New found respect - the 4" 686

I have a bone stock 686-5 I bought from Mark at Summit Gun Brokers, absolutely love it, I shoot it LOTS, and like it better than (sacriligous words to follow) than a K frame .357! I love my M-28, but the 686 is a keeper! Enjoy...
 
Yes I like the 686+ gives you that extra shot. Here is my wifes favorite.
guns025.jpg

And here is one of mine.
guns029.jpg
 
That is a J point sight and yes they make a mount for S&W revolvers and it only takes a few minutes to install. My wife loves it.
 
Here's mine, a no dash from 84.

SW010.jpg


I have Hogue rubber grips on it now, which don't look as nice but I like the feel.
 
L frames are great! I really like the balance of the 4" versions.

Here's the 686-2 I had until I sold it last month.



Here's what I bought with the proceeds.



Truth be told, I prefer the 586 and it shoots better for me with cast loads. This piece eats up 170g Keiths 358429 with unholy amounts of W296 behind them. I have also found it to like 160g SWC 358160 w/o the gas check over 5g W231. Real crowd pleaser.
icon_smile.gif
 
The M-686 is stainless, and the M-27/28 aren't. And their heavier cylinders wear the timing faster.
 
I've got two 686s, both of recent vintage (an SSR 4" and a -6 6") and I love them both. I can't say enough about their accuracy, their smooth triggers, and their superb feel. Over the years I've bought and sold many guns but I've never found anything that I like as much as these two.

Recently, I had an opportunity to fire a Performance Center 627. I'd heard a lot of good things about the gun and I've read numerous laudatory comments about it on this forum, so I really expected something special. To my surprise, I wasn't really all that blown away by it. It has a nice trigger and it's extremely accurate. But, that doesn't make it any better than either of my 686s. It didn't seem to absorb recoil any better than the 686s. And, as for its 8-round capacity versus my two six shooters, all I can say is that I tend to count to six when I shoot, so the extra two didn't do all that much for me. I'd thought about buying a 627 before I tried it but, now, I'm content to stick with my 686s.
 
I agree that the L frames are great shooters. Clark/Miculek did an action job on a new 6" 686 for me several years ago. I just acquired a used 4" 586 that, for me, is very comfortable to shoot.
 
I love the 4" 686's. However, I HATE the hogues that come on them. I think dad's Christmas present this year is going to be a set of Ahrends Retro Targets for his 686.
icon_cool.gif
 
Nice looking L's, gents.

The first nice revolver I owned was a 586, 6". Used to take golf balls out to the range and shoot 'em 'til they disappeared- either out of sight or in a million bits. Unfortunately, a gunsmith I left the gun with lost it. That's right, lost it. Fnally figured he must of accidently sent it out with a load of guns for "disposal", whatever that means. He did make good for it, sent me a check for $500,and this was close to 20 years ago. Just one more of the guns I still miss
icon_frown.gif


But, for now, here's my one and only L-frame (I post this alot, but I like it even more
icon_biggrin.gif
):

686-4 from the Performance Center

SW686-45.jpg


SW686-44.jpg


They are real shooters, even the snubs!
 
Back
Top