NRA Responds To New York Trial Verdict

Register to hide this ad
I hope they can clean up and rise back to what they used to be.

ANY organization can suffer the incompetence or corruption of bad leadership. I don't want the NRA to be one of them going forward. They're an American staple in the gun rights world. Here's to hoping!
 
Gee, imagine that.

The NRA saw that it might have some internal issues - and started taking actions to correct them - long BEFORE the anti-gun prosecutors ever brought charges, and BEFORE the MSM started trying to use these "issues" to undermine public opinion of the organization.

Who'd a thunk it?!? That the whole thing was a witch-hunt against a pro-2nd Amendment organization?

I'm SHOCKED I tell you, absolutely SHOCKED! [/sarcasm]
 
Last edited:
I remain positive and hopeful for the NRA and their future going forward. They are a large and powerful organization fighting one of the toughest battles in America. Difficulties have occurred in the past and will likely occur again.
If you're old enough, you may remember some of the challenges they've overcome years ago. Neal Knox, for example, was a controversial figure who transformed the organization. And, that's not to mention the whole NRA vs GOA rivalry that occasionally comes up. (Both are good organizations!)

We need them now as much, if not more, than ever!
 
Gee, imagine that.

The NRA saw that it might have some internal issues - and started taking actions to correct them - long BEFORE the anti-gun prosecutors ever brought charges, and BEFORE the MSM started trying to use these "issues" to undermine public opinion of the organization.

Who'd a thunk it?!? That the whole thing was a witch-hunt against a pro-2nd Amendment organization?

Below is an opinion link with more validation that the NRA was pursued by the NY AG as a campaign promise, the NRA came out ahead in the lawsuit, and BIG positive things are coming to the NRA. The Main Stream Media is trying its best to make the NRA irrelevant and corrupt. This was a trial in NY by a liberal Manhattan Jury, an activist AG and now so many members have been on here condemning the leadership of the NRA after reading and now following the liberal press. Research deeper about what happened other than people trying to run a Board Position campaign on here. Leadership at the NRA started in 2017 planning for this AG attack, and doing all it could to correct wrongs and strategically plan to make the NRA solid through the attack, but it was an attack by the NY AG!

The liberals and the anti-gunners are trying their best to fracture us! There have always been politicians spreading half-truths trying to get the low information voters to follow them. Get information from other sources than this main stream media and people trying to take advantage of negative media blasts.

Here is another article that supports the facts other than those being pushed by the liberal propaganda media:

The NRA Strikes Back | The New York Sun

To fully view the article, the site will ask for your email address.
 
La Perrier is gone but the filth that let that happen is still there.

I think he is still a paid "consultant"

EDIT- he is not. That is cleared up in post #19 here.
 
Last edited:
I think he is still a paid "consultant"

I have seen that rumor on here and don't have any validation of it except in the gossip of folks upset with WLP and/or the NRA. If it is true, could there be a business reason for it? The NRA is a billion dollar corporation and having a clean separation with no strings at that level are something that would have to be enormous. I think the truth to that rumor will either be confirmed or put in the hogwash category.
 
Has anyone actually seen ANY evidence that WLP will be kept on payroll as a paid consultant?
Pretty sure that would not be advised, legally or public relations wise. No.

I have supported the NRA and will continue to support the NRA as the largest pro 2A organization. As many of us have, I continued to vote for change that never came.
At the same time I am a member of and have increased my support for GOA, SAF & ISRA (state group).

I want the NRA to succeed! My continued support for the NRA is not unconditional however. They need to get back to a mission first philosophy and lean out wasteful spending.
 
I hope that this is the right place to throw in my $.02.

Wayne and some of his cronies hi-jacked the NRA and drained a certain amount of money from it. The membership was the injured party, but the state of NY did not act to remedy the wrong to the membership, but instead attacked the NRA through Wayne LaPierre.

Embezzlement or misappropriation aside, Wayne LaPierre did a good job of representing gun owners. That is exactly why he was a target of the state of NY.

The state of NY is completely wrong, and furthermore dishonest, in its attack on the NRA, which it pretends is a defense of the membership. Every careful and honest observer can see this.

The NRA has problems which allowed this to happen. They should be fixed.

Wayne LaPierre is not the devil. He has done good things and bad things, and should not be running the NRA.

Looking forward to improvement.
 
