Ported 9mm Shield question
- Thread starter kgpcr
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Keeps the barrel down a little but the best addition on the PC model are the sights
IMHO, the ports on a regular 9mm are mostly for show and to meet the current fad. The do reduce the muzzle rise a little, but at the expense of more blast and flash.
The compensators used in competition are much more effective at keeping the muzzle down on the high-pressure, longer barrel USPSA Open pistols.
Definitely try before you buy.
The compensators used in competition are much more effective at keeping the muzzle down on the high-pressure, longer barrel USPSA Open pistols.
Definitely try before you buy.
Last edited:
changemyoil66
Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2017
- Messages
- 41
- Reaction score
- 12
Will a ported barrel need a slide with slots in it?
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Oh yes indeed.
More effective is to get an extended threaded barrel and use a screw-on compensator.
Last edited:
ScaryWoody
Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2012
- Messages
- 605
- Reaction score
- 400
I don't agree with a ported barrel on a self defense gun. Hot gasses could singe, plus added flash. On a target or range gun sure. I wish S&W offered a choice for the PC pistols.
Ranger17
Member
I really like the trigger and sights (FO) on my PC, seems a slight bit less of muzzle flip as well. Yes it has a little flash, had the range officer (dimly lit indoor range) watch me shoot and he shot it as well. Said he had no real concerns about it. Frankly neither do I.
That said, flash can exist and the barrel/slide will definitely get dirtier than a std Shield. All is fine with me as I love shooting my PC. Others may have enough concern to stay with the original model.
And yes if one has questions and can shoot it before buying that is never a bad thing.
That said, flash can exist and the barrel/slide will definitely get dirtier than a std Shield. All is fine with me as I love shooting my PC. Others may have enough concern to stay with the original model.
And yes if one has questions and can shoot it before buying that is never a bad thing.
dagodave1
Member
I just got a PC in 9mm and have had no issues with it. The muzzle blast coming out of the ports at low light in the range don't bother me at all. It shoots great and I carry it...
oneounceload
Member
Ports make you more likely to need serious hearing enhancements when you get older or fire a few shots, whichever comes first..........
BlueArch91
Member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 45
I do not own one but I shot one, the night sight model. It is a very soft shooter. I definitely would buy one but I already have a single stack. Trigger is awesome. Some might even say too range worthy to be carry worthy. The one I shot had almost no take up on the trigger. Sweet gun. I didn't think the port flash was any worse than what I see from the muzzle.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
hexnut
Member
No problems with mine. The flash is hardly noticeable. To get singed not likely, you would have to put your head over the muzzle then the blast goes to the sides. The trigger and sights are great. The people who don't like them probably don't own one. LOL
jejb
Member
We have 4 Shield's, 2-9's and 2-40's. One each of the 9 and 40 are PC's. We don't notice any flash from the porting when we shoot the guns, and the porting helps a little bit with the time to get back on target, but I would not call the difference huge there.
The bigger pluses of the PC version, at least to me, are the trigger and the fiber optic sights. We both really notice the trigger when going from the non-PC to the PC versions. Less creep and more crisp.
They all shoot well, but I think the PC version is for sure worth the extra money.
The bigger pluses of the PC version, at least to me, are the trigger and the fiber optic sights. We both really notice the trigger when going from the non-PC to the PC versions. Less creep and more crisp.
They all shoot well, but I think the PC version is for sure worth the extra money.
I haven't found any of this to be true, I own one, and have put several hundred rounds through it, after dark, held up close against my body, etc.
I wish people would only comment on ported Shields if they actually own one, if you have one, you'd be singing a different tune. Nobody here that has a PC model has anything bad to say about them. They do have a much better trigger than other Shields.
S&W does offer a choice, if you don't like ports, just get a regular (non ported ) Shield.
The ports really do help controllabillity, and getting back on target faster. My PC .40 is almost as pleasant to shoot as my daughter's 9mm.
