[...] Worrying about whether or not a chamber throat is out of round is a waste of time [...] /QUOTE]
I did not mean to imply that you would get useful information by measuring out of roundness in S&W throats. I only meant to campare tools.
Incidently, the information you have been posting on .45 Colt throats has been great stuff.
cp1969 said:
[...] I'm not sure what the thinking was behind this [oversize throats] other than the fact that the standard .45 Colt factory load used a swaged, hollow-base design bullet that would swell up to fill any size of cylinder throat. They were also sized .454" for many years. Shooting .454" dia bullets through .452" dia throats isn't the best idea, either, so maybe they were thinking about people shooting OLD ammunition in their new guns.
There is error, not much but some, in using ball gages or telescoping plug gages, there is also error in the measuring instrument itself. [...] and [the] "feel" problem.
The Win. 255gr. RNs with the small flat points have been .456" for well over 100 years and are representitive of common factory loads when Colt, S&W and Ruger started manufacturing .45 Colt revolvers. Compared to that load .458" throats are no more oversize than Model 24, 29, 624 and 629 throats were up until the British owners tightened S&W .44 throats. The gradual change to .452" .45 Colt bullets was primarily responsible for the problem.
Learning a consistant "feel" with measuring tools comes with experience. With plug gauges you can only say the diameter is somewhere between two numbers a thousandth apart. I can take a measurement with less uncertainty than that with ball gauges although it barely matters for throat measurement.
Chubbs said:
You can also slug your chambers and measure them this way. Chubbs
Thats a good idea that eliminates the need for any tools other than your micrometer or calipers. I didn't think of it simply because I've had my small hole gauges for so long.
Best Regards,
Gil