Why did it take a NYC antigun far left Democrat to do what NRA members and executives should have done years ago? If not for that, it would still be business as usual.

A thieves and a dishonest men with no morals are going to show you who they are and are going to be who they are. I blame them as much as I blame our side for complacency and knowingly, allowing it to happen right in front of our faces. Those who allowed it to continue are just as guilty, IMHO.

We should be embarrassed that the enemy had to clean house for us. Everyone who was there and did nothing shot be expelled and everyone who voted to keep the crooks in power should lose their right to vote going forward if I had my way.
 
Last edited:
Below is an opinion link with more validation that the NRA was pursued by the NY AG as a campaign promise, the NRA came out ahead in the lawsuit, and BIG positive things are coming to the NRA. The Main Stream Media is trying its best to make the NRA irrelevant and corrupt. This was a trial in NY by a liberal Manhattan Jury, an activist AG and now so many members have been on here condemning the leadership of the NRA after reading and now following the liberal press. Research deeper about what happened other than people trying to run a Board Position campaign on here. Leadership at the NRA started in 2017 planning for this AG attack, and doing all it could to correct wrongs and strategically plan to make the NRA solid through the attack, but it was an attack by the NY AG!

The liberals and the anti-gunners are trying their best to fracture us! There have always been politicians spreading half-truths trying to get the low information voters to follow them. Get information from other sources than this main stream media and people trying to take advantage of negative media blasts.

Here is another article that supports the facts other than those being pushed by the liberal propaganda media:

The NRA Strikes Back | The New York Sun

To fully view the article, the site will ask for your email address.

IMAGINE THAT!

The NY AG, who campaigned on a promise to "take down the NRA", pulled out all the stops, and EVEN overstepped the law to try to make good on her promise.

And a LOT of people on both sides of the issue bought into it, because the MSM propaganda machine saturated the "news" with only HER side of the story.

Looks like she accomplished at least part of her agenda, since she has managed to turn some of the supporters of the 2nd-Amendment against the NRA - as we have so clearly seen during this persecution - er, I mean prosecution - of the NY lawsuit over the last couple of years...

Like the USA, the NRA isn't perfect, and I would never try to claim either of them are - BUT they are still the best there is, IMO.

Too many people on "our side" seem to have been convinced that we need to throw out the baby with the bathwater...
 
Last edited:
YMMW. I hate thieves even more than I hate liars, and Wayne is both. There was a movement over 20 years ago to replace him but he and his cronies squashed it.

Not only that, but many gun owners and NRA members still made excuses for him, like some are currently doing in this thread. He was a cancer that many allowed to flourish, and now they're attempting to place some if the blame on gun owners and accusing them of being victims of "propaganda" when it wasn't propaganda at all but rather factual truth. What was stated about those running the NRA and issues within the NRA was true. The gun owners who choose not to fund corruption and to vote with their wallets by funding other gun rights organizations instead are the real heroes. Those who turned a blind eye and were more upset with the messenger (MSNBC) and the victims (NRA members and gun owners) are the real problem. If everyone gave to a different organization until the cancer and con artists were gone, we wouldn't be discussing this right now. The NRA would have been better and stronger in the long run.

As long as some of us believe the ends justify the means and will directly or indirectly support wrong, there will always be conflict with other gun owners who refuse to put up with it.
 
Last edited:
I also disagree that most gun owners believed the liberal media's reporting. From my personal experience and from what I saw when it was first reported, there was a lot of skepticism because of who was bringing the charges and because the information was coming from biased sources (mainstream media). It wasn't until facts and details were released that everyone started to be outraged. We aren't that simple minded, and we know better than to blindly believe what the news media puts out relating to anything political or having to do with social causes.
 
Last edited:
Okay, this one's going to take a minute...

I think you all know that I am a candidate running for a seat on the NRA Board, and that I am highly critical of the current "leadership." You also might know that I'm a regular columnist for Firearms News and Ammoland.com.

I wish Blaine Wade had offered a similar disclosure at the opening of his post, as Mr. Wade is a current member of the NRA Board of Directors. He's been on the Board since about 2016.

The statement from the NRA is an outrageous distortion of the facts.
Let's start with the opening line:

"A jury verdict in a high-profile New York trial confirms what the National Rifle Association of America (NRA) contended all along – that it was victimized by certain former vendors and "insiders" who abused the trust placed in them by the Association."

