Good Afternoon All,
In another thread I discussed picking up a 1937 38/44 Heavy Duty, and last evening after work she came home. The gun is in pretty good condition overall aside from having a bit of honest finish wear and couple spots of minor pitting, probably from being left in a damp holster for too long or maybe a gun socknor something. She also has the wrong grips, instead of the diamond magnas it would have shipped with, she has a nice 70s or 80s vintage set of S&W factory Target grips, that while not being original, still feel pretty good in the hand.
The action locks up tight and in time as far as I can tell, no hammer push off, and only tiny little bit of endshake and cylinder play, though I haven't been to the range with it yet. This however brings me to my first question: The action strikes me a different when compared to the more modern post-war S&W revolvers I've owned. This is the first pre-war S&W in my collection, and also the first long action as well. It seems to me on a double action pull, the cylinder rotates into position and locks up faster than it does in a short action. Is this perception only because of the extra hammer travel? Am I just crazy?
Also, on a related note, I did notice something else about the action: There is an audible click when I put pressure on the trigger at the start of a pull, or if i put a finger on the hammer to draw it back for a single action pull. What i believe may be happening is that the hammer is not fully returning to its rest position, and the click is maybe the sear or part of trigger dropping into place. The hammer is returning to a safe position though, as i cannot physically push it forward once the action has be actuated. Could this be a sign of a worn main spring or rebound spring? I don't believe there's any replacement parts in this revolver at all, everytging appears original, however I haven't been inside. The screws have indicators of having all been turned at one time or another, but the side plate doesn't look like it's ever been out or at least not in a very long time.
Thoughts? Also, I'll add photos after work.
Sent from my SM-N976V using Tapatalk
In another thread I discussed picking up a 1937 38/44 Heavy Duty, and last evening after work she came home. The gun is in pretty good condition overall aside from having a bit of honest finish wear and couple spots of minor pitting, probably from being left in a damp holster for too long or maybe a gun socknor something. She also has the wrong grips, instead of the diamond magnas it would have shipped with, she has a nice 70s or 80s vintage set of S&W factory Target grips, that while not being original, still feel pretty good in the hand.
The action locks up tight and in time as far as I can tell, no hammer push off, and only tiny little bit of endshake and cylinder play, though I haven't been to the range with it yet. This however brings me to my first question: The action strikes me a different when compared to the more modern post-war S&W revolvers I've owned. This is the first pre-war S&W in my collection, and also the first long action as well. It seems to me on a double action pull, the cylinder rotates into position and locks up faster than it does in a short action. Is this perception only because of the extra hammer travel? Am I just crazy?
Also, on a related note, I did notice something else about the action: There is an audible click when I put pressure on the trigger at the start of a pull, or if i put a finger on the hammer to draw it back for a single action pull. What i believe may be happening is that the hammer is not fully returning to its rest position, and the click is maybe the sear or part of trigger dropping into place. The hammer is returning to a safe position though, as i cannot physically push it forward once the action has be actuated. Could this be a sign of a worn main spring or rebound spring? I don't believe there's any replacement parts in this revolver at all, everytging appears original, however I haven't been inside. The screws have indicators of having all been turned at one time or another, but the side plate doesn't look like it's ever been out or at least not in a very long time.
Thoughts? Also, I'll add photos after work.
Sent from my SM-N976V using Tapatalk







Last edited: