Re: CA DOJ dropping 28 guns from its roster

Capt.Jim

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
303
Reaction score
403
Location
California :(
Re: CA DOJ dropping 28 guns from its roster

In one of two new declarations filed with the trial court, Smith & Wesson CEO James Debney stated that “as a result of the microstamping requirement, Smith & Wesson is losing its ability to sell many of its semi-automatic handguns in California, as its handguns are forced off the roster [by the California Department of Justice].”

The lawsuit, filed by Second Amendment Foundation and The Calguns Foundation, seeks to overturn the entire roster scheme and restore the full handgun market to California consumers. The case is helmed by noted civil rights attorneys Alan Gura of Alexandria, Virginia, Donald Kilmer of San Jose, California, and Jason Davis of Mission Viejo, California.

In January, The Calguns Foundation published its report on the roster’s effects on the California handgun market, which illustrates that the roster is an effective ban on handguns in common use for self-defense. The report, based on the California Department of Justice’s own roster database, shows that an average of 59 semi-automatic handguns have been removed from the roster every year for the past decade. However, 58 handgun models have already been removed by DOJ since January 1 of this year, with many more removals expected in coming months.

No new semi-automatic handguns may be placed on the Roster due to the DOJ’s enforcement of the “microstamping” requirement, which Calguns believes will lead to an increase in the rate of handgun removal. More, DOJ is apparently also requiring manufacturers to sign affidavits saying that no changes, even non-substantive changes in upstream components and suppliers, have been made since the handguns were submitted for testing
 
Register to hide this ad
Son of a guns(!) put a clause in this stupid CA law that even if a manufacturer of an existing model handgun on CA Approved roster changes as much as the spring tension or the material used for the spring it will be considered as a NEW model gun...

Even though all other components and design could be 100% same with the currently approved model, still. this NEW model gun required to have "microstamping" in order to continue to be on the CA roster...

What a BS!

Good luck on our lawsuit!
 
Back
Top