Mid Sized Pickup; Ford Ranger or Chevy Colorado

My opinion is ........ Get the full sized version of either! The smaller pickups while a little cheaper are a lot less truck! I think you will regret buying the small version down the road once you find out that it is NOT anywhere close to the truck the full sized versions are.

I personally prefer the GMC, then the Chevy and then the Ford but that is a personal preference. You should go with your fav. brand but again - go for the full sized Truck.

Agreed, my friends Tundra was comparable to the Tacoma gas wise, but more roomier and macho looking. :D

He gave up the macho, and poorer gas mileage, for a more sedate Ridgeline. :D

In other news, Toyota lies and hides their problems, often. It takes an act of God and NHTSA to make them own up.
 
Last edited:
New as in "new manufacture" or as in used truck "new to me?"

If new manufacture, know that right now the only engine option in the ranger is an I-4 turbo gasser. I would not willingly buy a truck so equipped.

Generally, the small/mid sized truck rankings are as follows:
Toyota Taco
Nissan Frontier
Everything else.

Not sure about the new Chevy Colorados, but the older ones were junk, reliability-wise. Ford stopped making the old Ranger in 2011. The manual tranny I-4 combo would run a long ways. The Ford 3.0 V6 was a dog of a V6. Honda Ridgeline is not a real truck. It can be a terrific vehicle for the right user, but don't make the mistake thinking it is a truck. Jeep whatever, I am not familiar with, but given Fiat owns Jeep, rest assured it will break early & often.

Full Size vs Mid Size
MS will be ~ 2/3 the price OTD of an equivalently-equipped FS. MS and FS 1/2 ton fuler economy will be about the same. You buy mid size if you are not able/willing to shell out FS cash/payments or if you need something smaller than FS.


Best Deal Today
Nissan Frontier. Designed before Fiat screwed up Nissan. Terrific deals to be had. Taco objectively better & newer design, but boy will you pay through the nose for that.
 
I can give you my opinions on my 17 Colorado Z71 for your consideration. I've now owned it for 2 years (was a loaner the dealership sold to me in June 2018 with 3K miles as a new vehicle, never titled). Mine is 2WD and has the long bed, but it should give you a general impression as to what the new ones will be like.

The 3.6 V6 is a good powerplant and has given me zero problems. It has decent power and torque. The 8 speed tranny I am not so fond of however. At around 25K miles I was having shifting issues and it had to be serviced and fluid and filter changed. This was an issue with the 17 models and has been updated to a different fluid according to the dealer and is what they did with mine. Another thing I don't like about the tranny is the shift points the electronics pick for it. Sometimes it seems that it will run the revs up way past you would expect a shift point to be, mostly when you are accelerating slowly to highway speed. Harder acceleration seems to be fine on the shift points though. Another thing that bugs me is when you set up to manually shift; your choice of gears is more of a suggestion than a command to the electronics that control the shifting. The fit and finish on the whole vehicle is pretty decent and the front seats fit me decently. On the Z71 package, the seats are leather trimmed with a durable cloth in the middle of them. The heated seats heat up very quickly and have multiple heat levels as well as heating the whole seat or just the seat back.

As far as mileage goes, it averages around 19-20 mpg running at 75-80 mph on the Interstate. I do have 18 inch tires on mine; they had upgraded them at the dealership when they decided to sell it. With the stock 17 inch tires your mileage might be better.

I also had a Line-X bed liner installed at the Line-X dealer in Lafayette, LA shortly after buying my truck; well worth the cost and it's protecting the bed just fine.

Overall, I like my Colorado just fine. I don't lose much room inside as compared to a full size truck and it's a bit easier to maneuver and park compared to a full size truck. I also like the fact that is doesn't have a turbo in it too.

When I bought this truck, the Ford Ranger wasn't in production. I did look at the Tacoma and the Toyota has much less interior leg room for the back seat as compared to the Colorado. I also looked at the Frontier and it felt dated and they didn't have any V6 versions in stock.

I can give you some impressions on what the turbo 4 engine in the Ford is like though. That 2.3 Ecotec motor is based off technology that Ford and Mazda jointly developed in the 2000's with the Mazdaspeed DISI turbo 4s used in the Mazdaspeed 6 and Mazdaspeed 3. I owned an 07 Mazdaspeed 6 from 07 until I bought my Colorado. The 2.3 Ecotec is the direct descendant of that Mazda motor. In my Speed 6, that motor would come on like gangbusters after about 2500 rpm and pull like crazy to around 6-6.5K, then fall off. The way it made power reminded me of some of the 2 stroke motorcycles I owned in my youth, like "coming on the pipe". I did find that spark plug life was shorter than expected, with me having to do plug changes around 40K miles, but it was easy enough for me to do myself. When I traded the car in, I had around 150,000 miles on the odometer and had no real problems with the motor bedsides shorter plug life. They turbo gave no problems.

Hope this helps you out in your decision making.:)

EDIT: Here is my truck as it sits now, after adding the Roll-N-Lock bed cover and the brush guard.
 
Last edited:
I've been very happy with my Tacoma.

As it sat at the dealership...

HesrQGJ.jpg
 
Just a question without weighing in on the "which is better" debate - did you consider the diesel option for any of these trucks? I am not currently in the market for a smaller truck but I understand that the new small diesels are interesting options.

Because of the towing I do, I need a 3/4-ton truck and have had very good experience with Chevy's since 1988 but my experience isn't likely to be helpful with choosing a new mid-size truck.

