Model 64-5 project gun

Dieseltech56

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2017
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
3,121
Location
Pittsburgh PA
Last year I picked up a 64-5 DAO round butt from a local store, I rarely shoot anything double action but this gun just stood out to me. I don't believe I had ever seen a DA forged hammer before but later on after I got it home I realized these guns were pretty common. NY used something similar at one point. When I got the grips off I found a decent amount of pitting at the grip line.

frRYsQpl.jpg


Right off the bat I hated that it had a MIM trigger but I never swapped out a trigger before so I looked around for what might be needed. While reading I came across some info stating there was a better chance of having these parts drop in if they came as a matched set.... basically from the same gun. I found a forged hammer/ trigger set on ebay from a 10-10 and installed them with the original hand. Everything worked perfectly, I no longer had a DAO 64. Around this time I also switched out the MIM cylinder release for an old style one.

DASCqKpl.jpg


SoPzVkDl.jpg


After I had done some successful minor gunsmithing the wheels started turning. What else could I do? I have wanted to do my own barrel work for some time now and I envision turning some of my common guns into ones I can't find. I think we all do that, not for profit of course, just for personal gain. I convinced myself to start gathering barrel tools. I got some frame wrenches, barrel chamfer and endface cutters, even the brownells barrel setback tool. I was about ready to start experimenting.

Before that though I needed some parts. When I went hunting for a 3" 64 barrel I actually found a 3" 65 barrel instead. Now the end of the barrel that protrudes from the frame is shorter on a 65 than a 64. This is to allow the longer 65 cylinder to fit. I quickly found out that midway stocks a 65/66 cylinder. Now I'm thinking this is coming together.

I got the 65 barrel, cylinder and laid out the plan. First I pulled both my 65-5 and 64-5 all apart to compare the two. From one gun to the next there is no difference anywhere in the frames or yokes. There is no signs of heat treating from one gun to the other. Since I am fitting a new magnum cylinder I am not worried about its metallurgy.

4bVljrJl.jpg


Now that I have all the parts and tools I believe I'll need to get started I have to figure out the hardest part. Removing the barrel from the frame. My first attempt failed. I made barrel blocks out of 2x4 pieces of pine. The wood was too soft and I had the grain going parallel to the barrel. The blocks broke apart before I even put half the pressure needed to remove the barrel.

Next I cut some oak blocks with the grain running perpendicular to the barrel. This was the ticket. The barrel unthreaded with a decent amount of effort but thankfully the frame and threads survived.

8vzMrbll.jpg


Now it was time to see how the new barrel fit. I hand tightened the old barrel onto the frame to see where it indexed. When I removed it and put the new barrel on I found it indexed short of where the old one did. I decided to use the barrel setback tool to get my new barrel closer to the old one. I only had to trim a few thousands off the new barrel and I decided to make it hand tighten a little bit past the original one. I am suspicious of the thin K frame threaded portion of the barrel. I would say I was about 1/10 of a turn shy of 12 o'clock with the barrel hand tightened. I was referencing the Kuhnhausen book while doing this.

As I found out when installing the barrel the rest of the way I am glad I chose to index it were I did. The barrel was definitely tight going on. I managed to get it lined up perfectly the first time. Beginners luck I suppose.

NQDNv7Jl.jpg



Now came time to install the new cylinder and original yoke. I really didn't know what to expect here. Surprisingly the cylinder closed but it was tight up against the barrel. I used the Brownell's 90 degree end face cutter to trim the barrel back 3-4 thousandths to get me started.

slQfL0ml.jpg


Now the cylinder closed good but it was bound up when cycling the action. I was convinced I messed something up but I came to realize through trial and error that my new cylinder just wasn't as deep as the original. My yoke was too long.

When I installed the cylinder and ejector into the gun with no yoke the action cycled fine so I knew the ejector rod length was okay. When I installed the old cylinder back onto the ejector rod and put it in the gun with the yoke the action cycled fine too. The new cylinder and old yoke weren't liking each other, my endshake was zero.

I did wind up filing a few thousandths off the yoke face to get the cylinder freed up. Several times I put black sharpie on the yoke face and cycled the action a bunch of times to see where to file. I have already ordered a yoke alignment gauge to make sure nothing is going on there but I think it's okay.


