old model 27 vs new version of 27

[kidneystones]

i need advice on a revolver purchase. there is a used model 27-2 with a 6 inch barrel th, tt, in 95% condition that is available at a local store, no box or case, that was made in the 1970's. compared with my modern 686-6, the double action trigger was superior by a wide margin. while doing some research, i noticed that the 27 are again available from smith in the form of their classic series. these new ones are listed at ~$900, so should retail close to $700. the old 27-2 is priced at about $450. i don't absolutely need to have it, but would hate to pass up on a chance to own a nice gun. any input appreciated.

 

[WyoStillhunter]

I would definitly buy the older 27-2 at that price.

 

[rbmac52]

I'm sure the new Model 27 is a nice gun, but get the older model while you can, as they aren't often available at that kind of price. Besides, the older gun is likely to be better in many ways, including resale value, providing it is in the condition you describe.

 

[Maximumbob54]

If you didn't buy it when you saw it, it may already be gone. That has been my experience with the last four older models I went back for after a few days of thought. I try and just put them on lay away on the spot if I can't pay for them in cash right then and there.

 

[18DAI]

I'd get the 27-2.....while I still could get one.

New one? Resembles a 27.....a little......I guess. Regards 18DAI.

 

[Dave T]

A 27-2 for under $500 is a bargan anywhere I have shopped/looked for guns. I would pay that and more for a clean 27-2 over one of the IL/MIM "classics" currently being sold.

Dave

 

[kidneystones]

thanks for the info. i'll run over and get it then over lunch. the trigger is the thing that i can't get of my mind. the extra top-strap checkering was darn good too.

i'll post pictures when i can.

 

[redbos]

For that money, grab the 27-2 and run. Thats a price that could never hurt you. if you didnt like it, you wuld not lose at $450, in my opinion......

 

[Fishslayer]

I would definitly buy the older 27-2 at that price.

Me too. Lots of people like the Classic models but the real deal? No lock at half the price? No brainer for me.

Why are you reading this? Go get the 27-2 now! At $450 it ain't gonna be there long.

 

[goldenbb]

Any Smith with an external hammer that has the firing pin anyplace besides the hammer is one I don't want.

 

[357 shooter]

I hope it was still there for you! A 95% 27-2 for that price is called a steal to me. I paid that much for a 8 3/8" non-pinned or recessed 27-3 last year and was glad to get it at that price.

 

[stevieboy]

The "Classic" 27 has received excellent reviews and it is, apparently, a quality made and extremely accurate handgun. I wouldn't mind owning one. But, $450 for a 27-2 in excellent condition is an absolute steal. Buy it!

 

[kidneystones]

thanks for all the advice. it was waiting for me, along with a shot only once model 48 22 mag, that i promptly put on layaway. now that i told you guys how much i got it, there's little chance i could sell it for more in this forum.

 

[toddimusnimski]

now that i told you guys how much i got it, there's little chance i could sell it for

Oh, I don't think anyone would begrudge you a little profit off of that! Glad everyone gave you good advice. You done reeeal good. Too bad someone carved up the target stocks though...

Todd

 

[Broker50]

You did well at that price, even with the stocks being butchered.

 

[CajunBass]

thanks for all the advice. it was waiting for me, along with a shot only once model 48 22 mag, that i promptly put on layaway. now that i told you guys how much i got it, there's little chance i could sell it for more in this forum.

Congratulations. Glad it was still there for you.

What you paid for something, has nothing at all to do with what you sell it for.

 

[steamloco76]

Excellent purchase. You can't go wrong buying a nice condition original model 27 for less than $550. Sure beats $800 plus for the new one!!


That said-I hope somebody out there is buying the new "Classic" S&W's and shooting them. That way their will be used ones for us to scarf up as shooters! -My 21-4 and 22-4 Thunder Ranch revolvers prove that S&W can still turn out superb quality N frame revolvers with wonderful trigger action. I'm just glad I was able to get both previously owned for about 55% of new cost.

 

[kidneystones]

the previous owner may have had smaller hands like myself. the grips fit just right. will try to find out how it shoots this weekend. thanks again for all the help.

 

[john4970]

Congrats on a great purchase. A 6" blue 27-2 was my first handgun purchase in 1975 and I still have it. Mine was a 1974 vintage and came with service stocks. I installed a set of S&W target stocks, but kept the original ones. It's a great shooter and has never missed a beat. The Model 48s are getting had to find in my neck of the woods, so you have a good find there also. Let us know how well it shoots. Best wishes.

 

[kidneystones]

shot at 25 yards off-hand, using 125 jhp powered by 4 grains of bullseye. the large group is 40 shots, measuring a mediocre 8 inches across. i found my 686 easier to shoot, maybe because it is more nose heavy that the 27.