I have gone back and done some additional test driving. I'm not typically a diesel pickup fan but I went ahead and drove a diesel Colorado. The truck itself was full loaded and I was very pleased with it, but after driving the diesel and with the extra costs I decided the juice wasn't worth the squeeze.

I see the "you can get a fullsize for the same money" point is raising its ugly head. The thing with a fullsize if that if it's too big for your garage, driveway or where you want to go, it's too big at any price.

Sometimes people want or even need a smaller vehicle, a fact that seems to baffle many, apparently.

That's where I'm at, I just don't want a Silverado or F150 and I've owned both with no complaints. I just don't want a full size pickup.

Tacoma first. No contest. Not even close.

Man, I thought I really, really wanted a Tacoma, but after three test drives it's just not making the impression I was hoping for. It's not like I'm not familiar with them, I used to own a 2005 Tacoma and really liked it.


New as in "new manufacture" or as in used truck "new to me?"

2020 showroom new.

I can give you my opinions on my 17 Colorado Z71 for your consideration. I've now owned it for 2 years (was a loaner the dealership sold to me in June 2018 with 3K miles as a new vehicle, never titled). Mine is 2WD and has the long bed, but it should give you a general impression as to what the new ones will be like.

The 3.6 V6 is a good powerplant and has given me zero problems. . . .

Again, after numerous test drives I'm leading towards a loaded 2020 Colorado LT 4WD 4 door crew cab. I'd be all over the new Ford Ranger but the turbo 4 banger isn't doing it for me. If I was into driving it for a few years and selling it I'd reconsider the Tacoma because they do have good resale, but I usually keep one a while.

I've been impressed with the Chevy 3.6 V6 and of all the dealerships the Chevy guys are working hard to get to the price point or throw in additional options that Ford and Toyota want to charge extra for.

I'm to drive down to Jackson, Mississippi to kick some tires this weekend. I think the local dealerships in north Mississippi are tired of me teasing them. :)
 
Last edited:
Again, after numerous test drives I'm leading towards a loaded 2020 Colorado LT 4WD 4 door crew cab.

My friend that bought one, I'm guessing a 2018 got a black one. Blacked out grill and it came with the bigger off road tires. Not sure what trim level it is but its a really nice one and he loves it.
 
I have gone back and done some additional test driving. I'm not typically a diesel pickup fan but I went ahead and drove a diesel Colorado. The truck itself was full loaded and I was very pleased with it, but after driving the diesel and with the extra costs I decided the juice wasn't worth the squeeze.

I have driven diesels for my entire professional career and since 1995 in the pick-ups that I've personally owned but every one of them has been a V-8 so basically nothing applicable to what is available in the small/mid-size trucks.

I can tell you WHY I own one, however - in 2004 we were hit by three consecutive hurricanes over a period of 6 weeks (Charley, Frances and Jean) and while anyone with a vehicle that used gasoline was either waiting in line all day or completely out of luck getting fuel, there was plenty of diesel to be found because they gave it priority to keep the big trucks running for transporting food, fuel, relief supplies, etc. I never had a problem filling up my tank.
 
Can't attest to anything "new". My 2005 Frontier has all that I (or you?) need: 275 hp, 4WD, 4 doors, decent fuel economy and no problems in 16 years.
 
Honda Ridgeline...

Last summer I was shopping for a Chevy Colorado but inventory at the dealers was a joke. not much selection/availability. looked at GMC Canyon's with the same result. As I was walking out of the GMC dealer I told the salesman that I had to keep shopping since he could not get me what I wanted.

He asked if was going down the road to the Honda dealer, I told him yes as I wanted to check out the Ridgelines. He said thanks for coming in, enjoy your new Honda, you won't be back. I asked him why and he said that he had never had anyone come back after seeing the Ridgeline.

Thirty minutes later I bought a nice 2019 RL and after nearly a year and 10,000+ trouble free miles I cannot imagine buying any other mid size. The Ridgeline was Car and Driver's Mid size truck of the year for 2017, 2018 and yes boys and girls again for 2019.

My RL has the largest bed and the best safety rating in its class. The 8.3 cubic foot trunk under the bed is amazing and while I only need it to be a truck about 10% of the time it always gets the job done. The AWD is awesome and it came with 1,477# of payload and 18 inch wheels. If you have not checked them out you should...
 
Last edited:
When I was in the market I was between the Tacoma and Colorado. After driving the Tacoma, I wasn't impressed with how it drove or the seating position. The Colorado wasn't bad, but I wasn't impressed with the interior. The Ranger was out for me, once they announced it would only have the EcoBoost engine. After they had to replace the engine in my Escape with a little over 30,000 miles, I swore no more turbo engines (or Fords) for me. I drove the RIdgeline on a whim, not planning to get it. Then I bought one :) It's not for everyone, but fits my needs perfectly. You might want to at least test drive one.
 
One other thing I forgot to mention in my post above; fuel tank capacity. The book says 21.0 gallons and if you fill to when it shuts off automatically it will take that much. But if you feed gas in slow after the shutoff functions, you can get another 6 gallons or so in the tank. I've put as much as 26 gallons in my truck and it wasn't out of gas when I started filling it. This gives you a lot of range between gas stations, as you can imagine. But you got to fill as slow as possible once it starts shutting off automatically to get the extra gas in the tank.
 
Back
Top