Now for something completely different

imjin138

US Veteran
Joined
Mar 28, 2004
Messages
1,272
Reaction score
195
Location
Racine Wi. USA
I just read an article that 69 year old Paul Micheal Glaser was arrested in Kentucky for smoking pot. I recall from a post earlier that wearing a shoulder holster might make you look like a Starsky and Hutch wanna be.

He claims that it was medicinal marijuana from California.
 
Register to hide this ad
Like Tony Beretta used to say, "Don't do the Crime if you can't do the Time..." :)

Bet he didn't have a 'script for that dope, and I wonder if Kentucky will honor his Mary-Jane Card....
 
Like Tony Beretta used to say, "Don't do the Crime if you can't do the Time..." :)

Bet he didn't have a 'script for that dope, and I wonder if Kentucky will honor his Mary-Jane Card....

Short answer - "No"
 
Kentucky has a reputation of being tough in marijuana possession cases, but I guess that may depend to some extent upon the jurisdiction.
 
Kentucky has a reputation of being tough in marijuana possession cases, but I guess that may depend to some extent upon the jurisdiction.


More enlightened states have decriminalized marijuana. Here, possession of am ounce or less is a petty misdomeaner, and you get a fine like a traffic ticket. No court, no prison.

Why waste the taxpayers money prosecuting the casual MJ user. It's just foolish.

Go after the crack houses, and the meth labs. They do REAL damage to society.
 
If you travel and carry concealed you are wise to check the laws in the state(s) you are in. I guess the same applies to pot. If you're packin' or puffin' check the local laws. :eek:
 
Calling All Social Progressives....

More enlightened states have decriminalized marijuana. Here, possession of am ounce or less is a petty misdomeaner, and you get a fine like a traffic ticket. No court, no prison.

Why waste the taxpayers money prosecuting the casual MJ user. It's just foolish.

Go after the crack houses, and the meth labs. They do REAL damage to society.

More Enlightened? More Corrupted is more like it.

I guess that's the reason they call it "dope".

The very next election cycle after the legalization of MJ you'll be back her stumping for liberalization of hash, right?

What's next after that?

It's the compromise of the law and the moral standards that support it that does the "REAL Damage".
 
More Enlightened? More Corrupted is more like it.

I guess that's the reason they call it "dope".

The very next election cycle after the legalization of MJ you'll be back her stumping for liberalization of hash, right?

What's next after that?

It's the compromise of the law and the moral standards that support it that does the "REAL Damage".

Yep, just wait until they legalize ALCOHOL and TOBACCO;):D

I figured Kentucky would be more liberal. The stuff grows wild on the sides of the roads. Not the "quality" of the good stuff, guess it's left over from the hemp industry.
 
More Enlightened? More Corrupted is more like it.

I guess that's the reason they call it "dope".

The very next election cycle after the legalization of MJ you'll be back her stumping for liberalization of hash, right?

What's next after that?

It's the compromise of the law and the moral standards that support it that does the "REAL Damage".

Those who write the dictionaries get to define the words. Same with laws. Those who write them get to decide what is/isn't "legal."

So a dwindling few can actually remember when alcohol was legal... then suddenly... it was not legal. Then, when the fed. govt. needed money (excise tax), it was again... legal. And during that time millions of dollars were spent trying to stop people from drinking alcohol. God only knows how many people's lives were destroyed. And... at least a few made tremendous amounts of money by which they later obtained political power with at least one son becoming president.

The reason fewer and fewer people have any respect for laws prohibiting marijuana is that beyond emotional hype, it is seen as no different than another generations demon rum with exactly the same political and financial interest driving the debate.

The general disregard for such laws reflects the simple fact that the laws themselves are seen as being without any legitimate merit. Further, these laws are seen by many as being contrary to the best interest of the public. This is true of those who advocate the use of marijuana, exactly as was once true for those who advocated for the legal use of alcohol. This is true of many who do not and have not ever used marijuana, exactly as was once true of many who advocated for the legal use of alcohol.
 
Yep, just wait until they legalize ALCOHOL and TOBACCO;):D

I figured Kentucky would be more liberal. The stuff grows wild on the sides of the roads. Not the "quality" of the good stuff, guess it's left over from the hemp industry.

at one time,ky was 2nd to califorina in amount of pot grown and sold in the usa,was considered some of the best pot in the usa,also had a hash making operation,(back int the late 60's early 70's), that made the best hash going and made any kind you wanted lebonese blond,german black tar whatever you needed,and dont ask how i know,we now have a bill introduced to legalize medical marijuana in ky
 
I have never smoked it myself, however I know people that have and I know a lot of people that are locked up for selling it and usung it. Mostly they sell it to make money to buy other drugs and they sell it to people younger than themselves.

After spending 21 years working in prisons and watching the same people being released and coming back for drug use/sale and that is after they graduate from intensive in house drug programs and relapse prevention programs it is disheartening.

My younger siblings started out at 13 or 14 smoking pot and my brother died at 30 from drug use after spending the majority of his life behind bars for drugs and theft he stole to pay for his habit. My younger sister had a child at 16 that was deaf, dumb and blind and pretty much a vegetable from her use of drugs and was finally busted selling drugs to others to pay for her habit.

Should they legalize no, should they put people in prison for it thats up for debate. Since they commit other crimes related to their drug use it is usually an add on charge in Wisconsin.
 
For those libertarians who believe that marijuana should be legalized, along with other drugs, consider this:

Being a libertarian requires personal responsibility in all phases of life. If one chooses to use marijuana, heroin, cocaine, meth, crack, etc., that's all right. However, if one chooses that route, then one can't expect society to pick up the dregs and foot the bill for medical care, rehabilitation, etc. One doesn't get it both ways.

Living in society is a series of compromises of personal freedom and liberty. One goes along to get along. If the mores of society call for keeping certain drugs illegal, then so be it.

The alcohol and Prohibition are another argument entirely. People have imbibed alcoholic beverages for thousands of years, and the vast majority have done so without becoming alcoholics. Thousands of times daily, people have the one or two drinks socially, with a meal, etc., without ill effects. Prohibition was social engineering of the worst sort. Alcoholism and excessive drinking was a problem to the Women's Christian Temperance Union, among others, and no one else. The ensuing amendment to the U.S. Constitiution was bad governance and societal over-reaching at its worst.
 
Personally speaking, I've got no problem with someone using marijuana for legitimate medical reasons (glaucoma, etc.) in the privacy of their own home. My concern is getting T-boned on the road by some stoner who gets behind the wheel in an altered state.
 
We all have heard both sides to the argument countless times. Most probley are valid arguments taken by it`s self. My observation has been one thing leads to another and you can group types together. It`s profileing, but is right far more than wrong. You wont often see a fundalmentest preacher that is into dope or booze, and I doubt a heavy metal fan with a red mohawk and tatts with a cork in his ear lobe will turn down a reefer. I doubt if a meth head would either. I will also bet a heroin addict didnt start out on heroin without first starting with MJ
.
 
Back
Top