New Python 4.25”

[MSD2343]

Finally pulled the trigger on a new Python in the 4.25 inch barrel. The finish on the gun is beautiful and appears to be flawlessly executed. I ran about 100 rounds through it, mostly 38s but a few cylinders’ worth of 158 grain .357s also. Pleased to report the sights came out of the box dead center on, we’ll see how long that lasts with the now infamous loosey-goosey rear sight.

As has been noted by many others, the DA pull is quite impressive, much lighter than my high mileage Model 27-9 and even a bit lighter than my Model 19-3. SA is surprisingly heavy, but I rarely ever shoot in SA. I was disappointed to note that the edges of the trigger are uncomfortably sharp. So much so, I’m thinking of maybe trying some Talon Grip tape on it to try to remedy.

As the Python weighs-in at the same 42 ounces as my 4 inch Model 27 (third photo), I shot them side by side for comparison. The 27 definitely tames .357 recoil more effectively than the Python.

Overall, very happy with the purchase, with minor deductions for the rear sight (no surprise) and the sharp edges on the trigger.

 

[CH4]

Welcome to the new Python club. I appreciate the old and new Pythons for what they are; every good collection should have one of each. I agree with the sharp edges on the trigger. I am not sure why they haven’t addressed that yet, it’s easy enough to do.

 

[Marshal Tom]

Very nice looking. Look at the Wilson Combat replacement sight for the new Python. I have seen reviews and it seems to be a very good upgrade.

 

[.357magger]

Congratulations on your new "Snake".

I think you'll continue to be pleased.

I chose the 3" version a couple of months back, and after some grip alterations I've been pleased as well. I've only put 100 rounds through mine to date, 50 q25 grain 38+Ps and 50 125 grain 357s. I haven't had any issues with wandering rear, or any issues at all. It's a very accurate revolver, but it does get edged out slightly by my tuned S&W 66 no dash. But then again that one has a tuned action and I have LOTS of trigger time with it.

I'm very pleased with Colt's new offering.

Thanks for sharing yours and your experience to date.

(here's a quick peek of mine. I've posted these pics before, sorry, but they're the only ones I've taken so far. )

 

[Stephanie B]

Very nice looking. Look at the Wilson Combat replacement sight for the new Python. I have seen reviews and it seems to be a very good upgrade.

It is indeed well worth it.

 

[CH4]

It is indeed well worth it.

Do you happen to know if the Harrison front sights are the same height as the Wilson’s?

 

[sophie]

Finally pulled the trigger on a new Python in the 4.25 inch barrel. The finish on the gun is beautiful and appears to be flawlessly executed. I ran about 100 rounds through it, mostly 38s but a few cylinders’ worth of 158 grain .357s also. Pleased to report the sights came out of the box dead center on, we’ll see how long that lasts with the now infamous loosey-goosey rear sight.
I was disappointed to note that the edges of the trigger are uncomfortably sharp. So much so, I’m thinking of maybe trying some Talon Grip tape on it to try to remedy.

Overall, very happy with the purchase, with minor deductions for the rear sight (no surprise) and the sharp edges on the trigger.

I have 2 new Colt Pythons. One is a 4.25” and a 6” also. I’ve shot about 75 rounds through the 4.25” and don’t like the sharp edges on the trigger. I never thought about the Talon Grip Tape on the trigger. I keep the Talon Rubber Material on hand all the time. I may try it. I don’t like the Python grips and am looking to change them. I have installed the Wilson Combat Sights on both guns and they have no movement like the original sights. They are a great improvement over the original sights.

 

[sophie]

Do you happen to know if the Harrison front sights are the same height as the Wilson’s?

I talked to Harrison about his Python (Snake) sights, which are quite impressive. If I remember correctly Harrison gives front sight height on the fiber optic and the gold bead also. The rear sight blade is just that, only a blade, and does nothing to take the movement out of the rear sight itself. Wilson Combat doesn’t mention front sight height that I seen. Enclosed are a couple of the pictures of my 4.25” Python with the Wilson Combat Sights and I chose the Green Fiber Optic for the front sight. I see the green better. Hopefully the OP doesn’t think I’m hijacking his post. It’s not my intention. This is all related to the new Colt Python. The Wilson Combat Sights took very little adjustment when shooting the first time after installation.

 

[CH4]

Thanks, Sophie

 

[CajunBass]

Congratulations to the OP. They are nice guns, aren't they? I've got two of them, both with 4.25 barrel. Well, one is mine and the other is my wife's.

I just got mine out of the safe, and packed it, and a box of wadcutters for a trip to the range this morning.

 

[Thuer]

At my vistit at the Coltstand in Nurnberg IWA. The Colt employee told me that the new Python is better then the old one. Hmmmmm. i have one made in 1961. Really???

 

[KalamazooKid]

I think you’re gonna love it! I have some old ones which I love to shoot and now a 3” new model also. I did add a Wilson Combat rear sight to mine which is a big improvement IMHO.

 

[boykinlp]

I think you’re gonna love it! I have some old ones which I love to shoot and now a 3” new model also. I did add a Wilson Combat rear sight to mine which is a big improvement IMHO.

Wow, you failed to mention those spectacular stag grips! If the other side matches the visible side, they are some of the best I have seen. Absolutely love the “popcorn”! Any idea who made them?
Larry

 

[KalamazooKid]

Wow, you failed to mention those spectacular stag grips! If the other side matches the visible side, they are some of the best I have seen. Absolutely love the “popcorn”! Any idea who made them?
Larry

As with many of these older Sambar stag grips they are unmarked. The fit and feel complement the looks just right. [emoji41]

The other side is equally beautiful.

 

[CH4]

At my vistit at the Coltstand in Nurnberg IWA. The Colt employee told me that the new Python is better then the old one. Hmmmmm. i have one made in 1961. Really???

Cool!
I also have one from 1961, a 4”. I can’t remember the entire serial number, but I believe the first three digits are: 13,3XX.

 

[Mike SC Hunter]

Very nice looking. Look at the Wilson Combat replacement sight for the new Python. I have seen reviews and it seems to be a very good upgrade.

Yes. But sad to have spend over $200.00 for decent rear sight on a new $1500.00 revolver........My old Python with it's micro sight still works well after 43 years. When they get the rear sight right. I'll start a hunt for a 3 in..

 

[.38SuperMan]

I took my 3” to the range Friday and shot a box of home loads. I have all three and can’t decide which I like best. I owned a late70’s 6” for years and foolishly sold it when prices went through the roof and when colt introduced the new ones I had to buy one. Fortunately I have a fantastic wife and was encouraged to get all 3.

 

[stansdds]

At my vistit at the Coltstand in Nurnberg IWA. The Colt employee told me that the new Python is better then the old one. Hmmmmm. i have one made in 1961. Really???

The new lock work is superior in terms of durability. The issue with the older Pythons was rapid double action shooting would wear the hand and then the hand could not fully rotate the cylinder into lock up. The new lock work addresses this issue.

 

[swagmeister]

I have had several older Pythons over 50+years of trading and collecting and all were fine weapons. I could never get used to the stacking in the double action pull when compared to a Smith and Wesson so they all eventually went down the road for something else; the single action pulls were fantastic! The new Python is supposed to have a better double action pull with the stacking gone. At my age and fixed income, I probably will never own a new one but I am not complaining because I still have my 686 Mountain Gun and it's going nowhere. Enjoy your new Python in good health.

 

[KalamazooKid]

Yes. But sad to have spend over $200.00 for decent rear sight on a new $1500.00 revolver........My old Python with it's micro sight still works well after 43 years. When they get the rear sight right. I'll start a hunt for a 3 in..

Fair enough but I paid $110 + s/h.