Sherlock Holmes and the Mystery of the S&W

Joined
Jul 3, 2017
Messages
413
Reaction score
2,005
Location
Iowa
In an effort to draw Holmes out of his funk, I dropped the revolver with a thud on his desk. “Here is my latest gun. What do you make of it?”
Holmes turned, his curiosity piqued. He picked up the gun, turning it over and over. He took his handkerchief and swabbed the barrel and a cylinder. He produced a small tool and used it to remove the grips. He viewed the gun again from all angles and then dry fired it. He smiled and put the gun next to his violin. “This gun, which you just purchased on Gunbroker, is a Smith & Wesson Military and Police model, circa 1926. It was purchased and owned by a fairly successful lawyer who used it for protection. He didn’t shoot much. He lost money in the crash of ‘29, but didn’t do himself in. The gun sat in his right desk drawer for over 40 years until his son acquired it. When the son died, his family sold the gun. You acquired it for a very reasonable sum.”
I started to gag on my tea. “What? Are you kidding? You’re making this all up. You’re guessing!! “
“Actually, my dear Thinnes, it’s elementary. It’s a simple matter of observation and deduction”.
“ I must confess”, I said, “that you are absolutely right on all accounts. The son’s wife gave me the full history of the gun and family. But tell me. I must know! How in the dickens do you know all this??
“Elementary, good chap. First of all, I saw the FedEx package you brought the gun in, and I know your buying habits. So Gunbroker was easy. You wouldn’t be showing me the gun if you thought you paid too much, so I deduced you got it for a rather small sum”.
“Fair enough,” I said. “What about the gun?”
“Yes, a bit more difficult. The barrel says 38 S&W special cartridge. It has a half moon front sight and a notch rear sight. It’s a Millitary & Police model. It carries no model number in the yoke and it has 5 screws, so it predates 1957. The serial number is 523592, which puts shipping date around 1926, prior to the big crash. It has the old one line address”.
“Yes, go on. The owner?”
“The gun is in 99% condition on the right side. The left side of the gun is a bit more worn, 90-95%. I suspect this gun sat for a very long time in a desk drawer on its left side, resulting in some wear on that side only. There are no holster markings. The owner wanted it available for protection. If sitting on its left side in the drawer, it was ready for a right handed grab. The gun was in the right desk drawer. The owner didn’t want to have to reach across his body and grope in the left drawer for access.”
“Go on”, I said, stunned.
“The man had the finances to buy a very good gun in 1926. He needed protection. Not a doctor or office worker, the owner was successful and wanted a gun for protection. Not an accountant, likely a lawyer. Someone who deals with upset people. Possibly a stockbroker. He never replaced the gun in the 1930’s when he could have purchased a Registered Magnum or a Heavy Duty. No, I think he had a change in finances. I believe he lost money in the crash and didn’t replace the gun. He may have thought about suicide but didn’t do it . There are no blood protein stains on the gun. Also remember, the gun was in the drawer for a very long time. I can tell that the gun was not shot very much. There is no turn line and only slight silvering at the muzzle. The grips are original to the gun. Convex, in very good shape. Diamond walnut. Very well cared for. This gun was not handled or shot much. The hammer and trigger retain vivid case coloring. The next owner also cared for the gun, almost cherishing it. A family member. I suspect a son had it next. Not a daughter. Why did the gun leave the family eventually? I suspect the son died and his family didn’t have the same connection to the gun as the son.
“Amazing”, I said, “just amazing”.
“Elementary observation and deductive reasoning, my good man. Now, let us try our luck with your new weapon at the range”.
The end?
 

Attachments

  • Holmes 1.jpg
    Holmes 1.jpg
    224.5 KB · Views: 242
  • Holmes 2.jpg
    Holmes 2.jpg
    227.1 KB · Views: 208
  • Holmes 3.jpg
    Holmes 3.jpg
    226.9 KB · Views: 196
  • Holmes 4.jpg
    Holmes 4.jpg
    226.5 KB · Views: 215
  • Holmes 5.jpg
    Holmes 5.jpg
    215.6 KB · Views: 176
Register to hide this ad
See, this is why I’ve always thought that the tired old platitude to “buy the gun, not the story” is much too simplistic. All historical collectors buy stories with their guns; one must just take care that they’re documented.

As this lovely piece of writing shows, a story greatly enhances the gun. Of course, ideally you pay only for the gun and get the story for free, as seems to be the case here ;)
 
A dashed good story, but would Holmes be alive then to tell it?

He and Watson were active by the 1880's and he'd be pretty old when that gun was made. His use of cocaine might have killed him off, too.

Moreover, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle didn't know guns very well at all, so neither did his character, Holmes. This wasn't limited to the Holmes stories, but his, "The Lost World" volume was also very poor in describing and choosing guns. The 1999-2002 TV series based on that book did a far better job, gun-wise and generally.

I could never care for the Holmes tales, because they were so unreal. A Russell's viper drinking milk and crawling through vents to get it? Ape genes in an athletic man? Tsk, tsk... and Doyle was a physician as well as an author. He should have known better. And I've never been able to enjoy detective stories where the gun data is so poor.

