Allen-frame,
Let me encourage you to pause the process for about a month until you have had a chance to get a letter on your gun to see just how it originally shipped. If you are going to go through the cost and trouble of restoring it, it makes sense to put a gun of that quality back as it was originally.
I can make the point by showing you an RM which I received that was a worn and badly done blue. The condition was such that I would have kept it as a shooter only. Roy's letter changed my mind when I learned that it was one of only a few (perhaps only 20-25) non-Registered Magnums which originally shipped as a nickel gun and it went to a State Trooper. I had Gene Williams restore it to the original form.
![]()
It is difficult to determine just how badly your gun was refinished. The third picture of the original nickel finish shows that the front of the rib and sight boss is rounded, but later pictures don't indicate that. Even if it has been over polished a little, a good restorer can correctly restore much of the sharpness. I can tell you that that hammer is NOT the original hammer and trigger for a Reg. Mag. When it comes to finding one, it will be difficult but not impossible. You will pay about as much for the hammer as the refinish may cost, but the value of the gun will be raised by the proper hammer.
There are limited reasons and circumstances where restoring makes sense. Returning a badly handled rare gun to better condition is one of them. Refinishing, just for the sake of refinishing isn't necessarily one.
Bob
Hello Bob
Very Sage advice here, I am in Awe with that Nickel Registered Magnum of yours, it is very Gorgeous and you should be Very, Very proud to own it. Do you shoot it ? Just Curious.... You mentioned that Gene Williams restored it for you by Putting the Nickel finish back on it. About what time frame was that work done ? I have heard in the past that Ford's in Florida did all His Nickel finish's was yours done at Ford's as well ? Best regards, Hammerdown