If you like it and have the cash,buy it. I don’t see these going down in value anytime soon. I have some I thought I paid a bit much for in the past,but ya know, they’ve all gone up in value.Some are up a lot.
Thanks for all the contributed information and opinions.
Prior to posting here, I also posted the same question on a dedicated 1911 site and got very little response. (?!) Go figure.
I’d put this fine group of members up against any, as far as overall knowledge and active firearm interest goes.
-Bill
One Last Look
![]()
as the OP probably already knows the US&S 1911a1 is only second rarest to the Singer... I have zero current market value sense, but doesn't feel wrong to me..
What he said.
From my experience going through CMP will take at least a year. Factor in inflation after 1-2 years to the price of a similar gun from CMP and compare it to the price of the gun you can look at and hold in your hand right now and buy right now.
And for what it's worth, my mixmaster will shoot at least as well as I can hold it and see the sights.
I like the checkered backstrap and checkered hammer…
What magazine(s) come with it? All WWII contract magazines have a stamp on the toe (inside) indicating which of several manufacturers made them. Could be a G , S, or R (General Shaver, Scovil, Risdon). Colt magazines made by another contractor have a C prefix
Having a WWII magazine(s) would effect the price as they have become expensive...
To your point I'm pretty sure that most who buy these relics aren't buying them because they can cut the center out of a target at 15 yards. That's ridiculous. They buy them because they are genuine military surplus and touchstones to the past. I carried one as shore patrol and on watch in the Navy 50 years ago. The one I carried probably had seen the arsenal rebuild a few times also. I've never fired mine and never will. I have a Colt Gold cup for that. I suppose if one never served they probably wouldn't understand that.
I also have a 43 Inland that I rebuilt myself. I shoot that one.
![]()
I've never understood the appeal of these WWII mixmasters. There's zero originality and little military history/provenance since they're just an assembly of parts. The parkerized finishes are, frankly, pretty ugly. Now, a WWI era 1911 (pre 1911a1) as issued and with the nice commercial quality high polish bluing? That's a different matter!
Additionally, those older WWI era 1911s oftenshoot pretty good. The WWII parkerized mixmasters usually shoot very poorly.
One other big factor to consider is that all these parts have been picked over, over, and over again by all the various military marksmanship armorers and gunsmiths. The parts that are left that they are assembling these "stray dogs" from is basically picked over junk.
I got a CMP Service Grade for $1050 and I’m very happy with it. These guns are the real deal. The reason they’ve been rebuilt is they saw use. The GI in Vietnam and Korea had a mixmaster on his hip. Mine is right and shoots quite well. I’d take one of these before any modern 1911.
You forgot WW II.
I didn’t forget. Can’t imagine many 1911’s were rebuilt in WW2, unless they were earlier 1911’s. My Colt was built in March of 1944. Doubt it needed a rebuild in 16 months. I would imagine most of those rebuilt were WW 1 1911’s.
Either way, mine hung from countless GI hips between 1944 and 1976 when it was rebuilt and put away. Mixed up parts and a parkerizatiin don’t change that.