wadcutter1
Member
I did a little experiment at the range yesterday to compare the time it takes to reload with a speed loader vs using a backup gun. The range doesn't allow drawing from a holster so the guns and speed loaders were placed on the table in front of me. The exercise was:
1) Press start on my iPhone timer.
2) Pick up model 10 and fire 6 aimed shots.
3) Put down the 10 and pickup either speed loader (Safariland comp iii) or 638
4) Fire one 5-6 more aimed rounds.
5) Put down the gun and stop the timer.
Times with the speed loader averaged about 22 seconds. Times with the 638 averaged about 17 seconds. While I expected the speed loader would take longer, I was surprised how much faster the back up gun was. I wasn't trying to rush it, but if I was I imagine the difference would be even more dramatic.
I'm not sure if this has much of a practical impact on me, as I'd carry my Glock 23 rather than two revolvers, but I thought it was interesting from at least a historical perspective. I think I'll reread "Tales of the Stakeout Squad".
Anyone else try this, or have similar comparison drills to suggest?
1) Press start on my iPhone timer.
2) Pick up model 10 and fire 6 aimed shots.
3) Put down the 10 and pickup either speed loader (Safariland comp iii) or 638
4) Fire one 5-6 more aimed rounds.
5) Put down the gun and stop the timer.
Times with the speed loader averaged about 22 seconds. Times with the 638 averaged about 17 seconds. While I expected the speed loader would take longer, I was surprised how much faster the back up gun was. I wasn't trying to rush it, but if I was I imagine the difference would be even more dramatic.
I'm not sure if this has much of a practical impact on me, as I'd carry my Glock 23 rather than two revolvers, but I thought it was interesting from at least a historical perspective. I think I'll reread "Tales of the Stakeout Squad".
Anyone else try this, or have similar comparison drills to suggest?
Last edited: