OC Vs. Non-OC
I once caught considerable flak for an off-the-cuff comment I made regarding OC in a previous thread. Thus, I'll try to be polite and civil.
It might help to refresh our recollection as to just what elements tend to separate the winners from the losers in armed confrontations, in order of importance: Mindset, judgment, tactics, marksmanship, firearm. It's in the third element where advocates of OC are making a potentially fatal error by giving up the element of surprise by advertising the presence of a firearm. As at least one other has said here, once a thug "makes" you, you are relatively easy to defeat.
Regarding OC, you will ultimately do what you feel is best for you but if you study the hundreds of incidents resulting in an officer fatality, marksmanship or caliber is seldom a factor in an officer's death. Post incident analysis consistently shows that the death resulted from omissions in the first three elements.
I once caught considerable flak for an off-the-cuff comment I made regarding OC in a previous thread. Thus, I'll try to be polite and civil.
It might help to refresh our recollection as to just what elements tend to separate the winners from the losers in armed confrontations, in order of importance: Mindset, judgment, tactics, marksmanship, firearm. It's in the third element where advocates of OC are making a potentially fatal error by giving up the element of surprise by advertising the presence of a firearm. As at least one other has said here, once a thug "makes" you, you are relatively easy to defeat.
Regarding OC, you will ultimately do what you feel is best for you but if you study the hundreds of incidents resulting in an officer fatality, marksmanship or caliber is seldom a factor in an officer's death. Post incident analysis consistently shows that the death resulted from omissions in the first three elements.