N Y Case to be heard tomorrow

JMHO

definitely a complete loss with no way of preventing reinstatement of previous restrictions - N.J. may issue has been has been fought + defeated for decades now , what makes anyone believe it will be any different now ? -
 
definitely a complete loss with no way of preventing reinstatement of previous restrictions - N.J. may issue has been has been fought + defeated for decades now , what makes anyone believe it will be any different now ? -

Supreme Court let the appeal of the New Jersey may issue law sit in limbo since last May. Today, that case was distributed for Conference on May 1, and it is possible that the Supreme Court will agree to hear that appeal, which would be the very first time the Supreme Court has taken up that issue.
 
reality

judging by attitude by justices on NYC case it will be another go nowhere case - until complete political + government change in this state nothing will change - the NRA + state associations have done nothing but accept donations + provide lip service here - the last thing the state association accomplished was using NJ members money to win a legal case in New Hampshire allowing CCW permits to be issued to out of state residents , so the association president could renew his ! - not one real efforts made here 30 + years since assault weapons ban - other organizations have made more efforts then NRA or state associations - the restrictions signed into law this past fall are an ongoing example of how government + politics work here -
 
The possibly very significant case of N Y City Versus New York State Rifle and Pistol Association will be heard by SCOTUS tomorrow. At issue are the idiotic and draconian rules that the NYPD places (placed) on legal premesis handgun permit holders. The city is trying to weasle around a ruling by amending their rules and then declaring the issue is moot. The justices have agreed to hear the case anyway. The U. S. government has taken the official position that the issue is NOT moot because members of the NYSRPA could still attempt claims for damages against the "old" law. Approximately 50 amicus briefs have already been filed with the court in the case. It could be interesting.

I have not been following this case. Are you stating that the NYSRPA is asking for REPARATIONS for something that was done to them under a law that no longer allows those actions? I think they might want to be careful in what they ask for...

I am very cautious when it comes to "The Law of Unintended Consequences"!
 
Back
Top