Bruce, our tours were similar. I was 12-16-69 to 10-16-70. I was at Long Binh the entire time.
"Too many brigade and battalion commanders were simply trying to punch their tickets instead of actually lead."
Originally posted by 10-12:
Bush Senior stopped short of Baghdad and the Liberals criticized him because of it. President Bush W went all the way and the Liberals criticized him because of it. President Bush W gave his generals far more latitude than Johnson gave his. Between Johnson and McNamara, a lot of good soldiers, marines and aviators were killed needlessly.
Bill
Originally posted by Amici:
Originally posted by feralmerril:
I had heard that president Johnson and his cronies would hand pick the targets for the next days bombing.
President Bush stopped General Schwartzkopf from finishing off the jammed up road of the iraq army trying to make it back from Kuwait.
My point really is that once the politicans all agree a war should be declared that they should step aside and let the military that is schooled in fighting take over and fight it.
I have always DESPISED LBJ, McNamara, Rusk, et al for how they micromanged the Vietnam War. A generation of Americans paid the price for their wimpiness.
Bush I kept the coalition together by NOT seeking to remove Hussein, as the neighbors feared what might come after him even more, which speaks volumes. Present events suggest the neighbors' concerns were valid.
As I recall, the coalition helped pay for the war and therefore had a voice in how it was prosecuted.
Originally posted by dlstewart01:
Originally posted by BLACKHAWKNJ:
The 12 month tour started in Korea, in that case the higher ups decided that one winter in Korea was enough. One reason why Vietnam was the bloody fiasco it became was careerism. One Army general said:
"Too many brigade and battlaion commanders were simply trying to punch their tickets instead of actually lead."
The Pentagon set the tour of duty for the critical position of Battalion Commander in the Army at 6 months, there was an unwritten policy that an officer would spend 6 months in the field, 6 months in the rear while an EM spent the whole 12 months in the field.
Also there was a great deal of micromanaging-I read that approval for special operations had to go through TEN levels for approval.
One of the best books on Vietnam is "The War Managers-American Generals reflect on Vietnam."
by Douglas Kinnard, BG, USA, Retired. he notes even the generals weren't sure what their mission was.
The 3/5 Cav was a combat unit. There was no rear for us. We spent 90% of the time at firebases or the boonies. Thats officers and every body, even the cooks. They cooked from a duce and a half. We got one hot meal a day. We oppereted from the Ashau valley to the DMZ.
Originally posted by jaysouth:
Originally posted by dlstewart01:
Originally posted by BLACKHAWKNJ:
The 12 month tour started in Korea, in that case the higher ups decided that one winter in Korea was enough. One reason why Vietnam was the bloody fiasco it became was careerism. One Army general said:
"Too many brigade and battlaion commanders were simply trying to punch their tickets instead of actually lead."
The Pentagon set the tour of duty for the critical position of Battalion Commander in the Army at 6 months, there was an unwritten policy that an officer would spend 6 months in the field, 6 months in the rear while an EM spent the whole 12 months in the field.
Also there was a great deal of micromanaging-I read that approval for special operations had to go through TEN levels for approval.
One of the best books on Vietnam is "The War Managers-American Generals reflect on Vietnam."
by Douglas Kinnard, BG, USA, Retired. he notes even the generals weren't sure what their mission was.
The 3/5 Cav was a combat unit. There was no rear for us. We spent 90% of the time at firebases or the boonies. Thats officers and every body, even the cooks. They cooked from a duce and a half. We got one hot meal a day. We oppereted from the Ashau valley to the DMZ.
Were you in the 1st Cav Division?