Klein Helmer
Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 146
- Reaction score
- 26
Whether it comes from personal conversation or the internet, it seems the conventional wisdom is that N Frame revolvers are, for a number of reasons, unfit for carrying (particularly CC). I am likely not the first to do so, and I will certainly not be the most knowledgeable, but I would like to humbly offer my dissenting opinion. I will speak on my personal experience as it pertains to what I have taken to be the two most common objections to carrying an N Frame, i.e., the physical drawbacks stemming from the heft and weight of the piece, and the aesthetic issues regarding difficulty in concealing it.
I'll start with weight. SOOO many people told me, "Oh boy, you're going to get tired of lugging that huge thing around within a week, snirk snirk." What? Do all of you guys have little birdy arms? (kidding...) Anyway, I've been shoulder carrying my stainless, six inch 629 for over a month now and I love the way it feels. I feel that big smoke wagon resting under my arm and know that I'll be ready the next time a Grizzly wanders into the haberdashery. Maybe my perspective is unique, as I had been renting and shooting an N Frame before I had ever had a gun, and had only ever planned to carry one, so it didn't seem cumbersome relative to having worn something smaller.
With regard to concealment, I was legitimately shocked the first time I put on a sport coat, suit jacket, and hoodie while wearing the gun. From everything I had heard, I was half expecting to see a bulge so outrageous that I would have to eat crow and get a different gun. I carry my gun under my left shoulder, and regardless of the garment (so long as it isn't a very light fabric), the impression of the gun is pretty modest. The outline of the but of the grips is visible, but is not protruding far and really does seem subtle. I live in a predominantly liberal metropolitan area, and I would expect most people (as I once did before changing my views on guns) to recoil at the sight of a giant .44 magnum. To this point, I have not picked up on anyone noticing it. I will acknowledge, knowing it is there myself, that I can see it - so too would I imagine could someone familiar with firearms. So to be completely honest, this method of carrying might better be designated "covered carrying" than concealed, but in my case the difference has been nominal.
So I just wanted to come in here and congratulate all the other broad shouldered behemoths in here who have gone against the grain and equipped themselves with a monster worthy of such a description.
I'll start with weight. SOOO many people told me, "Oh boy, you're going to get tired of lugging that huge thing around within a week, snirk snirk." What? Do all of you guys have little birdy arms? (kidding...) Anyway, I've been shoulder carrying my stainless, six inch 629 for over a month now and I love the way it feels. I feel that big smoke wagon resting under my arm and know that I'll be ready the next time a Grizzly wanders into the haberdashery. Maybe my perspective is unique, as I had been renting and shooting an N Frame before I had ever had a gun, and had only ever planned to carry one, so it didn't seem cumbersome relative to having worn something smaller.
With regard to concealment, I was legitimately shocked the first time I put on a sport coat, suit jacket, and hoodie while wearing the gun. From everything I had heard, I was half expecting to see a bulge so outrageous that I would have to eat crow and get a different gun. I carry my gun under my left shoulder, and regardless of the garment (so long as it isn't a very light fabric), the impression of the gun is pretty modest. The outline of the but of the grips is visible, but is not protruding far and really does seem subtle. I live in a predominantly liberal metropolitan area, and I would expect most people (as I once did before changing my views on guns) to recoil at the sight of a giant .44 magnum. To this point, I have not picked up on anyone noticing it. I will acknowledge, knowing it is there myself, that I can see it - so too would I imagine could someone familiar with firearms. So to be completely honest, this method of carrying might better be designated "covered carrying" than concealed, but in my case the difference has been nominal.
So I just wanted to come in here and congratulate all the other broad shouldered behemoths in here who have gone against the grain and equipped themselves with a monster worthy of such a description.

Last edited: