S&W 500 8 3/8" vs. Taurus Raging hunter 6.75"

Ga.BuckBuster

Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2003
Messages
41
Reaction score
10
Location
Tucker,Georgia, USA
Hi guys,
It's been long awhile since I posted on here. Don't hunt anymore, but I still like to shoot my big bore handguns. I have a S&W 500 8 3/8" barrel and was always wanting a model with just a slightly shorter barrel, like the 7.5" that S&W used to make, (you know, the one that looks like a SS 29 on steroids, not the performance model, too much$$)
I handled a Taurus 6.75" 500 Raging Hunter at a gun show in ATL area last weekend. Grip seemed a little big and chunky compared to my S&W 500.
Just wanted to see if anyone owns these two guns and how do they compare according to their pros and cons if you've owned and shot them both.

Thanks!
 
Register to hide this ad
I bought this gun because I fired my friends with the 8 3/8” barrel and didn’t like the balance. This one feels just right. It is a 6.5”

 
Last edited:
I have no experience with the Taurus but have a Smith 500 in both 8 3/8" and 4" lengths. While the long one is heavier there is no real difference when you shoot them. Both kick about the same.
 
I've shot both side by side.

S&W wins for fit/finish and overall quality control in my opinion. The S&W grip fit my hand better but the Taurus grip was a little bit squishier. Recoil from both is hefty to say the least and neither are what I'd call a pleasant plinker gun. Offhand balance on the Taurus is better not under recoil. Under recoil, they both feel about like a small bomb is going off in your hand, lol.

Personally, I'd keep the S&W until you replace it with another S&W with a preferred barrel length
 
Thanks for the info. from someone who has shot both guns. The S&W 500 is a nicer looking gun. They should bring back the 6.5" model in in the basic config. The Performance model in 7.5" is a little too rich for my blood.
 
Back
Top