A 9mm in a PC gun would be nice indeed, the quickest of the Shield's to get back on target, and the most pleasant for extended shooting sessions.
GrayGhost99
Member
A plus for the night sight model is that it come with 3 magazines instead of 2. And don't forget the current smith rebate that gives you 2 more mags and some ammo
I have one of the Performance center ported 9's.
I shoot at an enclosed, dimly lit range. The flash is no worse than any other gun I shoot, and that's a somewhat embarrassing number.
Does the porting do a lot? Meh, not really that I notice.
Is it an issue if the gun is fired from a very close distance to the body?
Potentially yes, derbies from the ports could be projected into the eyes for example. Anything is arguable. For that matter the same argument can be made if a J-frame revolver is fired too close to the body.
I bought it because of the enhanced trigger which provides a superior trigger pull in my opinion.
What I had planned to do was buy the gun, then pick up a non-ported barrel for it to use as a CCW gun.
Fact is, I don't need to - the ported shield is just fine for carry as it is.
I shoot at an enclosed, dimly lit range. The flash is no worse than any other gun I shoot, and that's a somewhat embarrassing number.
Does the porting do a lot? Meh, not really that I notice.
Is it an issue if the gun is fired from a very close distance to the body?
Potentially yes, derbies from the ports could be projected into the eyes for example. Anything is arguable. For that matter the same argument can be made if a J-frame revolver is fired too close to the body.
I bought it because of the enhanced trigger which provides a superior trigger pull in my opinion.
What I had planned to do was buy the gun, then pick up a non-ported barrel for it to use as a CCW gun.
Fact is, I don't need to - the ported shield is just fine for carry as it is.
muzzleblasted
Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2013
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 9
Love my PC 9mm....great little gun.
I have both versions of the Shield which I have shot extensively. I have never been blinded or powder burned because of the porting. Maybe it could happen on other guns, but on the PC Shield it hasn't been an issue. Just an urban legend I think. I know one could buy the standard Shield and then upgrade the trigger and sights, but just get the PC model and be done with it. For the little extra money you get the better trigger, better sights, and maybe a little less muzzle flip.
Ranger17
Member
I'd say from watching these threads since i bought my PC when it came out; seems most of us who own one really like it and are happy with our purchase.
And some of those who don't own a PC have their reasons for not buying one. Which is their right of course.
So if one shopping around shares the concerns of the "non-PC" crowd then a std Shield can be a great gun to go with.
And for those who are interested in a PC, judging by what us owners think go ahead and give one a try.
And some of those who don't own a PC have their reasons for not buying one. Which is their right of course.
So if one shopping around shares the concerns of the "non-PC" crowd then a std Shield can be a great gun to go with.
And for those who are interested in a PC, judging by what us owners think go ahead and give one a try.
greeenteeee
Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2017
- Messages
- 242
- Reaction score
- 48
I have both a ported Shield and a Shield with an Apex Sear. Trigger pull weight is similar, triggers are nice in each, and feel similar enough.
I like the FO sights over the contrast sights-- easier to see the target.
I didn't care for the porting because of what I'd read but in outdoor or dimly lit indoor, the naked eye does not see the extra flash from the ports. Filming in 30fps, you'll see it in 1 frame.
I've read the ports ARE louder, but when I share the lanes with others shooting .40 or .45, a ported 9mm is not a concern.
I wear in ear and ear muffs for hearing protection, but you make me curious about any decibel differences between the ported and non ported Shield barrels... I'll find out next range trip.
I like the FO sights over the contrast sights-- easier to see the target.
I didn't care for the porting because of what I'd read but in outdoor or dimly lit indoor, the naked eye does not see the extra flash from the ports. Filming in 30fps, you'll see it in 1 frame.
I've read the ports ARE louder, but when I share the lanes with others shooting .40 or .45, a ported 9mm is not a concern.
I wear in ear and ear muffs for hearing protection, but you make me curious about any decibel differences between the ported and non ported Shield barrels... I'll find out next range trip.
