Last year I made the decision to move from .45 ACP to 9mm for a few IPSC competitions. I obtained the last 1000 124 gn plated round nosed 9mm projectiles my supplier had in stock, and placed an indent order for 5000 mixed .45 and 9mm projectiles for delivery in the New Year.
Come late January with the shipment delayed and a competition last weekend I borrowed 1000 plated truncated cone (flat point) bullets from a another club member to be replaced when the shipment finally arrived (3 days before the comp).
During the first day the match my Kimber 9mm 1911 A1 was plagued with cartridge misfeeds. It was always the first and second round in the full magazine that caught on the feed ramp costing me time. The same profile in .45 ACP has always fed reliably. For the second day I dug out some practice (not barrel dropped) 124 gn PRN reloads I had in my cupboard and there was no further feeding problems.
First question: Has anyone else had this problem with flat point 9mm bullets?
Next, my rounds were loaded with a just under max load (5.5 gns) of some repackaged Winchester Action Pistol powder bought from a local ammunition manufacturer who use it in their factory loads. Everything I have read says this is an accurate powder across all loadings in 9mm, but I have to admit that I have not been overly impressed with the accuracy. Even the factory 9mm loads with this powder have never approached the groups I have achieved with my preferred loads in another 9mm pistol (103 gn bullet @ 1300 fps). Groups are not as tight as in other calibers (45 ACP/.38 Special) at the same ranges either.
I had the same problem with the same powder in 45 ACP using both 230 gn LRN and 200 gn PTC bullets and switched to Tightgroup powder for the 200 grn's which grouped much tighter out to 45 meters.
I am considering changing to Tightgroup for 9mm but the max load on Hodgdon's website is 4.1 gn for 1057 fps. I am looking for around 1180 fps to make a 134-136 power factor. I also seat my bullets out slightly to function better in some .38 Super mags I have without a spacer fitted in the rear, which drops velocity a bit (I found this out when first loading for my 1911 9mm as the first couple of charges I tried more than made PF in standard length rounds (around 128-129 PF) but failed to make it in those where the projectiles were seated out (122 PF).
Second question: Has anyone else found accuracy issues with WAP?
And finally: Any experiences with Tightgroup in 9mm?
Come late January with the shipment delayed and a competition last weekend I borrowed 1000 plated truncated cone (flat point) bullets from a another club member to be replaced when the shipment finally arrived (3 days before the comp).
During the first day the match my Kimber 9mm 1911 A1 was plagued with cartridge misfeeds. It was always the first and second round in the full magazine that caught on the feed ramp costing me time. The same profile in .45 ACP has always fed reliably. For the second day I dug out some practice (not barrel dropped) 124 gn PRN reloads I had in my cupboard and there was no further feeding problems.
First question: Has anyone else had this problem with flat point 9mm bullets?
Next, my rounds were loaded with a just under max load (5.5 gns) of some repackaged Winchester Action Pistol powder bought from a local ammunition manufacturer who use it in their factory loads. Everything I have read says this is an accurate powder across all loadings in 9mm, but I have to admit that I have not been overly impressed with the accuracy. Even the factory 9mm loads with this powder have never approached the groups I have achieved with my preferred loads in another 9mm pistol (103 gn bullet @ 1300 fps). Groups are not as tight as in other calibers (45 ACP/.38 Special) at the same ranges either.
I had the same problem with the same powder in 45 ACP using both 230 gn LRN and 200 gn PTC bullets and switched to Tightgroup powder for the 200 grn's which grouped much tighter out to 45 meters.
I am considering changing to Tightgroup for 9mm but the max load on Hodgdon's website is 4.1 gn for 1057 fps. I am looking for around 1180 fps to make a 134-136 power factor. I also seat my bullets out slightly to function better in some .38 Super mags I have without a spacer fitted in the rear, which drops velocity a bit (I found this out when first loading for my 1911 9mm as the first couple of charges I tried more than made PF in standard length rounds (around 128-129 PF) but failed to make it in those where the projectiles were seated out (122 PF).
Second question: Has anyone else found accuracy issues with WAP?
And finally: Any experiences with Tightgroup in 9mm?