A full year before Letitia James filed her suit against the NRA, I opined in an Ammoland column that the NRA Board had two choices:

1. They could remove the miscreants and fix the problems, admitting any wrongdoing, and facing whatever uncomfortable music might come along with that admission, or

2. They could circle the wagons around Wayne LaPierre and keep circling right down the toilet.

The Board, including Mr. Wade, chose option 2.

Apparently, in NRA-speak, "all along" means since last month when Wayne resigned "for health reasons," because that's when they first admitted that "insiders" (besides Josh Powell, Wayne's hand-picked deputy who was briefly assumed to be his successor, who was tossed under the bus early on) had anything to do with their problems, and it's very significant that they did not mention LaPierre by name in this statement, even though he was the key "insider" at the heart of all of the problems.

Had the Board chosen option 1. above, sending LaPierre on his way with honor and a nice bonus (in spite of some grumbling from some NRA members for that part), then rooting out other improprieties and cleaning house, they could have avoided the NY AG's suit entirely. Instead they spent well over $100 million on lawyers and legal maneuvering, including over $13 million on a sham bankruptcy (which conveniently opened their books for the world to see), losing well over a million members, and watching annual revenues decline from almost $400 million, down to around $200 million, reelecting LaPierre 5 times, and consistently declaring that the AG's investigation and eventual suit were nothing but "politically-motivated BS," "witch hunts," "wholly without substance..." I guess that's what they meant by "all along."

Something else I've said repeatedly since this all started, is that there's no question that Letitia James hates the NRA and wants to destroy it, and that her investigation into the NRA and eventual suit were absolutely politically-motivated to a large degree. AND the investigation and suit were unfortunately not baseless, as the evidence kept growing that showed that LaPierre, former Treasurer Woody Phillips, Josh Powell, several members of the Board of Directors, a number of other current and former employees, and a number of vendors that were close to LaPierre, were padding their own pockets to the tune of millions to tens of millions of dollars a year at NRA member expense.

Reading Mr. Wade's comments here really raised my blood pressure, and I could go on for pages and pages explaining the facts and pointing out the fallacies and distortions in his comments and the links he shared, including the effort to cloud the issue by conflating two very different lawsuits, but I won't do that to you.

If you are interested, you can go to my website or Ammoland.com and do a search on "NRA." It will return years worth of articles by me and others, discussing the case and looking at the evidence. You'll see that long before this case got to trial, and after LaPierre's stories had gone through multiple revisions and variations, LaPierre had admitted to virtually all of the charges that had been made against him. Still members of the Board like Mr. Wade kept insisting that it was all BS and that people like me who were reporting on the mess were either misguided, being sucked in by "liberal media lies," or were actively trying to sabotage the NRA.

I take significant personal offense to all of those suggestions.

By the way, this was just the first of two trials scheduled in this case. The second trial is scheduled to begin in mid-July. In it, the judge will hear arguments and decide what remedies he will apply to get the NRA back on track and serving the members. My personal hope is that he will remove most, if not all of the current Board for their complicity in this fiasco, and appoint a Members Committee -- ideally chosen from candidates suggested by the various State Associations -- to oversee a total reorganization of the Association, including a reduction of the Board of Directors down from the current 76 members, to something more reasonable like 9 to 15 qualified, working members.

I'll also add that LaPierre did not receive any golden parachute, and he and the NRA stated in open court that he would not be employed or paid anything by the NRA in the future. It's troubling that Mr. Wade didn't know this.

Finally, on the subject of, "We fixed everything back in 2018 and everything's super above-board and beyond reproach now..."
It just came out that Tyler Schropp, the head of Development at NRA (one of LaPierre's closest pals and one of NRA's highest paid employees) has promoted Wayne's niece -- in Omaha -- to a $300k per year department head position in his division of NRA. (Nothing to see here... Everything's fine... Move along...)
 
I'll also add that LaPierre did not receive any golden parachute

Really? No contact buy out? No sweet "retirement deal"? Saying something in court isn't a binding deal. IANAL but I'm pretty sure that I could proclaim in court that I will never eat another cheeseburger and could stop at McD's without penalty UNLESS the judge follows that with a court order barring me from eating cheeseburgers.

From "The Guardian"

The filing also indicates LaPierre will be paid at least $1m a year after his retirement. The condition is referenced in a post-employment contract that was neither reviewed nor approved by the group's board or any other committee, or disclosed to membership, the complaint says.
 
Back
Top