just jim
Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 472
- Reaction score
- 500
Oregon Considers Universal Background Checks
State by state the big guys are going for gun controls.
State by state the big guys are going for gun controls.

This is a perfect example of being sucked in. You've been told all dems are anti-gun and it sounds a lot like you believe this. Do a little research and I don't mean fox or newsmax. Try googling Oregon pro gun and see what you can find.Don't know how "pro gun" Oregon can be with a significant Democrat majority in both the house and Senate.
Oregon is also pro gun and growing. Let's be cautious about who is discounted as an ally.
Too often guns are used only to split by political sides. Try not to get sucked in.
CA is another place where pro-gun dems are trying to shake the stereotypes, starting with the dems. (insert high five here).I like where your head's at.
Oregon requires sales checks like a FFL for all sales. No sales to felons, legally banned, etc. I guess I'm OK with checks to enforce laws already on the books.
Oregon does not have registration. They issue carry licenses.
It's a pro-gun state and the NRA is clearly not a valid measuring stick for this.
Don't get sucked in by the NRA or we all lose.
Oregon requires sales checks like a FFL for all sales. No sales to felons, legally banned, etc.
I guess I'm OK with checks to enforce laws already on the books.
.
Bloomberg and his pals want to expand mandatory background checks to "all sales" in Oregon. Your remarks above read like you already believe "all sales" require a background check and are ok with it. Is that what you meant?