the features I want already installed.....
They don't sell a rifle with all the features I want already installed.....
Who is "they"? A lot more manufactures out there than just S&W. And even if there is not one exactly like you want, I bet there are several that start off closer than the Sport.
I get it, you like to play with yours like it is a Lego set. Nothing wrong with that. I like the simplicity and no frills of the Sport. Nothing wrong with that either. Mine is a Sport I as well, so I don't even have an ejection port cover or forward assist. Just don't feel compelled to change a thing on that rifle.
Then you should build it from the ground up vs paying for parts you are not going to use. IMHO but whatever works for you works for me. After all you are not spending my money. Tweaking small parts here and there makes sense and everyone does it what does not make sense to me is things like rails. It is too easy to get a OEM style rifle or one with the rail you want on the upper of your choice to buy something like the Sport II and immediately modify it.