As an aside, you might want to properly paragraph your story. Make it more clear where the speaker changes. Having published both regular articles and fiction, I am well aware of the difficulty of writing good fiction, where you need to pay attention to quote marks and paragraphing.

But I enjoyed your tale and it was both funny and informative. You might have added how the owner, if in the UK, complied with the Firearms Act of 1920 in buying the gun. The red tape alone might have discouraged his buying more guns. And if he was as described, he'd have had little interest in buying a .38-44 or .357 Magnum. He wasn't a shooter; just a man wanting basic protection at his desk.

This would also be the case if Holmes was visiting in the USA when delivering this analysis.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the input. As I recall, Holmes didn’t have a gun. He did ask Watson to bring along his sidearm on an occasion or two. Watson was a physician and served in the British military forces.
 
SOME Holmes stories......

...were singularly awful. But I still enjoyed reading 'The Speckled Band' because it was so unexpected. And some of the stories are excellent.

'The Red Haired League' was a pretty good comedy. Again, really twisted on the ending.:)

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0ozIHomn8Q[/ame]
 
Thanks for the input. As I recall, Holmes didn’t have a gun. He did ask Watson to bring along his sidearm on an occasion or two. Watson was a physician and served in the British military forces.


I think he had one and fired it at a target in his "rooms". Must have generated a lot of black powder smoke. But not much penetration!

I did rather like, "The Hound of the Baskervilles" and have speculated on which gun I'd carry if invited to help catch or kill the large dog. The concept intrigues me.
 
Very well done, Thinnes!! As a life long follower of the Holmes Saga, I think you caught the spirit of the tales exactly. Holmes did have revolvers though, and he also would occasionally ask Watson to bring his along. A much happier time in England before the draconian laws which now plague the country.

Oh, by the way, very nice revolver!!!!

Best Regards, Les
 
I really don’t think it’s been refinished. No refinish marks. Grips are numbered to the gun and they are in great shape. They actually click into place. Case coloring is all there. Gun has little nicks and imperfections visible in the sunlight. All the wear is on the left side of the barrel, which prompted me to conclude the gun sat on its left side and slid around in a drawer for a very long time. Bore, cylinders and forcing cone look really clean and fresh. I wrote the story because I was wondering about the odd wear pattern.
 
Ummm, the gun has just one cylinder. The holes in it are called chambers...I'm surprised that this error happens so often here, on a gun board. :rolleyes:

As for Watson's "service revolver", I've speculated about it on another board. Can I mention it here? I always dread another ding. Garry James also wrote an article about Holmes's presumed guns in, "Guns and Ammo" some years ago.

I think Watson probably owned an Adams .450, likely a MK II.
I think Holmes should have had a Webley RIC .455, Model of 1883, with rounded butt and about a three-inch barrel.

As for the hound, I'd take a pair of Colt SAA revolvers, one with 4.75 inch bbl. and one with 7.5 inch bbl., for more open wear on the moor. I'd like the added power of the longer barrel, and those things point like they're laser directed. I once used one and a Ruger Super Blackhawk to shoot at a human silhouette at 15 yards. It was almost hard to miss getting shots in the kill zone.

I'd also want a Winchester, probably a M-1886 in .45/70 or if available yet, a sporting .303 and soft-nosed bullets. Don't know just when that tale was set, but by 1898, Col. Patterson certainly had a .303 sporter as he sought the man-eating lions of Tsavo.

It's fun to discuss Holmes guns, but I prefer to discuss those for the Challenger Expedition in, "The Lost World." The TV show did a pretty good job. And I liked the better portrayals of Lord Roxton and Prof. Challenger and the addition of the hot girls. In the book, the only chick was Challenger's younger wife, whom he treated badly. She didn't go on the expedition.

If anyone wants to discuss Lost World guns, start a thread. I'm glad the TV show had the expedition leaving in 1919, allowing wider gun choice than did the book, published in 1912. The Colt .45 autos used by two men were more plausible by then. And Roxton's .416 Rigby rifle was available. It and the Colt pistol were barely announced in 1911. And Roxton also had a pair of ivory-butted Webley MK VI revolvers, nickel plated. Those dated from 1915, at the earliest, although the very similar Wilkinson-Webleys of 1905 and 1911 could be subbed. Webley also had an Army model from 1904 that was very like a MK VI. The main difference was that it had a front sight like a MK IV military gun.

This Army .455 was a commercial gun, intended to appeal to officers buying their own revolvers.
 
Last edited:
As to safety of Webleys with smokeless powder, in 1913, the MK V appeared. The only difference from MK IV was that the cylinder was a little thicker, to allow greater safety with smokeless loads.

But if that was a serious problem, it'd have been addressed sooner.

I'd have wanted .455 Colt ammo, the commercial form of .455 MK I. With a longer case and more powder, it'd give about 750 FPS instead of the app. 600 FPS of the MK II service load. This was also loaded in Canada, by CIL/Dominion.

However, the Man Stopper MK III and IV loads used the shorter MK II case. These were supposedly very effective at close battle ranges.
 
Remember that an “Eley’s Number 2 is a good argument for a gentleman who can bend fireplace pokers”.

In the movies, Holmes carried a wide variety of revolvers ranging from Colt SAAs to the Colt 1878 DA which would make perfect sense as Colt had offices in London.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top