How will you dress in those woods? Must you carry concealed? Which wild animals might you need to shoot? Is there a dog problem?
I have both guns and love both. If I could have only one, it'd be the M-66. But it is harder to conceal, and the Ruger probably is less likely to develop cylinder endshake or have a barrel throat crack with hot loads.
But if you keep lead buildup cleaned out of the barrel throat and avoid blowtorch ammo, the 66 is quite durable. Just limit .357 use to maybe 10-15%, if you want longtime durability.
I have found the SP-101 trigger to be quite heavy, but pretty smooth. The single-action cocking stroke is also long and hard. Compared to a S&W M-60-4, the Smith action has the edge, but the Ruger is tougher over the long haul, and offers .357 capability without a lock.
I think you should eventually get both, but if concealment is paramount and you don't have issues with the Ruger's heavy trigger pull, it might be the better choice.
Ruger's GP-100 is larger than the M-66, but mine has a really nice trigger pull, much easier than does the smaller SP. And it will hold up better than any S&W, I think. Cylinder endshake and cylinder timing issues plague Ruger less than any other revolver brand, in my experience.
But the M-66 is a fine gun that will do well by you and which has more prestige than Ruger in the eye of the average gun owner. It's a bit more classy in looks and refinement. Keep in mind that S&W may be out of replacement parts if anything breaks or wears badly. But many gunsmiths have parts and ability to do repairs.
Actually, if you don't shoot a whole lot and the gun is in nice shape when you buy it, repairs may never be needed.
I hope that helps!