Right now everything seems good but I am not ready to shoot this gun yet. I still need to get a range rod and make sure the chambers are in alignment. The eyeball says it looks okay but I want to make sure. I also have not done anything with the forcing cone. The factory cone is most likely okay but a little shallow, I'll leave it if the match range rod passes. Otherwise I'll go with a 5 degree chamfer. The thin spot at 6 o'clock on the barrel makes me think it's not wise to go with too big of an angle. Factory I believe is 7-8 degrees but no one sells a cutter or gauge that angle.


Here is the gun now with the 64 old parts

2zrQUBQl.jpg


And here are the closeups

cFHQHNbl.jpg


eilhT5Tl.jpg


I also do not recommend doing this to save money or make a profit. I have hundreds of dollars invested in these barrel tools and a strong mechanical background. I am only doing this for myself and this gun will not be getting sold. I actually debated posting this because I do not want to see anything negative to come from this.
 
Register to hide this ad
No negativity here - Very good job!

Sometimes you do a project to get something you can't get any other way. Sometimes it's just to see if you can do it.

If you are happy, it's all good.

I agree - now you need to post a range report.

Have a good weekend,
Bob S.
 
I agree a range report is in order. If it doesn't shoot it won't be anything but a nice paper weight. I want to make sure everything checks out first though so it does have a chance of shooting good from the start.
 
I had a similar project done on a 64-6. Really, it was a simpler project than yours. The gun smith shortened the original barrel 4" to 3", slab sided it and milled a Novak slot to install a Dawson Precision 1911 fiber optic front sight. Then he reinstalled the barrel which corrected the factory over indexing.

When I got it back I was pleased, but the original cylinder was really beat up and the carry up was slow on one or two of the charge holes. So I continued "down the rabbit hole" and bought a new cylinder and extractor. I didn't realize the new style extractors have to be hand fitted, so off the S&W it went.

After all this I thought, for all the money I've spent and time it took, I could have bought a new S&W 3" revolver. But, as you note I didn't do this to save money or try to profit on sale. I did it because it was gratifying and, a little less painless because I could spread the cost over time.

Anyway, I'm very impressed by the job you did on your 64-5! I suppose now you have a "convertible". I'm thinking you should be able to switch out the double/single action hammer for the factory DAO hammer. Funny but many prefer the factory DAO hammers on 3" barrel 64's a 10's.

One last question will you be shooting .357 magnums?

Jay
 
What a great project and I appreciate you writing it up. Waiting to hear how the alignment goes and then the range report. Thank You!
 
I will shoot magnums out of it but no more than any other older K frame. I think it will handle them just fine, no 125 grainers though.

Spreading the cost out over time was a big thing for me, plus I have other guns that need work too. I want to perform the same work to a model 629-5 I have. Plus a Model 29 I have that could badly use a barrel setback. I wanted to cut my teeth a little less expensive gun in case things didn't go well. Now that I know what I'm up against I'm not particularly worried.

I hadn't thought about it but I could put the DAO hammer back in, then the gun would truly be unique.
 
Matt,

I don't mean to steal your thead, but I thought If I posted pics of the conversion (I had done for me- not as clever as you) they might be helpful;

Here's the donor 64-6, which looks familiar to yours, but I like your Uncle Mike's grips:

42369720410_3e0c98eba4_c.jpg


And after the barrel work, with some homemade woody stocks ( first effort,the next set will be better):

42369723450_7f25a28565_c.jpg


Advantage yours- 1) you did it: 2) converted a .38 Special to a .357 Magnum, 3) you were able to retain the original front sight (which I prefer) and 4) you did your conversion without having to slab side the barrel to remove the off center, cut short, roll marks!

Unlike you, I was happy with the DOA hammer, but thought why not buy a new MIM double/single action (on sale at the time for $24.00 at MidwayUSA Close out.) I opened up the 64 this weekend to try install it only to discover that I was missing a piece, the stirrup that the mainspring hooks on to! Dang-cost more to ship than the purchase price, so...put that off for a bit.
 
Last edited:
I really don't mind the look of a cut down slab sided barrel. I was thinking of having that done to my now removed 4" just to have a spare. The work probably doesn't cost any more than buying an actual 3" barrel.

Today I got my yoke alignment tool and I purchased a new ejector rod to go with it. I don't know what the deal with my 64-5 was but the old rod had a slight S bend in it and the yoke was out of alignment just a hair. Once I beat the yoke back in with a soft lead ingot the cylinder really started spinning nice and closes great now. Some of that might be the new rod too. When I checked my 64-6 that I got from Centerfire Systems the yoke was already in perfect alignment.

