New M&P 40c has the dreaded slide "Ker-Chunk!" Has anyone solved this problem yet?

JPucci

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2016
Messages
46
Reaction score
29
Location
Seattle, WA
New M&P 40c has the dreaded slide "Ker-Chunk!" Has anyone solved this problem yet?

Hey all,

The title says it all...

I have a brand new M&P 40c no thumb safety, no internal lock, but it has a magazine lock that I removed without issue.

The primary observation is an intermittent slide sluggishness/"ker-chunk". When firing, you can feel and see the slide move very slowly back and then forward into battery.

At times, the slide hangs up while chambering the next round with the nose of the round seemingly stuck on the feed ramp followed by a snap into battery a couple of seconds later. For what it's worth, there are no other signs of trouble with this gun...it's very accurate if you can get past this issue.

I've put 270 rounds through her so far out of three 10-round magazines. My usual stress test before putting a pistol into my carry rotation is 250 rounds of mixed ammo followed by a box of my carry ammo, so she's seen 100 rounds of Federal 180gr, 50 rounds of PMC Bronze 180gr, 50 rounds of Herter's 180gr, 50 rounds of Blazer 180gr, and 20 rounds of Federal HST 180gr.

Out of those 270 rounds, I had three failures to feed where I had to manually clear the round, several delayed chamberings, and roughly 30-40% of all rounds displaying the "ker-chunk" sluggishness.

While cycling the slide through full magazines of ammo on the bench, there is a reasonably consistent feature of the 5th through 9th rounds have more resistance to chambering from a manual slide actuation.

Out of approximately 100 "dry cycles" on the bench, I observed 8 failures to feed, where the round was stuck on the feed ramp and several FTE's, although the FTE's don't show up in live firing, so this may just be me not pulling the slide back forcefully enough.

I know that this isn't a new problem and have done a ton of research on it in this and other forums. My best references so far are linked below and discuss all of the observations that I've experienced myself:

http://smith-wessonforum.com/smith-wesson-m-p-pistols/268843-40c-firing-issue.html

http://smith-wessonforum.com/smith-wesson-m-p-pistols/298108-m-p-40c-sluggish-slide.html

These threads are years old though, so I figured I'd start this one to see if anyone got to root cause of this behavior since then.

My best guess right now is that the magazines play a critical role in the behavior of my 40c, so I've got some new ones on order, but did anyone ever figure out if the recoil spring plays a role? I haven't had any premature lock-backs like others have had, so I don't think my slide lock spring is a part of the issue...

Anyway, sorry for the long post. Is there anyone out there that has definitively solved this problem?

Cheers,
- Justin
 
Register to hide this ad
Bumping up for some more visibility. The forum has been very busy lately! :)

Anyone at all that has experience with this problem or fixing it?
 
An easy basic thing to try is polishing the feed ramp. If that doesn't do it, a trip to S&W is warranted. And don't worry about sending it in with a polished ramp. I sent my Shield in with a polished ramp, with no issue.
 
Update:

On your recommendation, Jim, I took a look at the feed ramp and did find it to be relatively rough. You could clearly see and feel the machining marks, which run perpendicular to the direction of travel up the ramp.

I compared it using a sewing needle to my M&P9 FS, M&P45c, and M&P Shield 45 and found it to be the worst of the bunch by far. So, she got a bit of a polish job...

400 grit, 600 grit, 800 grit, 0000 steel wool, and then Mother's mag polish got the ramp to a nice and shiny finish with no perceptible machining roughness using the needle test again. Re-running the dry cycling test that I spoke of in the OP, there were no particularly egregious cycles where the round felt like it was dragging into the chamber.

Also, after doing some more research, there seems to be a common theme surrounding magazine spring tension. I have three 10-round mags and decided that I'd take one and cut two coils off of it's spring. Why? Because it's worth the experiment and mags are relatively cheap if I need to buy a new one after botching this one... ;)

Ok, let's cut to the chase...the data. I went to range today and put another 370 rounds down range:

250 Blazer Brass (180gr round-nosed flat point)
100 Sellier & Bellot (180gr truncated cone)
20 Federal HST (180gr hollow point)

Here's what I found:

1. The modified mag spring (let's call it Mag #1) performed relatively well compared to the others.

Out of 130 rounds, only 3 were observed to have a "sluggish" slide and 1 had a FTF where the round got stuck in the mag lips and didn't chamber (4/130 = 3%).

All 4 of those "malfunctions" were with the Blazer RNFP rounds.

2. The other two stock mag springs performed as follows:

Mag #2 - 6/90 or 7% malfunctioned (all "sluggish" slides), 4/6 from Blazer RNFP, 2/6 from S&B TC. 3/6 on round #1, 1/6 on round #4, and 2/6 on rounds #6 and #7.

Mag #3 - 13/130 or 10% malfunctioned (all "sluggish" slides), 12/13 from Blazer RNFP, 1/13 from S&B TC. 2/13 on round #5, 4/13 on round #6, 7/13 on round #7.

Interestingly enough, all of the Federal HST's fed fine and showed no "sluggishness."

I will say that from the first 270 rounds in the OP to this range session, I see an improvement. I only had one FTF compared to 3 on the first session and my "sluggish" occurrences are down from 30-40% to about 6%. Keep in mind that there's error inherent in the comparison of the two range sessions because I didn't keep detailed notes the first time like I did today, but still...

Preliminary conclusions?

It would seem as if the feed ramp polishing had the effect of reducing the number of instances of "sluggishness" in the slide; however, the mag springs definitely do play a roll in all of this.

Reading back through the threads that I linked above, others found that the "sluggishness" always happened on rounds 5-9 in a 10-round magazine, which is pretty consistent with my findings.

The shape of the projectile also seems to have an effect with the RNFP's causing "sluggishness" 6x more often than the truncated cones and hollow points.

It's not solved yet and she's definitely not getting into the carry rotation yet either, but I feel like I'm making some progress.

Thoughts? Next steps?

Thanks ahead of time for the help!

Cheers,
- Justin
 

Latest posts

Back
Top