S&W or Kimber ?

...I think it has to do with the Schwartz firing pin system. It feels weird. I don't know how to explain.

Maybe not the firing pin safety. I had this same impression of my TLE II. I could tell it was a good shooting pistol but I did not like the feel of the gun in my hand. I was pretty sure I knew why. The first thing I did was replace the grip safety, which solved the problem, for me.
 
The external extractor on the S&W's will always be a deal breaker for me. If not a Colt, get the Kimber...several large PD's can't be wrong when they chose the Kimber as their primary duty guns.

Why is the external extractor a deal breaker for you? Tradition, cosmetics, function? I have Smiths and love 'em so am just honestly curious why you would exclude them based on the extractor. I'm not trying to be funny as there are others who share your opinion.

I find very little bad press on the Smith but not too hard to find complaints on the Kimber...I haven't owned a Kimber, just sayin'.
 
Last edited:
I owned three Kimbers, Stainless Custom II, Pro Carry, and TLE. All three were great when they worked. All three plagued with FTF, stove pipes, and FTE. I drank the kook aide about break in period etc. the customer service was not the best. I ended up every time trading or selling all three. The two best 1911's I have owned are the Springfield Armory and S&W. Of course, if you want a 45 that will eat anything, dead accurate, and last forever, try to find a 4506-1.
 
I bought 2 new guns this week. I guess if a picture is worth a thousand words......

911EampXDSLevel_zpse947cfd6.jpg
 
Dann, I have a couple friends who like to excoriate me for being harsh about steel-frame "Commanders." I just think it a travesty that some people confuse those heavy, clunky things with a real Commander. :) Colt should have picked another name - maybe Commodore? Like the naval officer of that rank, they should be few and far between, as far as I am concerned. :D

Just kidding. If you like them that is great. I'll admit in my group of friends I am in the minority that thinks them "unattractive." One of them went to the trouble to build up a compensated Combat Commander that could be worn in a standard 1911 holster. I'll admit it was a nice shooting gun, but I was not sure what it accomplished that an ordinary full-size 1911 wouldn't do as well.
 
I've worked on/fired a few Kimbers over the years, and I can tell you that, for the premium they command, I'm not impressed. Although I don't have any experience with the Smiths, I've handled a few and they just seem to have a nicer build quality to them. I mean, come on Kimber, a plastic mainspring housing? Really?
 
As was indicated on the picture it is a S&W Mod. 1911 E. That is the model number. It is the "base" model with other variations available (shorter barrels, adjustable sights, round butts, etc.)

They are currently in the distribution pipeline so if you're looking for one now is the time to buy if you can find one during the new buying frenzy....:)
 
I own both and would go with the smith just in case you have a problem. All three of my smiths have been 100%. My Kimber has been 100% also, but the barrel on my Kimber started rusting right after I got it. Called Kimber and was told that it was normal, I have come to live with it but it will be the last one for me. Best of luck and be sure to post what you get.
Wow i would never think that a weapon manufacture would ever say that!
 
Wow i would never think that a weapon manufacture would ever say that!

The hood of the barrel on my TLEII started rusting too, so it must be normal. :)

Just kidding, of course. Never have had a gun develop any rust in all my years of shooting, until then. Whatever steel they use for their barrels must be prone to that. Not very impressive...
 
Dann, I have a couple friends who like to excoriate me for being harsh about steel-frame "Commanders." I just think it a travesty that some people confuse those heavy, clunky things with a real Commander. :) Colt should have picked another name - maybe Commodore? Like the naval officer of that rank, they should be few and far between, as far as I am concerned. :D

Just kidding [...] QUOTE]

M29since14, maybe Colt should've called it a "Rear Admiral lower half" instead?:D Talk about "few and-far between"!

Something about the name of that rank has always tickled the you-know-what out of me. Must be latent 8th-grader still inside this 56-year-old brain. He does enjoy making an appearance now and then.:eek:

Just kidding, too; no disrespect intended to the Commander.
 
Back
Top