Model 1903 .32 Long Hand Ejector

daveboy

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2024
Messages
205
Reaction score
528
Here is my latest project. I recently won this on an online auction for two and a half bills. It looked pretty rough in the auction photos, but I didn't care about asthetics, so long as it worked okay.

The red flags to me were the absence of the large sideplate screw, and the wrong yoke screw. That told me that someone, who didn't know what they were doing, had taken it apart at some point in the past 115 years.

I received it and the action seemed pretty rough, but it did carry up on all chambers and there was no push off. So, I figured I could work with it. Removing the sideplate, it was obvious that whoever had been in it before, it had been a long, long time ago. The action was dry, with a gummy, crusty oil film on everything (probably long-dried WD-40). Once cleaned up, the only issue I saw was there was a lot of slop in the cylider lock-up. With the hammer and trigger down, you could rotate the cylinder back and forth a little more than I was comfortable with. A close look revealed that the cylinder nothces were slightly rounded with a raised edge. I gently peened those edges back into the slots, and that seemed to tighten it up a little bit.

Next, it was on to asthetics. I boiled and carded everything and that made a huge difference. Applying some Brownells touch-up bluing, using heat and more carding, followed by a soak in diesel fuel, greatly improved the appearance.

Here are a few before photos:
 

Attachments

  • DSC_2049.jpg
    DSC_2049.jpg
    84.9 KB · Views: 34
  • DSC_2045.jpg
    DSC_2045.jpg
    115.7 KB · Views: 37
  • DSC_2052.jpg
    DSC_2052.jpg
    71 KB · Views: 31
  • DSC_2053.jpg
    DSC_2053.jpg
    85.4 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG_2745.jpg
    IMG_2745.jpg
    137.7 KB · Views: 34
Register to hide this ad
Today, I fired her for the first time. I've learned from this group that she was made circa 1910. My guess is she hasn't been fired in many decades. I've never fired a .32 Long (for that matter, I've never fired an I-frame). I was pleasantly surprised at how accurate she was, and also how light the recoil is. Although the grips are tiny, I was able to get my hands on it pretty well. This is my first group, fired at ten yards, double-action, standing. Not match-quality for sure. But, for a gun designed almost 125 years ago, for across the room distances, I think she still functions just the way she was designed. And, she doesn't look too bad for a lady of that vintage. I think I did okay for the money I have invested.
 

Attachments

  • DSC_2056.jpg
    DSC_2056.jpg
    178 KB · Views: 20
  • DSC_2059.jpg
    DSC_2059.jpg
    189.7 KB · Views: 20
  • DSC_2061.jpg
    DSC_2061.jpg
    120.9 KB · Views: 20
  • DSC_2063.jpg
    DSC_2063.jpg
    123.7 KB · Views: 19
  • IMG_2804.jpg
    IMG_2804.jpg
    60.1 KB · Views: 27
I love the .32 revolvers. It looks like you have done a good job making this piece a decent shooter. Congrats! :D I'm looking for one similar to yours. The only .32 S&W long revolvers I have are snubbies; a S&W 1972-vintage 31-1 and a H&R Model 733. I want one with at least a 4-inch barrel.
 
Looks nice! I recently picked up a .32 3rd model as well, but with a 3 1/4 barrel. Haven’t gotten to shoot it yet.

e78c1537c1fbafed52f4a24b823d17b3.jpg
 

Latest posts

Back
Top