Voting in the NRA Election < Spread The Word!!

I'd like to see the 4 candidates elected.
Truth be known, the boards goal is to perpetuate themselves and keep on doing what they're doing. Self preservation.
I'm not sure 4 new members can be heard on a board of 70.
The key fact is, and I've said it a million times: The board needs to be cut to 13 members, all freely elected with no input from a nominating committee made up of the 70 other board members.
There needs to be groundswell to make that change.
 
VotingApril 28 deadline

Ballots have been delivered for the 2024 NRA Board of Directors Election.

You can vote for up to 25 candidates, but you don't have to vote for all 25.
Again, the best way to ensure that true reform candidates get elected is to vote for only four -- Marshall, Journey, Fusaro, and Knox --
then mail the ballot in well before the April 28 deadline.

Snipped the original to emphasis the date

Bekeart
 
My sincere and heartfelt thanks to you, Jeff, and also to Philip Journey, Dennis Fusaro and Rocky Marshall. I am so glad that the four of you, along with some of the NRA's existing BOD members and some of us NRA members can see the value the NRA holds for us in protecting our 2A rights not to mention the many programs the NRA has for the shooting sports. I have voted in every NRA BOD election since I became eligible and it seems that FINALLY maybe our votes will mean something. Thank you again!
 
It's Not About Giving Money

Vote YES on the bylaw.

Firearms Policy Coalition
Firearmspolicy.org
Give money to the NRA if you want, but these guys are the ones who win court battles all over the country on a regular basis.

FPC has done some good work in recent years. Supporting their efforts is definitely worthwhile, but this thread isn't about where to send your money, it's about the limited opportunity we have over the next year or so to get the most powerful organization we've ever had back up and moving in the right direction.

It should be noted that much of FPC's success has been predicated on NRA's efforts, particularly the Bruen decision, which the NRA funded and sponsored, but also the decades of NRA-sponsored and supported academic research and writing that laid the groundwork for Heller and McDonald. SAF, Goa Foundation, and other organizations have also had some significant success in the courts.

None of the other organizations can come close to doing what the NRA has been doing for 170 years though -- building a culture around shooting, hunting, and collecting, protecting hunting rights, land access, and teaching hunter safety, building ranges, competitions, and a national network of state associations and affiliated clubs. The NRA has some major blunders on their record, but those blunders are small compared to the total contribution the Association has made toward keeping our rights and our culture alive and vibrant for over a century and a half.

At its peak, just 7 years ago, the NRA had over 5 million members and was generating annual revenue of almost $400 million. [Edit: I erroneously said "Billion" here originally. Fixed it to read "million."]
Compare that to other national groups, which cumulatively have a quarter as many members (with many, if not most of those also being NRA members) and a tenth of the funding -- combined.

Over the next few months, a judge is going to decide what needs fixing within the NRA and how that fixing should be conducted. Our objective is to be sure that judge hears from dedicated NRA members and applies conservation and restoration techniques that will set the Association back on a path of productivity and effectiveness -- in the courts, federal and state legislatures, in training and education, collecting and historical preservation, hunting, competitions, and more.

That's what this thread, and our campaign, is about.
 
Last edited:
I’d love to see an organization chart for the NRA — top-to-bottom. The chart shows how the store is being run. I’ll bet it would produce a lot of good ideas on the “fix” and give the members something tangible to vote on.
 
I count that the president has 29 direct reports. That’s almost as bad as having 70 Directors. In my experience as a corporate VP, 7-9 direct reports is almost manageable. No wonder things are out of control. A major restructuring is absolutely necessary.
 
Back
Top