Magpul MBUS polymer front sight hasn't melted yet...

js_paddle07

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
30
Reaction score
4
I have it mounted to the gas block on my M&P15OR. I've fired quite a few consecutive rounds and the sight hasn't melted yet.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
It isn't going to melt into a gooey mess after a few shots, but it may melt ever so slightly to where the sight is canted and it can lose zero.

ETA: My fear would be that it would melt the threads on the sight post where I could no longer adjust it.
 
Last edited:
You're just tempting fate. From Magpul themselves, from the MBUS Front site product page under the "specs" tab, at the bottom:

"NOTE: Cannot be mounted to a railed gas block due to excess heat issues.
Front MBUS must be mounted to a railed fore end on the same plane as the receiver rail. "

MBUS® SIGHTS - MBUS® - Magpul® Back-Up Sight ? Front

But it's your money...

I think some 'tests' have been done and it holds up fine.
 
I think some 'tests' have been done and it holds up fine.

As much as we all want the zombie apocalypse to happen, it probably won't, so sustained rapid fire won't be necessary. As long as you don't push it too much, sounds like you will be alright I guess :).
 
If not, all he's got to do is scrape off burnt on charred goo off his railed gas block.

I know this is taking the thread in a slightly different direction and I don't mean to be insulting to anyone.... but...


Why?

If you have a quad rail, move the plastic sight back a few notches so it's off the gas block. If you have a standard handguard and have to mount your front sight on the railed gas block, get a metal one! It may not have the "magpul" name on it, but there are several folding metal front sights within the price range of the MBUS. And if you must have Magpul, they now have the MBUS Pro which is all metal, albeit at a higher price.

Again... why put the polymer on a railed gas block, knowing full well what the risk is? WHY take that risk and give yourself a self imposed limitation on rate of fire? It's really unnecessary, given the other options.
 
I 'suspect' the problem would arise with a combination of a high rate of fire and high ambient temperatures.

Testing would probably give you an idea of a safe rate for a given temperature, but this assumes you can afford to stay within the limits.

For casual shooting this might be fine, but what about sights on a gun that may see combat? You wouldn't want to find that your backup sight had failed just when you needed it most.
 
YHM Metal Gas Block/Flip-up Sight FTW!

That's what I'll be switching to once I decide to remove my A2 front post.
 
I know this is taking the thread in a slightly different direction and I don't mean to be insulting to anyone.... but...


Why?

If you have a quad rail, move the plastic sight back a few notches so it's off the gas block. If you have a standard handguard and have to mount your front sight on the railed gas block, get a metal one! It may not have the "magpul" name on it, but there are several folding metal front sights within the price range of the MBUS. And if you must have Magpul, they now have the MBUS Pro which is all metal, albeit at a higher price.

Again... why put the polymer on a railed gas block, knowing full well what the risk is? WHY take that risk and give yourself a self imposed limitation on rate of fire? It's really unnecessary, given the other options.

All valid points. First off, the sights were on the rifle when I bought it, so I didn't choose to add polymer sights.

Secondly, I feel like the sight moved back and an empty gas block just wouldn't look good.

Thirdly, I want the longest sight radius possible. I even have my rear sight as far back as it will go, so it actually lays over the charging handle when it's folded (I can still grasp the handle and chamber a round though).

Lastly, yes, I anticipate a zombie apocalypse and welcome it's arrival. But I feel that the majority of my personal zombie slaying will be close quarters where aiming isn't nearly as important. A melted Magpul sight will be the least of my worries.
 
All valid points. First off, the sights were on the rifle when I bought it, so I didn't choose to add polymer sights.

Secondly, I feel like the sight moved back and an empty gas block just wouldn't look good.

Thirdly, I want the longest sight radius possible. I even have my rear sight as far back as it will go, so it actually lays over the charging handle when it's folded (I can still grasp the handle and chamber a round though).

Lastly, yes, I anticipate a zombie apocalypse and welcome it's arrival. But I feel that the majority of my personal zombie slaying will be close quarters where aiming isn't nearly as important. A melted Magpul sight will be the least of my worries.

but... but... head shots! Everybody knows that. You'll need your aimer :-)
 
paddle,

If you ever get a chance to try Troy folding battle sights, do it. They are pricey, but they are great.
 
I think some 'tests' have been done and it holds up fine.

The Magpul and ARMS and related sights have a lot of graphite in the plastic which keeps the plastic from goo-ing down, they tend to get brittle and crack like an old electrical receptacle.

Get them hot, and keep them hot; the P.O.I. will shift a little. But the issue is when the rifle gets bounced; the sight cracks and crumbles.

Ask me how we know......:rolleyes: I will give them their due; they put up with a LOT of nonsense before they fail outright.

For a casual shooter, there is no issue unless you have a mag-dump fetish.
 
The Magpul and ARMS and related sights have a lot of graphite in the plastic which keeps the plastic from goo-ing down, they tend to get brittle and crack like an old electrical receptacle.

Get them hot, and keep them hot; the P.O.I. will shift a little. But the issue is when the rifle gets bounced; the sight cracks and crumbles.

Ask me how we know......:rolleyes: I will give them their due; they put up with a LOT of nonsense before they fail outright.

For a casual shooter, there is no issue unless you have a mag-dump fetish.

Military use?
 
Well it appears it doesn't fit my quad-rail anyway. I have the cheap Ade Advanced Optics rail installed. A light, bipod, etc. attach fine. But I tried to move the MBUS front sight back to the rail just to make you all happy ;), and the screw would not fit in the slot. That rail is supposed to be picatinny/weaver. I wonder why it doesn't fit??
 
That rail is supposed to be picatinny/weaver. I wonder why it doesn't fit??

I have the cheap Ade Advanced Optics rail installed.

You may have answered your own question. Is the rail a Picatinny (MIL-STD-1913), or is it Weaver mount? They are different, with different measurements. Just out of curiosity, try mounting it on different spots... maybe the slot you chose is out of spec.
 
Certain parts on a gun should not be plastic. Your sights are one of them. Everything about the weapons effectiveness is tied to the sights.
 
Certain parts on a gun should not be plastic. Your sights are one of them. Everything about the weapons effectiveness is tied to the sights.

Tell that to Glock, H&K, Sig, S&W, and any other manufacturer with a polymer hand gun.

Magpul sights are very effective, when used per the manufacturer's instructions. Not a very exhaustive test, but the MBUS did fair better. Back Up Iron Sight Drop Test | Kit Up!

ETA: Not a MBUS fan, but for reasons other than durability.
 
Certain parts on a gun should not be plastic. Your sights are one of them. Everything about the weapons effectiveness is tied to the sights.

I use a red dot as my primary sight. You are correct in your assessment though -- when my red dot goes out at the range or gets hit from enemy gunfire, it will be imperative that my back up sights are metal so I can return accurate fire and make it to the truck alive.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top