Model 52 magazines

Calfed

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
343
Reaction score
1,394
City & State/Province
The Left Coast
I've found myself in the market for magazines for a new Model 52. I've noticed two things...one, the magazines are crazy expensive and two, there seems to be two types of followers...a metal one and a plastic one.

Are there any advantages of one type of follower over the other?
 
I have both types of followers and I haven't noticed any real difference between the two. I would guess that the metal follower would last longer and I'm pretty sure they are more expensive.

One of the spares I picked up recently was slightly bowed and the third round would consistently hang up in the gun. I ended up bubba-ing the follower button (cordless drill, file and sandpaper) to relieve the binding and now it works fine.
 
I guess I'm wondering if the plastic follower has proven to be robust over time.
 
Heck were does one even find a magazine?

They do require some vigilance to find. I got a good deal on a couple at an auction over the weekend.

IcpwKm3.jpg
 
I have seen a number of folks show a preference for the metal follower. My collection of 52 magazines might be right at 50/50. That’s a clue that I make NO distinction, and have never seen a difference between the followers, ever.

I have gotten some mags that don’t feed well — my method to fix them has been to take a 52 magazine that I am dead sure certain feeds well, make note of the feed lip dimensions in multiple places and then (carefully!) bend the feed lips of the troubled magazine until it too functions flawlessly.

This has worked well for me.

If you look under enough rocks for 52 magazines, you will eventually come across one that has been altered to fit more than 5 rounds. This is done by extending the side slots by which the follower is guided. I don’t happen to own any, but I believe that extending the slot at a slight LESS angle is the preferred method of making these work.
 
Back
Top