OP... If I were you I wouldn't "ignore any other advice", and I'd probably ignore the above referenced post. I hate to be mean, but one of the benefits of the internet and forums is the ability to ask questions and discuss. One of the drawbacks is that anyone, including those who lack knowledge and may be plain wrong and dangerous can respond and it's sometimes hard to tell who is what.
Over-torquing is unlikely (but possibly) the problem. There are many more likely causes. As for actual torque specs, general torque specs vary for material (allow steel vs. the various carbon and stainless steels) and the general published torque specs are often less than those recommended by optic, component, or firearm manufacturers, so I would warn against exceeding those recommendations unless you really know what you are doing. 18 inch pounds exceeds both the recommendations of S&W as well as most optics (with the notable exceptions of the Leupold DeltaPoint Pro (25in/lbs), Aimpoint ACRO (26 in/lbs) and Holosun 509T (20 in/lbs). Recommending to tighten to 24 in/lbs without knowing what optic and mount is absolutely irresponsible.
As for some back story, you can reference this thread which includes my department's method for mounting optics, which has been adopted by dozens of law enforcement agencies and other organizations. It also shows some background of why I not only disagree with jschmdt but think he's dangerous in giving blanket advice without real knowledge.
http://smith-wessonforum.com/smith-...p-2-0-core-shearing-screws.html#post141568839
As for this thread, I'd be curious exactly how the optic was mounted, what threadlocker was used if any, and whether a torque wrench was used and what torque setting. Then we can start to see where problems may have developed. We've only installed seven or eight optics on M&P 10mm guns, and one person who installed their own had it shear. The ones we've done have not had issues but none have a ton of rounds through them.