The range rods are ordered too. We'll know soon if this thing is okay to shoot.
 
Last edited:
Nice job on that Mod 64. Wish I had the talent to do something professional like that. Here's my cut down 64. I'm such a Bubba. :(

 
Thanks for your kind remarks. I like the looks of single action revolver barrels. Some people are confused when they first see it. Then they realize the entire barrel has been smoothed out except for the ejector rod lug. This was also converted to a round butt grip frame. This was a very cheap police trade-in Model 64-3.
 
Good news and bad news on the range rod test. The good news is the match rod passes through the whole barrel without restriction. No thread choke.

The bad news is the service rod ticks 2 cylinders and the match rod ticks 4. All on the same side, the right side if you're looking down the gun(barrel pointed away).

I checked a few other guns too. My 64-6 three inch from centerfire systems.... Service rod passes all cylinders. Match rod gets hung up in the bore from thread choke at the frame. My 686-4 2.5 and 640-1 both pass the match rod on all cylinders.

I'm a little disappointed my new 65 cylinder does not line up. Correct me if I'm wrong but the hand does not influence how far the cylinder advances, just that it makes it to the notch then it moves out of the way? The only influence on cylinder alignment other than the yoke would be the cylinder stop correct?

Edit - Checked a few more guns. My 686-4 8 3/8s and 686-3 6 inch both pass the match rod. My 686-1 4 inch the match rod doesn't fit in the bore at all, service rod passes. My 686 no dash 4 inch is a huge disappointment. The match rod gets stuck at the frame from thread choke and the service rod ticks every chamber. I would have never known from shooting it, it seems to shoot just fine and doesn't spit.
 
Last edited:
Okay another update. I got the gun fixed, better than I could ever have hoped. Long story short it wound up being the original cylinder stop.

First I held the cylinder stop down with a .015" feeler gauge while using the range rod to make sure I didn't have any vertical misalignment. All was good there. I was able to get the rod in every time with no side to side influence.


Then I tried a narrower hand. The hand I have in the gun is .095" thick and it advances the cylinder good. I tried a .092" hand and while the timing was bare minimum it did nothing to correct any possible over advancement issues. Back in the .095" hand went.

Now what happened next I cannot explain. I remembered that I had already purchased an oversized cylinder stop for my 29-3 which had a unlocking problem during recoil. When I found the stop was way oversized for those cylinder notches I put it back in the bag and stashed it away. I had also hoarded away an extra blue cyl stop spring.


Now much to my surprise when I test fitted the oversized cylinder stop to my new 65 cylinder the stop fit perfectly in the notches. Just enough clearance. So I thought, lets see if it fits the window. When it did without dragging I reassembled the gun with a new spring in place. Wouldn't you know it not only is my side to side play much tighter but my match range rod only ticks one cylinder now. The service rod hits none.


Now my original cylinder stop was .100" thick and the new oversized one is .105". What baffles me is not only does it fit the window good without any filing but it also fits the brand new cylinder perfectly. What are the odds?

Anyways I think I'm happy. If I have a chance tomorrow I'll try to shoot it.
 
Minor update today. I got to shoot the gun. I'm happy to report that it shot flawlessly, perfect point of aim with 38 specials. Slight 6 o'clock hold with 357 magnums. I'm really happy it shoots straight.


I don't currently have a range to shoot at so I don't get much time do extensive testing or data collecting. Hopefully I'll get to shoot it again soon.
 
Matt, my hat is off to you for having the skill (and guts) to try something so involved. I love three-inch K-frames, but I've neither the skills nor the patience to attempt something like that. So when I found myself with a few extra 4" Model 64's, I decided to make one into an off-duty carry gun. I cut my teeth on S&W revolvers in the 70's and 80's and learned to shoot DA as a course of habit, so all that was needed was to have a new barrel fitted. I set aside the one with the best trigger pull, then while searching for a three-inch barrel I came across a new trigger and hand, so I snagged those too.

A man's got to know his limitations, so I took everything to a local 'smith and had it all put together for a nominal fee, then added a set of Spegel stocks to complete the package. The gun is as slick as a greased tadpole, shoots to the sights, and fits me perfectly. Since he now wears a shorter barrel, I named him Bob.



Shown here with my M65-3, they make a nice pair. The 65 has now been retired, it had a rough life before I got it, and now that I have Bob it can rest easy.

 
Back
Top