This (below) wasn't an "assumption"?
From an IPSC forum, the video didn't start at the beginning of the COF...
"the poor patcher has quite severe hearing problems, and before the video started recording (The COF had already started before the video started, as the shooter had his gun out and on the table for a tabletop start.) the RO had loudly asked "Range Clear?" and received no response from the patcher (because he couldn't hear the RO), so the RO believed the range to be clear and started the next shooter."
I would say it was more of a deduction or conclusion (based on the info given) then an assumption.
Not sure what your issue is. I'm not trying to start a pissing match with you but you obviously have an attitude for some reason.
I posted a video I came across to remind people this can be a dangerous sport if safety protocols aren't adhered to. I then did a little further research to try to find some more info about said video.
You state this was "an outlaw match" and he's not a registered RSO. So what were the safety procedures they had in place? Obviously the RO was at fault but, that really wasn't the point of any of my posts. Ultimately it's the shooter that would have to live with the end result. If you have some more concise information to add about the incident I'm sure we would all be interested to hear about it.
Feel free to leave me out of it though. I don't come here to argue with people.