Texas Star
US Veteran
Not to take from the Hemingway thread, I always preferred Ruark. Thought he improved and enhanced Hemingway's style, although some critics said he just copied H.
Any enthusuasts? Favorites?
I like best his, "Horn of the Hunter", about his first safari, "Something of Value", "Uhuru", and, "The Honey Badger."
But I read his Old Man stuff and I think a column in, "Field & Stream", and I have his safari article in, "Playboy" from (I think) April, 1965. It appeared soon before his death, and in two years, we had lost two of my favorite authors, him and Ian Fleming. (I began reading novels early in life.)
I think his African material was the best yet seen, and the most authentic, sometmes tackling tough political issues to tell the truth about Mau-Mau. I was disappointed with the movie version of, "Something of Value", where PC took over to some degree and it featured black actors who were themselves activists, probably not too keen to tell the facts about "freedom" movements in Africa.But that wasn't Ruark's fault. He did his part. Blame the lessened goodness of the film on Hollywood. The movie was still worth seeing.
And he instilled in me at an early age the desire to hunt in Africa, something that I've never achieved. But he made the landscape and the game and the conditions come alive in print as few have.
Any enthusuasts? Favorites?
I like best his, "Horn of the Hunter", about his first safari, "Something of Value", "Uhuru", and, "The Honey Badger."
But I read his Old Man stuff and I think a column in, "Field & Stream", and I have his safari article in, "Playboy" from (I think) April, 1965. It appeared soon before his death, and in two years, we had lost two of my favorite authors, him and Ian Fleming. (I began reading novels early in life.)
I think his African material was the best yet seen, and the most authentic, sometmes tackling tough political issues to tell the truth about Mau-Mau. I was disappointed with the movie version of, "Something of Value", where PC took over to some degree and it featured black actors who were themselves activists, probably not too keen to tell the facts about "freedom" movements in Africa.But that wasn't Ruark's fault. He did his part. Blame the lessened goodness of the film on Hollywood. The movie was still worth seeing.
And he instilled in me at an early age the desire to hunt in Africa, something that I've never achieved. But he made the landscape and the game and the conditions come alive in print as few have.
Last edited: