I wouldn't be surprised if he stole the thing, or found it in an abandoned house sitting on a piece of newspaper with an ad for Barnes Miracle Elixir, and started fantasizing about his custom gun and winning national championships. Objectively that would be just as likely as there being a talented gunsmith named Barnes, of such prominence that Maj. Hatcher was familiar with him, that there is no record of anywhere.
Well, I don't yet know that there is "no record . . . anywhere" of a talented gunsmith named Barnes, circa 1922. So far, my only investigations into that question have been this thread, and some googling -- hardly exhaustive research. I do intend to make some other inquiries as time allows.
I've spent a little more time looking into the Wagner claims of a winning some national competition, but I surely don't feel that I have covered the ground sufficiently to issue a verdict of prevarication or any other verdict. There was a great deal of competitive target shooting going on in the USA back in that era, and if somebody has assembled a compendium on the bright lights (other than the members of the Olympic teams), I haven't found it yet. Recently I signed up for a couple of subscription document-archive services so that I could pursue some of these little research projects, but I haven't had time yet to master those tools.
As to the ammo reloading issue, it's an advanced experimenter that might try 14 different loads for his pet piece. Not something a casual reloader would do, especially on a shoestring, not something a re-manufacturer would do if they expected to make any profit, and completely implausible to do so for 160 different calibers.
I have limited interest in the reloading aspect, but if any reader personally utilized Mr. Wagner's handloading service ("Wagner's Gunroom"), late 1940s to sometime in the 1960s, I hope he will post here. There is a substantial likelihood of garbled information in a newspaper piece based on an interview on a technical subject, conducted by a reporter probably young and unversed in the subject, especially when the interviewee is a 90-year-old man with failing memory.
Last edited: