No Lock 442

TNZ71

Member
Joined
May 17, 2016
Messages
830
Reaction score
2,375
City & State/Province
In transit
When I got the email about a "sale" I resisted. I watched as the inventory on hand dropped to 1. Weakness overtook me. I hit the buy button on a no-lock 442. $339 plus free shipping. I really didn't need another carry piece.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0563.jpg
    IMG_0563.jpg
    75.7 KB
When I got the email about a "sale" I resisted. I watched as the inventory on hand dropped to 1. Weakness overtook me. I hit the buy button on a no-lock 442. $339 plus free shipping. I really didn't need another carry piece.

Good price and a great light weight carry piece. You can't go wrong with that.
 
Good price and a great light weight carry piece. You can't go wrong with that.

The price was the bait, being a no-lock was the hook. I think that it was a few dollars cheaper than my used 642 cost me and it has the lock.
 
I really didn't need another carry piece.

Yes, you did. :) Can never have enough carry pieces. Wear/repair, placed into evidence (please not this!), the list goes on.

I remember an old gun magazine article directed at merchants listing the 4 reasons for retail purchases. "NEED" was at the very bottom of the list.

Enjoy that wonderful gun.

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
 
That's a great looking revolver for that price! From the photo, it looks like it doesn't have a blast shield installed. I thought I saw that, as a general rule of thumb, the blued Airweight's used scandium and also a blast shield as a result. My 360J, which I paid more for, used, :( than yours, has the shield.
 
That's a great looking revolver for that price! From the photo, it looks like it doesn't have a blast shield installed. I thought I saw that, as a general rule of thumb, the blued Airweight's used scandium and also a blast shield as a result. My 360J, which I paid more for, used, :( than yours, has the shield.

The standard 442 is not a Scandium design and does not have the blast shield ("With the blast shield down, I can't even see!"). My 340 M&Ps are Scandium-framed and have the shield.

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
 
Hopefully TNZ71 won't yell at me for going off-topic! My 360J is the first alu revolver for me in many years. Is the whole blast-shield concept a big deal as far as longevity of the revolver? A tiny bit more off-topic - I've noticed that the rear cyl locking pin is digging quite a gouge into my 360 - noticeably more than my more-used Ruger LCR ... :(

Added: looked at the LCR again, in fact, there is no gouge on the LCR recoil shield. One small right spot can be seen. Looks like (speculation here) Ruger uses a different/harder coating/anodizing on the LCR.
 
Last edited:
Congrats the fresh acquisition! The 442 was my first CCW gun. I've since bought an M&P 340 but, I can say it certainly isn't twice the gun compared to a 442 (even though S&W like to charge for like it is). Great price on that 442 and it will last you a life time.
 
A day without a 442 is like a day without sunshine
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0496.JPG
    IMG_0496.JPG
    123.9 KB
Congratulations on getting a great gun at a great price! I'm thinking of buying a used 642 that I've seen listed at a gun store for $295, so I like the way you think!
 
When I got the email about a "sale" I resisted. I watched as the inventory on hand dropped to 1. Weakness overtook me. I hit the buy button on a no-lock 442. $339 plus free shipping. I really didn't need another carry piece.
Oh yes you did! :D
The price was the bait, being a no-lock was the hook.
Which is exactly why there is one on my 2017 target acquisitions list. :) For now, my preferred local shop can't quite hit that price point but he is still searching and trying. Yes, I could just have him transfer one in and give him the transfer fee alone... but I can wait. :cool:

Only sad part is that I could have had a "like-new" used one for a song (and I do mean really, really a song). Just another one that got away because I momentarily hesitated. :rolleyes:
 
Nice! I have never seen a 442 for sale at a gun shop in my area and I don't know why. You would think the black finish would be equally if not more popular then the silver finish.
 
That's a good price. When I bought my 642-1 new six years ago I paid right around $400 shipped.

Yes, you did. :) Can never have enough carry pieces. Wear/repair, placed into evidence (please not this!), the list goes on.

Agreed. I had one 642, until it broke about a year-and-a-half ago. S&W replaced it under warranty, but I was without a gun for a couple of months. I now have a second 642 (a no-dash) as a back-up.
 
The standard 442 is not a Scandium design and does not have the blast shield ("With the blast shield down, I can't even see!"). My 340 M&Ps are Scandium-framed and have the shield.

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103

cb017806ace9e294c2b775fcee7b85e5.jpg
 
About 18 months ago, I went into the LGS/range to be greeted by a sign reading "Smith & Wesson Factory Sale" with an arrow pointing at one of the classrooms. Lotsa S&Ws at pretty good prices with the 442s and 438s being marked $399.95. In between them, the 642-2s were marked $329.95, and the factory guys were saying how Eric had mis-marked them. Well, Eric wouldn't come down off the prices for the 442s or 438s, so I bought a 642-2. There was a $100.00 off store coupon in the box, so I got my 642-2 for $229.95 ($249.54 OTD!).

Yeah, I'm that guy.
 
Like the sw442 no lock, so does my family . They took my last 3 .I am on four now. They go bang when you pull the trigger.
 
Mine just falls in my jacket pocket every day. A perfect fit. I paid $355 a couple years back for my new no lock 442. You did very well. Enjoy!
 
I'm fairly new to the revolver game and had been holding out for a 640 as my next revolver, but this past Monday I came across a deal on a no lock 442 for $300. Guy bought it and it went right in his safe. Never carried or fired other than the test round at S&W. So this sounded like too good of a deal to pass up. Needless to say she's not a virgin anymore.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top