Mt Gun vs Model 18

41special

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
211
Reaction score
208
Location
Libby MT
So who here would give up (as in sell) their vintage S&W Model 18 to finance a new Mt Gun in 22 LR?

Mine is a keeper, it shoots CCI subsonic HP into tiny groups and kills grouse & pesky Montana Turkeys with headshots aplomb.

I'd look at a new manufactured Mountain Gun in 45 Colt for sure, but in 22.......

I guess a well heeled gent could have both, and throw in a new Colt, but why?
 
Register to hide this ad
I will never sell my vintage M18 to finance anything. I love that little gun, and I inherited it from my late father, so it has extra worth to me way beyond its "book" value.

I've never asked myself "why?" when contemplating buying any gun, nor have I ever let the fact I already have multiple others in the same chambering sway my decision to buy, whether or not it had any legitimate purpose, or filled any particular "need." My only considerations were whether I liked it, whether I liked it enough to pay the asking price, and whether I could afford it.

I personally think you should keep your M18, buy a .22 Mountain Gun, AND buy a new Colt. Life is short, live a little!
 
Why buy one? Just because I can. I have a thing for SW rimfires and seem to collect/accumulate multiple examples of them. From a pure user/practical point of view, the OP is 100% correct. His 18 has served him well and why get rid of proven woodland companion. I wouldn't. I feel like that when it comes to my other firearms endeavors. Take my quail gun for example. This early production 20 gauge Browning Citori Superlght (pre interchangeable choke) I bought new in the 70's has been through thousands of both miles and birds. Despite being oiled at the end of each hunting day, there is not one iota of bluing left on the lower receiver and the stock is dented and worn. It is beautiful! No way I would trade it for a new, shiny one.

For some strange reason, I can't make myself put that kind of wear on my beautiful, vintage pristine blued Smith rimfires (17,18,34,51,etc) when stainless options are also available in the same formats for my hunting and field carry needs. So I have also ended up with a 63, a 651, a 617, etc. through the years. My blued ones have remained relatively prestine other than worn ejector rod bluing from shooting them a LOT on my home range.

There is no right or wrong here. We all spend our resources differently and our priorities/interests differ. BTW, my new 617 Mountain Gun showed up at my dealer yesterday for a pickup this afternoon. I have feeling the 18 will get shot as much as ever and the Mountain Gun will get holstered and carried a lot afield.
 
Last edited:
Foolish to sell an older S&W that shoots tiny groups to buy a new one with hopes it will shoot as well. bird in hand, pig in a poke...

Now, if I wanted a new one, I'd buy it, shoot it, and keep whichever you like more/shoot better. ...
 
My serious rimfire revolvers are a 6" 48-2 and a 4" 63 no dash.

Years ago I shot my best friends 18 quite a bit. The .22 CM has slowly worked it's way to the top of my "gotta get me one" list. When I find mine, it won't be going anywhere.
 
18-3 or 4" 48-3. That is the question? Same condition same price. Which would you choose. Seems like 48 would be worth more and appreciate more.
 
Might be just me, but I would not trade any old S&W, in decent shape, for any new S&W! I might someday consider buying a new S&W but only because money seems worth less today than it used to be.

Still, to each their own!

Riposte
 
Back
Top