S&W 1911's

I wanted a 9mm version of my Colt Gold Cup National Match and I preferred it in stainless for low maintenance. The S&W Pro Series came close. It doesn't have the top rib or the wide trigger but otherwise I couldn't be happier. I thought that I would have to have a custom 1911 built. I'd be looking at 2 to 3 times the cost of this. So when these came out I jumped right on it. The only thing that I did to it was change the magazine catch lock from the factory slotted to a hex head (I felt it deserved it). I love the hand filling grips too. Actually I love everything about it
 

Attachments

  • 8CED74FE-48C5-432B-8C11-69F8CA0338EF.jpg
    8CED74FE-48C5-432B-8C11-69F8CA0338EF.jpg
    106.7 KB · Views: 70
  • A03D4534-3C07-42C0-B384-19E53FC30EF8.jpg
    A03D4534-3C07-42C0-B384-19E53FC30EF8.jpg
    102 KB · Views: 61
That makes me think - why an internal extractor on the 1911, when other designs (1903, vest pocket, 1910, et al) were external? I'd be curious to know why the design choice, if anyone knows.

Had something to do with meeting specification on a military contract, I guess. Or the intent of the spec. I dont know the 1911 pistol spec, but I'd guess maybe the internal extractor addressed a part of the requirements that had to do with entry of dirt into the pistol. Or something else specifically written in the design requirements

Browning had a purpose in everything he did. He didn't just decide to incorporate an internal extractor because it was Thursday. He designed the 1911 to meet a specific set of requirements. Just like he did with his 1935 design (which was modified and refined by Saive into the HP we know today). Browning didn't design for the sake of design. If the spec said it, he found a way to do it.
 
Last edited:
I bought one a long time ago. It's a 'JRD' and I just found out a few minutes ago it's a first year run. It's still bone stock and uses original springs and mags. Never had a problem with it or a reason to let it go. Great guns IMO.

I've had a handful of 1911's. My 'JRD' is my favorite to date. I did change out the springs because I bought it used. I might buy another one as a backup if I can find one at my price point.

The Colt '70 I had was one of the first ever put together by Bill Wilson before he even started Wilson Combat. It had S&W revolver sights on the topside. I ended up selling it to a Wilson collector.
 
I might have to look at one of these. Smith & Wesson SW1911TA.
 
I for one actually prefer the external extractor. I shoot mostly off a bench with a catch net beside the gun to capture my brass. The 1911s I used to own that had internal extractors needed an occasional tweak of the extractor to control where they threw their empties but the external ones haven't needed anything adjusted and continually toss their empties right into the net.

Ed
 
I bought one a long time ago. It's a 'JRD' and I just found out a few minutes ago it's a first year run. It's still bone stock and uses original springs and mags. Never had a problem with it or a reason to let it go. Great guns IMO.

I have a JRH that I bought new for my son when he was born in 2006. Its the model 108284 with SS finish, adjustable rear sight, and ambidextrous controls (in case he turned out to be a leftie!) I was surprised it came with 2 blued ACT magazines since images I had seen showed Wilson magazines. I asked S&W about that and was told they switched to ACT due to "issues" with the Wilson ones. From what I have read Wilson makes great mags so I'm thinking the only "issue" would be cost. They probably just got a better contract with ACT.

The ACT mags do have the S&W logo stamped on the left side and I was wondering if your Wilson mags do also? Are they SS or Blued?

Sorry to say I wont be able to give a range report for another 7 years! I want to give it to him at 21 and he'll be the first to fire it outside of the factory
 
Last edited:
That is a really great way to add sentimental value to a great 1911! I'm sure he will keep that one for life. To answer your question mine came with 2 stainless 8 rd Wilson Combat magazines. They have no S&W markings on them but do have Wilson Combat markings on the plastic extension under the floor plate.
 
I have a JRH that I bought new for my son when he was born in 2006. Its the model 108284 with SS finish, adjustable rear sight, and ambidextrous controls (in case he turned out to be a leftie!) I was surprised it came with 2 blued ACT magazines since images I had seen showed Wilson magazines. I asked S&W about that and was told they switched to ACT due to "issues" with the Wilson ones. From what I have read Wilson makes great mags so I'm thinking the only "issue" would be cost. They probably just got a better contract with ACT.

My SW1911 came with 2x Wilson 47D mags when I bought it. I now own two SW1911, one full size stainless and one SC. Wilson, Wilson, Wilson, mags are what runs best in both of them. 47D and their new 1911 mag, as well as their 10-rounders.
 
dan Wesson all the way for the money

My thoughts on my Smith & Wesson 1911 was never the same after the plunger tube became loose and fell off, much to my dismay. Sold it and finally moved to Dan Wesson.

As much as I hate to say it, Dan Wesson makes a wonderful 1911 and their quality surpasses almost every other 1911 I have examined.

uhbmXshh.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I don't think S&W gets enough credit for their 1911s. They may be a little pricy but not over priced imho. I really like how the 1911PC's barrel bushing adds to the tight tolerance and better shot groups.

Here is my 1911PD and 1911PC.
2t1XHZx.jpg


pByJvgN.jpg
 
I have a new SW1911 E-series Stainless 5" bought April 2020 at Sportsman's Warehouse for $845.00. I've only shot 50 rounds thru it and never been out of the house during days with any precipitation. My issue is that patches of surface rust have shown on the slide and now the sides of the hammer. The gun is oiled and kept in it's original case in my room. I didn't purchase my first 1911, a beautiful one at that carrying the Smith and Wesson name for it to develop surface rust after two months. I found one other instance of someone experiencing this problem with a SW1911 and he was advised to return it to S&W where it was resurfaced. Seems like a lot to deal with after such a large purchase, kinda disappointing. Any advice, experience, or criticism is welcome. Wishing I would have gone with the M&P Shield 2.0 .45 full size instead now. Called the 800# today and no one answered at S&W. Looking forward to any comments. Oh, this is not my first firearm. I own hunting rifles, shotguns, and handguns but this is my first Stainless piece.
 
Forty years ago I got back into competitive handguns in IPSC. It was all Colt 1911s. That led me back into active gunsmithing modifying my 1911s. I became somewhat hidebound about any other manufacturers' clones of Colt's 1911. My gunsmithing efforts for years was centered on customization of the Colt 1911. About 5 years ago I purchased a small collection of handguns that included a NIB S&W SS 1911 clone. I was very interested in the change to the external extractor as I had formulated the opinion that the internal extractor was the weakest point of J.M.B's design. I was impressed with what I found inside and outside the S&W 1911. A good friend that I turned into a S&W revolver collector had never owned any 1911. I had put about 500 rounds down range thru the Smith. My friend talked me into selling him the S&W SS 1911. He has two sons in the military. Every time one of them is home they head for the shooting range. To date they have put over 10,000 rounds of factory ammo thru this particular S&W 1911. They are impressed, I'm impressed and to date I've not had to tweak, correct or even look at this handgun on my workbench. On this one example I think that S&W has improved J.M.B's design and are certainly capable of producing as good of 1911 as Colt ever did.
 
Back
Top