bushmaster1313
Member
Update February 8
on February 7 the Koons Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint that, in essence, limited the challenges to what Judge Bumb had already found was likely unconstitutional. IMHO this was very wise
Amended Complaint by Koons plaintiffs here
On February 7 Judge Bumb ordered a briefing schedule for the Preliminary Injunction Hearing:
On January 31 Judge Bumb confirmed that she did not restrain the recent New Jersey law as it applied to playgrounds
On January 30, Judge Bumb issued another TRO Order that basically confirmed her prior TRO Order. Some of the challenges were rejected for lack of standing.
Opinion Here
on February 7 the Koons Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint that, in essence, limited the challenges to what Judge Bumb had already found was likely unconstitutional. IMHO this was very wise
Amended Complaint by Koons plaintiffs here
On February 7 Judge Bumb ordered a briefing schedule for the Preliminary Injunction Hearing:
TEXT ORDER In light of Defendants' February 2, 2023, letter on the briefing scheduling for the Preliminary Injunction (PI) hearing [Dkt. No. 61], the Parties must submit a joint letter to the Court by February 10, 2023, providing: (1) the number of witnesses each Party will present at the PI hearing; and (2) the number of days the Parties anticipate the PI hearing will take. Once the Court receives this information, it will schedule a hearing accordingly. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 22-7464. (Costigan, Roberta) (Entered: 02/07/2023)
On January 31 Judge Bumb confirmed that she did not restrain the recent New Jersey law as it applied to playgrounds
On January 30, Judge Bumb issued another TRO Order that basically confirmed her prior TRO Order. Some of the challenges were rejected for lack of standing.
Opinion Here