I picked up a 9mm 2.0 and it fits in several of my 9c holsters so I am wearing it around the house. In waist band at 5 o'clock and it is rubbing my skin raw after only three hours had to take it off.
Its a full size but geez if the new c models are this rough I would need a different holster.
The holster I tried to use is a Galco King Tuck. I also have a combat master but its a OWB holster so it shouldn't be a problem.
Am I doing something wrong or missing something?
Apparently, the folks at S&W don't keep up with the competition. Glock tried its RTF2 and it was so bad that, apart from the Vickers Special Editions, it was discontinued. The troopers in Missouri were having holes rubbed in the sleeves of their uniform shirts just from their sleeves making contact with the RTF2 grip frame during walking.
A grip frame that is like fine sandpaper just doesn't do it for me.
After the excessively long wait for the 2.0, I was a bit underwhelmed when the new 2.0 pistol had the awful grip texture, and the PC sear, which could have been put in as a "rolling change" during ordinary production at any point in production. Likewise for the new grip shell. Since S&W now owns the molding company, a new texturing pattern could have been put on at any time.
What I really wanted was the type of modularity that the SIG P320 has with its fire control unit.
The Beretta APX ups the ante on SIG by selling one grip shell which has interchangeable back straps so the user does not have to buy additional grip shells in order to fit the weapon to the user's hand.
As the song goes, "you can't always get what you want."
