5Wire
Member
Thanks for 'splainin' 

Good news, sir. I believe that S&W has returned to making normal length firing pins.Already have a 4" 66-7, excellent gun and a very sweet shooter.
I could care less about the IL but hate the CA compliant firing pin.....nothing an Apex pin and spring won't fix.
Isn't it a little odd that S&W has cataloged the 66 as an N-frame?
You are correct. I went back a re-read. The 2-piece barrel is mentioned on the S&W web site.
I now also notice, in addition to the Canada barrel length, it has a ball-detent lock-up.
I am thinking out loud here, but wonder if that and the 2-piece barrel allows a thicker barrel shank in the 6 o'clock position so that Magnum ammo is not as punishing? Otherwise, why go to the trouble of the ball-detent lock-up?
And for those of you looking, the L frame Model 69 and the K frame Model 66 are both in the N frame section under revolvers on S&W's web site.
Very happy it's back. Even though I own 3 k frame 357 s I will probably save up and buy the new 66. It's the only one I don't have and I can take out the lock. K frame point and shoot better than about every other gun I've ever shot. Going to get a cc license this year and I would rather have one of these than one of my old ones as evidence if I ever had to use one. Really wish it was a 3 inch though.
sometimes i wouldnt even recognize this forum if it wasnt for the blue background. pretty sad.
i for one, find this to be great news , i will be ordering the l frame and maybe the 66 as well .good timing because i just bought a 6" 66 to have cut down to 4 1/4.
maybe ill just sell it to fuel the purchase of a new 66.
HOORAY FOR SMITH & WESSON!!!
i have a 629 4 1/4" its my favorite piece ,a friend has a 686 in 4 1/4"
i dont give a rats bottom if some of you dont like it , dont buy it then.![]()
AE stated that everyone has a right to an opinion. Obviously you don't agree with that.
$850.00......for a $400.00 gun.......insane prices.....
$850.00......for a $400.00 gun.......insane prices.....
Why should the U.S. consumer be forced to buy a 4.25" barrel in order to accommodate foreign countries. Seems like the flavor of the day here in the U.S. This is strickly a cost cutting production move and if the U.S. buyer doesn't like it than too bad. Well I'm not giving my money to a company with this attitude.
Is the extra 1/4" really that big of a deal?
Frankly I'm happy that S&W is still making any revolvers that aren't plastic J frames.
And if it sells profitably in spite of some dislike that's an opposite message and motivates continued manufacture, eh?I'm sorry to be so negative in my posts about current production Smith & Wesson revolvers but the ONLY way to motivate any company to change its product is to let them know the current item is not well-liked.
Eloquence, sheer eloquence.Man, the haters are out in full force here!! Can't these people get over something that happened almost 15 yrs. ago? Why do they keep posting their venom in threads like these? If you don't like S&W's new models fine, but don't stop & piss in every thread like some drunken brother in law at Christmas! This BS was old TEN YEARS ago. Get over it & move on. This is why S&W is making money & Colt has had the wolf at the door since '86. Technology changes and people do as well or they get left behind.
You do know that S&W does not own this board, nor have any affiliation with it whatsoever, don't you?I'm sorry to be so negative in my posts about current production Smith & Wesson revolvers but the ONLY way to motivate any company to change its product is to let them know the current item is not well-liked.
You do know that S&W does not own this board, nor have any affiliation with it whatsoever, don't you? You do know that we don't make the guns here, don't you?
My first Smith&Wesson was a Model 19 4" in 1970, a Bangor Punta abortion. Tried to carry it as a duty weapon but 5 rounds of W-W 357s and the gun would bind as one side of the cylinder was .005 wider than the other. Forcing cone was undersized and the hot lead and powder particles and lock up was soon to occur.
Gun was screwed up like Hogan's goat. Took a professional gunsmith and a lot of machine work to get it tuned and operating reliably, also a years time. That year included a trip to the Mothership who advised that I was shooting too hot of ammo in it. That was their fix.
When I started looking for alternative Smiths to carry, it was basically a sellers market. You could buy 6" Model 10s all day from Smith but the idea of a Model 66 wasn't reality then.
I've been shooting Smiths predominately for 48 years, it's nice to see them bring back the 66 such a nice carrying weapon in a very adequate caliber. Thanks S&W for jumping back into K frames, magnum style.